As the political campaigns of both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump continue in the United States, the battle for presidency has begun to resemble reality television more than genuine politics.
Statements are made, stances taken, and arguments ignited that all seem far too scripted and controversial to have occurred organically. Whether or not this is the case, we as a collective have fully bought into it, as this first presidential debate broke viewership records, with 84 million tuning in to the “interesting” spar, according to Nielsen.
While both presidential hopefuls have already endured significant scrutiny, it appears as though Hillary Clinton may be in line for the next devastating blow, though she has already been victimized by the stealthy work of Julian Assange on several occasions:
(Ben Hubbard) Throughout President Obama’s time in the White House, Saudi Arabia and its allies in the Persian Gulf have watched with dismay as the kingdom’s decades-old alliance with the United States seemed to be slipping.
Then came the overwhelming congressional support for Jasta, or the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, which will allow relatives of those killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to sue Saudi Arabia for any suspected role in the plot.
That was all the proof many Saudis needed that the alliance that has underpinned the regional order for decades was fraying — perhaps irreparably.
Tammy S.: Is that possible?! No! Don’t send your kids, you’ll regret it!
Diana B.: you have got to be fukken kidding me
Rayn: In Pathocratic America, murdering children is viewed as a respectable and successful business model, to be replicated on a grand scale, whenever possible. Just look at how popular Obama is, even though he daily signs off on the death warrants of countless scores of foreign babies.
Diana B.: abortion is also state sponsored. how many american babies are being cut down with state govnt $$$$
Rayn: Indeed! Obama even recently allocated more funding to the Planned Parenthood eugenics program, and the left cheered it as a victory…
“Birth Control is not contraception indiscriminately and thoughtlessly practiced. It means the release and cultivation of the better racial elements in our society, and the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extirpation of defective stocks — those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.” – Margaret Sanger, FOUNDER of Planned Parenthood, and Lifelong Genocidal Eugenicist
Diana B.: SMFH how do all these so-called open minded people feed into the bull$hit?!??!??!?!
Diana B.: by the way, margaret sanger is killary’s idol! 😕
Diana B.: sickening. human life has become so cheap….
Diana B.: or maybe its always been that way? 😕
Rayn: “We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. And the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” – Margaret Sanger, FOUNDER of Planned Parenthood, and Lifelong Genocidal Eugenicist
(According to the leftists, this paragraph is being taken out of context, and Sanger just wanted to help “negroes” take control of their reproductive rights… through a condescending brainwashing campaign, using paid shills peddling religious trickery… you know… “for their own good”?)
Rayn: Killary is a lizard, to be sure!
Diana B.: Fukin sick! How is this shit still happening in 2016?!?
Rayn: The loudest among humanity appear to be the most historically-illiterate, morally-bankrupt, and yet, strongly-opinionated. And, they gleefully shout down into compliance all those who are too polite, meek, or respectful to challenge the many falsehoods, horrors and fantasies being spewed, as though the volume of their voice, or the resulting silence it elicits, somehow represents evidence of superior logic..
Meanwhile, any time a slick-talking, confident sociopath comes along claiming crimes against humanity to be “scientific,” or “legal,” or “necessary,” way too many are quick to drop to their knees, and eagerly swallow it down…
The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of my friend, Natalie M…
Natalie M.: He is really starting to get on my nerves! Telling the black Americans to vote while he is aggressively trying to pass trans-Pacific partnership trade agreement (TPP) during the lame duck. Tpp screws over the American people and gives more power to corporations.
(Peter White) After more than two decades of continuous war against countries we bombed with which we were officially at peace, and then invaded, and after millions have been killed and after billions have been spent to finance America’s illegal wars, we are no safer than we were before 9-11 and the world is facing the greatest refugee and worst humanitarian crisis since WW II. The United States is to blame for these wars of atrocity and the American political class that promulgated them are war criminals. In short, we Americans are the new Nazis of the world disorder.
Reports by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), Mother Jones, and Time put the costs of American adventurism at about $1.6 trillion dollars. Other reports have estimated the cost of US wars since 9/11 to be far higher, between $4 -$7 trillion. According to MJ, “a report by Neta Crawford, a political science professor at Boston University, estimated the total cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan—as well as post-2001 assistance to Pakistan—to be roughly $4.4 trillion. The CRS estimate is lower because it does not include additional costs including the lifetime price of health care for disabled veterans and interest on the national debt.”
Excerpts from book: “You know, it doesn’t make people close to their government to be told that this is a people’s government, a true democracy, or to be enrolled in civilian defense, or even to vote. All this has little, really nothing, to do with knowing one is governing…
“What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could not understand it, it could not be released because of national security…
“This separation of government from people, this widening of the gap, took place so gradually and so insensibly, each step disguised (perhaps not even intentionally) as a temporary emergency measure or associated with true patriotic allegiance or with real social purposes. And all the crises and reforms (real reforms, too) so occupied the people that they did not see the slow motion underneath, of the whole process of government growing remoter and remoter…”
