Are Most Individuals Actually Just Terrorists, or Do Some of Us Hold Our Principles Above “Politics”?

The following debate originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “The State is a Terrorist Organization, By Definition!“…

Rayn: By definition, the State is actually a terrorist organization!

‪#‎ThinkAboutItYouMightLearnSomething‬

"Terrorism (noun): the use of violence or intimidation in the pursuit of political aims."

“Terrorism (noun): the use of violence or intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.”

Juan P.: I think this is covers everyone at some point…lol

Rayn: You’ve used violence, or threatened others with it, in the pursuit of your political aims?

Rayn: I’m anti-political, so I don’t engage in this sort of anti-social behavior… (The closest I’ve even remotely come to fitting this description was the one time I voted for president in the 2000 election when I was 19 years old).

As a Voluntaryist, I embrace the Individual Sovereignty (aka self-ownership) of all beings, and adhere to the Non-Aggression principle as a means of securing it! 😉

Juan P.Let’s just say I’ve tracked terrorist for 15 years and the truth is at any givin time a normal person can commit “terror” acts at any given time. Keep true to you and enjoy life.

Genaire: Juan, I’m not sure about you, but I know I’ve personally never used violence or intimidation in aims of governing others. I may have done said acts in defence of myself or my relatives which however is far different then terrorizing with the intent to control/govern others. I personally don’t know many who have.

Juan P.: l guess it depends on the contexted, to some I may have been called that to others something else. If you question is have I done it of my own accord..no. If i have done it then I can not say on these channels. Have I suffered for it, yes, have I lost friends? Yes.

Genaire: If you haven’t done it under your own accord it doesn’t count. No one blames the military most blame the policies that have lead to the world’s current state.

Juan P.: I guess the problem for me is that all groups, political, religion, idealist, you name it have “political aims” and push the ideas onto others. I like that people have an opinion and want to share. Sadly there is no perfect world and there will always be someone who controls someone, it has happened since the start of time. I will say I love the freedom you and Rayn have and I hope to get there soon.

Rayn: Juan, if what you say is true, and “a normal person can commit ‘terror’ acts at any given time,” then I should consider it even more a badge of honor that most consider me “crazy,” rather than “normal”!

Juan P.: I fear the “normal” person, crazy is more my style anyway.

The State is a Terrorist Organization, By Definition!

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Strictly Voluntary,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"Terrorism (noun): the use of violence or intimidation in the pursuit of political aims."

“Terrorism (noun): the use of violence or intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.”

My Commentary: By definition, the State is actually a terrorist organization!

‪#‎ThinkAboutItYouMightLearnSomething‬

IRONY: Taking a Brief Moment to Celebrate the Revolutionary Nature of Anarchy, While Continuing to Defend the State

I originally posted the following graphic art and statement onto my Facebook wall…

"You must never be fearful about what you are doing when it is right." - Rosa Parks

“You must never be fearful about what you are doing when it is right.” – Rosa Parks

Taking a brief moment to celebrate the revolutionary nature of Anarchy, in between wholeheartedly defending the State as a “lawful authority” and a “necessary evil,” enacted to protect society.

‪#‎JustStatistThings‬

Circular Reasoning, Statist Edition Series: Example 4

I originally posted the following artwork and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

"A social contract is valid because it's the law is valid because it's..."

“A social contract is valid because it’s the law is valid because it’s…”

My CommentaryCircular reasoning: “A social contract is valid because it’s the law is valid because it’s a social contract is valid because it’s the law is valid because it’s a social contract is valid because…” *head spins*

This particular addition to my “Circular Reasoning: Statist Edition” album is timed in perfect synchronicity, as the beautiful follow-up to the debate that ensued on yesterday’s post within this series of photos:

Circular Reasoning: Debate a Statist Edition:
https://acidrayn.com/2015/11/27/circular-reasoning-debate-a-statist-edition/

(note: be sure to check out part 1, part 2, and part 3 of this series)

Circular Reasoning, Statist Edition Series: Example 3

I originally posted the following artwork and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

"The law should be obeyed because it's the..." (Artwork originally located here, upon the Facebook page, "Statism is a Cult")

“The law should be obeyed because it’s the…”
(Artwork originally located here, upon the Facebook page, “Statism is a Cult“)

My CommentaryCircular reasoning: “The law should be obeyed because it’s the law should be obeyed because it’s the law should be obeyed because…” *head spins*

(note: be sure to check out part 1 and part 2 of this series)

(update: this post inspired the following debate, entitled, “Circular Reasoning: Debate a Statist Edition“)