The following article was inspired by my post, “Curse of Adam“, with most scripture references sourced from Word-of-Yah.org using the TS2009 translation.…
(Special thanks to my sister in Yeshua Mashiyach, Flora, for pointing out the root connection between ‘marriage’ and ‘ba’al’, among other considerations, and to my assembly, Kingdom of Heaven, for many edifying discussions that helped shape this work.)
In the beginning, matrimony was never a hierarchy of master and possession. It was a covenant of shared substance. When YHWH brings the woman to the man in Genesis 2, the man’s response is not a claim of ownership — it’s a recognition of identity: “This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman [אשׁה, ishshah], because she was taken out of Man [אישׁ, ish]” (Genesis 2:23). The two words are not separate categories of “owner” and “owned” — ishshah is the feminine form of ish. The text is built on a grammar of sameness, and it ends not with a transaction but with union: “they shall become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24). Scripture soon supplies the very word for how that union is enacted: יָדַע, yada, “to know.” “Adam knew [yada] Chawwah his wife, and she conceived” (Genesis 4:1). Yada is not a euphemism reaching for a word the language lacked — it is the ordinary Hebrew term for knowing a person or a fact, applied here, without embarrassment, to the most intimate act two people share. The vocabulary makes no distinction between the physical and the personal the way a modern reader might expect one; to know a spouse in this grammar is at once to be joined in body and disclosed in self, one word carrying both. That word will carry the same weight forward, later in Scripture, into how YHWH describes being known by His own people.
(Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)
WN W
®LD: According to an insider source, “Chud the Builder” is the ultimate “trad”, preferring the “pure” love of men to the “weak” love of women – with love between two men signifying the “perfect love”. In his private life, he’s allegedly been promoting and practicing a timeless form of homosɛxuality that extends all the way back to Greek antiquity. Indeed, Greek philosophers like Plato argued that relationships with women were driven by mere bodily appetite and the biological necessity of procreation with an otherwise inferior being. By contrast, romantic relationships between men (or an older mentor and a youth) were viewed as intellectual and spiritual. This love was considered superior because it was based on shared virtue, philosophy, and the pursuit of truth rather than base necessity. To the intellectual elite of Classical Athens, the highest form of love—called “Heavenly Aphrodite” (Aphrodite Ourania)—was believed to exist only between males because they viewed men as superior to women.
