Tag Archives: Statist

Don’t Like Corporations? Well, Guess What? Governments Are Responsible for Legally Creating Them!

By | |
Leave a comment

The following debate originally took place upon my Facebook wall, after I posted artwork being shared by the page, “V is for Voluntary”…

Rayn:

“Democide: if you support government, you’ve probably never heard of this.”

“Democide: if you support government, you’ve probably never heard of this.”

Daniel F.: And when corporations essentially have all the power of governments, what’s the difference?

Rayn: So, you’re telling me that you STILL haven’t realized that governments are the ones responsible for “legally” CREATING these “power[ful]” corporations you speak of? LOL!

Either way, both of these legal fictions essentially function as protective Straw-men, by LIMITING THE PERSONAL LIABILITY of those humans who operate them, while maximizing their personal profitability! But, alas, you’re missing the point of this post…

Did you even take a moment to notice the comment that originally came with this picture before posting your response to it? It says, “Statists be like, ‘but corporations are evil’.” In other words, your Red herring fallacy of a response is such a predictably off-topic digression, it might as well have been pre-programmed into you by an outside influence. As it stands, I view it as your means of quickly eliminating the cognitive dissonance you experienced when you attempted to reconcile your active support of Statism with the fact that it is WELL-ESTABLISHED as the number one murderer of human beings around the globe for the last century.

"Governments murdered 262,000,000 disarmed civilians in the 20th century. Anti-Statism is a life saver." (Artwork originally located here, where it was posted by the Facebook page, "Bastiat Institute")

“Governments murdered 262,000,000 disarmed civilians in the 20th century. Anti-Statism is a life saver.”
(Artwork originally located here, upon the Facebook page, “Bastiat Institute“)

I would suggest you engage in some deeply Critical thinking about the topic of hundreds of millions being murdered by their own governments, aka “Democide” and you’ll soon find yourself completely out of excuses for supporting the State, and might even feel ashamed that you ever even remotely consented to such an abominable system of coercion, exploitation and violence against your fellow man.

Otherwise, simply ignore me as a “lunatic fringe,” and keep on voting harder for more of that “necessary” evil (the lesser of two, of course) to keep you feeling safe and secure in your person. If that’s the case, then I wish you well in your journey, and hope that you are able to find some semblance of comfort in being “ruled” by an “elect”-caste of sociopathic, morally-inferior “betters.”

In the words of Samuel Adams:

“Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”

Dispelling Statist Myths About the Nature of Anarchy

By | |
Leave a comment

The following debate orginally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “The ‘Social Contract’ Doesn’t Exist“…

Rayn: “But.. muh social ‘contract’ proves that they are!” – Shit Statists Say

Hmm… since when are non-consensual arrangements fabricated upon invisible paper with invisible ink referred to as “contracts”? Just more proof that Statism Is A Cult!

"Anarchism: the radical notion that other people are not your property"

“Anarchism: the radical notion that other people are not your property”

Katherine C.: Without getting into an exhausting conversation, I’m just curious that since anarchy by definition is the absolute freedom of the individual, regardless of political views, what would an anarchist do about murderers, paedophiles, and the like since they would be technically free to do whatever they’d like, according to anarchists?

Greg C.: Summary execution on the fuckin spot. Get caught doin something fucked up out comes the 45 and down they go…

Rayn: As I explained to you previously, Katherine, when you misunderstood the concept of Anarchy in our last debate: the word simply means “no rulers.” And, when this concept is properly and logically understood, using PROOF, instead of romantic fables and foundation-free myth, it is clear that the REASON we have no legitimate rulers is because of the self-evident fact that we are ALL born with our very own Individual sovereignty (AKA Self-ownership). With this logic understood correctly, we are NOT, in any way “technically free to do whatever [we] like,” because that would imply a host of actions which would completely violate the Individual Sovereignty of those around us. Realize that Anarchy is not at all chaos, but rather: peace, respect, liberty, and the only real equality there is! I absolutely own myself… and, so do you, my friend!

Indeed, these inaccurate ideas about Anarchy you have been suggesting here are very pervasive within our society, due to repeated efforts, over a long period of time, by the elitist, ruling class, and their minions, alike, to hijack this word, and run it into the ground, in hopes of quelling the evolution of humanity, in favor of CONTROL and BONDAGE. And, it is precisely this co-opting of the term that has caused real Anarchists to avoid it, in order to embrace the more-accurately-descriptive word, “Voluntaryism,” which, by definition, is founded upon the reality of Individual sovereignty and the Non-aggression principle that binds it. There is no wiggle-room for claiming Voluntaryism to be CHAOS, when CONSENT and COOPERATION are written into the very term, itself! 🙂

Meanwhile, “the absolute freedom of the individual,” you mention, as my last two paragraphs describe, is best-referred to as “Individual sovereignty,” and as I also mentioned, can only be acknowledged and exercised in regards to EVERY SINGLE OTHER INDIVIDUAL IN EXISTENCE, as well. Therefore, any efforts to impose upon or violate the Individual sovereignty of another makes that violator JUST ANOTHER ATTEMPTED RULER – and, hence, DOES NOT qualify as ANARCHY!

As for your notion of Anarchy being exercised “regardless of political views,” you must learn to shake off such preconceived notions, so that you can open your eyes to the fact that Anarchism is actually apolitical/anti-political (or, as Gerald Celente so aptly describes it, “political atheism”). The words “politics,” and even “policy” and “police,” are all based in the same root word, “polis,” which is the Greek term for “city, one’s city; the state, citizens” – or, as we would understand it, in modern terms, a State-based control grid of rulers and subjects. (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post) →

The Dangers of State-Based Faith

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

J. Edgar Hoover FBI Building

J. Edgar Hoover FBI Building

FBI Admits Flaws in Hair Analysis Over Decades:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/fbi-overstated-forensic-hair-matches-in-nearly-all-criminal-trials-for-decades/2015/04/18/39c8d8c6-e515-11e4-b510-962fcfabc310_story.html

(Washington Post, Spencer S. Hsu) The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.

Of 28 examiners with the FBI Laboratory’s microscopic hair comparison unit, 26 overstated forensic matches in ways that favored prosecutors in more than 95 percent of the 268 trials reviewed so far, according to the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) and the Innocence Project, which are assisting the government with the country’s largest post-conviction review of questioned forensic evidence.

The cases include those of 32 defendants sentenced to death. Of those, 14 have been executed or died in prison, the groups said under an agreement with the government to release results after the review of the first 200 convictions.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Faith in the State, their “Experts” and their “Science” can lead to bodily harm, serious injury, kidnapping, imprisonment, death, or the forced funding of all these things, combined – against the innocent and peaceful ! Please stop selling out humanity to this morally-bankrupt cult of Enslavement, Death and Deception!

Also, while I’m on the topic, it’s high time that y’all Statheists stop hiding behind the lofty label of “Atheist”! You may fool yourselves, and others, but don’t fool us all! Humanity already has a word for those who worship the Accuser!

❤ Power to the Peaceful! ❤

Montel Williams Reveals Himself as Just Another Dangerously Radical, Fanatical Statist

By | |
Leave a comment

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following status update here, posted by Voluntaryist, Larken Rose, and originally shared it to my own wall, along with commentary…

TV personality, Montel Williams

Larken Rose: Wow, Montel Williams has gone full Nazi, basically calling for the National Guard to go in and mass murder the protesters at the Oregon thing. “Oh no! Someone is disobeying my god! SLAUGHTER THEM ALL!” For those Americans worried about Muslims killing non-believers, maybe you should be worried about STATISTS (like Montel Williams), since you are far more likely to be murdered in the name of their god (“government”).

I haven’t commented on the Oregon thing yet, mostly because it’s statists arguing with statists over some dirt. On the bright side, at least it is an example of someone disobeying the political masters. But in the end, I can’t exactly see any real progress coming from flag-waving statists shooting at flag-waving statists. But hey, at least it’s making some state-worshipers (like Montel) show their blind, blood-thirsty allegiance to their political masters. Way to be a loyal house slave, Montel! Kiss the massuh’s ass, and he will be nice to you! Stupid fascist moron.

My Commentary: Statists gonna State!

“Bow down before the one you serve. You’re going to get what you deserve.” 🙂

Are Most Individuals Actually Just Terrorists, or Do Some of Us Hold Our Principles Above “Politics”?

By | |
Leave a comment

The following debate originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “The State is a Terrorist Organization, By Definition!“…

Rayn: By definition, the State is actually a terrorist organization!

‪#‎ThinkAboutItYouMightLearnSomething‬

"Terrorism (noun): the use of violence or intimidation in the pursuit of political aims."

“Terrorism (noun): the use of violence or intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.”

Juan P.: I think this is covers everyone at some point…lol

Rayn: You’ve used violence, or threatened others with it, in the pursuit of your political aims?

Rayn: I’m anti-political, so I don’t engage in this sort of anti-social behavior… (The closest I’ve even remotely come to fitting this description was the one time I voted for president in the 2000 election when I was 19 years old).

As a Voluntaryist, I embrace the Individual Sovereignty (aka self-ownership) of all beings, and adhere to the Non-Aggression principle as a means of securing it! 😉

Juan P.: Let’s just say I’ve tracked terrorist for 15 years and the truth is at any givin time a normal person can commit “terror” acts at any given time. Keep true to you and enjoy life.

Genaire: Juan, I’m not sure about you, but I know I’ve personally never used violence or intimidation in aims of governing others. I may have done said acts in defence of myself or my relatives which however is far different then terrorizing with the intent to control/govern others. I personally don’t know many who have.

Juan P.: l guess it depends on the contexted, to some I may have been called that to others something else. If you question is have I done it of my own accord..no. If i have done it then I can not say on these channels. Have I suffered for it, yes, have I lost friends? Yes.

Genaire: If you haven’t done it under your own accord it doesn’t count. No one blames the military most blame the policies that have lead to the world’s current state.

Juan P.: I guess the problem for me is that all groups, political, religion, idealist, you name it have “political aims” and push the ideas onto others. I like that people have an opinion and want to share. Sadly there is no perfect world and there will always be someone who controls someone, it has happened since the start of time. I will say I love the freedom you and Rayn have and I hope to get there soon.

Rayn: Juan, if what you say is true, and “a normal person can commit ‘terror’ acts at any given time,” then I should consider it even more a badge of honor that most consider me “crazy,” rather than “normal”!

Juan P.: I fear the “normal” person, crazy is more my style anyway.