Horizontal Enforcement, for the Win!

By | |
Leave a comment

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Anarchists of Pakistan,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

“In recognition of your tireless efforts to defend those who subjugate and exploit you, and your ongoing devotion to fabricating excuses and justificatgions for both your own enslavement and the enslavement of your fellow man, you, _____________ are hereby awarded this Stockholm Syndrome Merit Badge
Know that you have earned the gratitude and heartfelt thanks of narcissistic megalomaniacs the world over, for helping them to enrich and empower themselves at the expense of everyone else.”

My Commentary: Horizontal enforcement, for the win!

Mainstream Media Monopoly Continues to Publish Most Widely-Read Fake News Available

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Why Has Trust in Media Collapsed? Look at Actions of WSJ, Yahoo, Business Insider and Slate.:
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/30/why-has-trust-in-media-collapsed-look-at-actions-of-wsj-yahoo-business-insider-and-slate/

() Last week, we published documents that definitively debunked and disproved a claim that numerous media outlets had circulated and affirmed for years: that Edward Snowden lied about where he was during his first 11 days in Hong Kong. Contrary to the fable these outlets dispensed to their readers — that Snowden did not check in to the Mira Hotel on May 21 as he claimed but only did so on June 1, 11 days later — these new documents, obtained from the Mira, prove that Snowden arrived there exactly when he always said, rendering their published stories factually false. Many of these stories had even claimed that anonymous U.S. investigators were unable to find hotel or credit card records for Snowden during these 11 days — exactly the records we just published.

The same day our story was published, the New York Times reporter Charlie Savage — who had previously spent weeks documenting that this claim about Snowden never had any journalistic basis to begin with — confirmed the authenticity of the new documents…

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: The mainstream media monopoly continues to publish the most widely-read fake news available, while simultaneously claiming the ability to determine what’s “real.”

Government Provides Legal Means to Launder Criminality

By | |
Leave a comment

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Emancipated Human,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

“Taking somebody’s money without permission is stealing, unless you work for the IRS; then it’s taxation. Killing people en masse is homicidal mania, unless you work for the Army; then it’s National Defense. Spying on your neighbors is invasion of privacy, unless you work for the FBI; then it’s National Security. Running a whorehouse makes you a pimp and poisoning people makes you a murderer, unless you work for the CIA; then it’s counter-intelligence.” – Robert Anton Wilson

My Commentary: Laundering criminality…

Discussing NY Assemblywoman’s Introduction of Tyrannical Legislation to Enforce Mandatory Voting Through Use of Penalty Fee

By | |
Leave a comment

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “NY Assemblywoman Introduces Tyrannical Legislation to Enforce Mandatory Voting Through Use of Penalty Fee“…

Democratic Assemblywoman and tyrant, Deborah Glick

Rayn: Manufacturing the “consent of the governed” through penalty fees… Seems legit…

New Yorkers Who Don’t Vote Would Pay $10 Fine Under Assemblywoman’s Bill:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/new-yorkers-don-vote-pay-10-proposed-bill-article-1.3001499

Steve K.: If true, it would be unconstitutional, violates the 1st amendment for one thing. Not voting is one way of protesting.

Rayn: Indeed! Penalizing those New Yorkers who choose to Vacate The Vote in an effort to Withdraw Consent is not only an assault against free speech, and freedom of choice – it also represents a shameless effort to run an extortion racket, too! These political parasites are nothing more than a legally-protected criminal caste!

State Eagerly Exploits Isolated Consent Case to Enact Collective Coercion Upon Entire Community

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Bans on Bondage and Spanking During Sex Could Be OK, Says Federal Court:
http://reason.com/blog/2016/03/07/bdsm-sex-ban-is-constitutional

() Uh-oh, kinksters: sex cops could be coming for you next. According to a new federal court decision, Americans have no constitutional right to engage in consensual BDSM because “sexual activity that involves binding and gagging or the use of physical force such as spanking or choking poses certain inherent risks to personal safety.” Thus officials could constitutionally ban or regulate such activity in the interest of “the protection of vulnerable persons,” the court held.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: FLASHBACK 2016: Last year, due to a single case of alleged abuse, the creepy control-freaking legislators in State of Virginia handed themselves the right to restrict the private consensual sexual activity of all residents… for their own safety, of course! Ironically, they eagerly exploited an isolated issue of consent in order to enact collective coercion upon the entire community.

According to the ruling, “a legislative restriction on BDSM activity is justifiable by reference to the state’s interest in the protection of vulnerable persons, i.e. sexual partners placed in situations with an elevated risk of physical harm.
[…]
“Sexual activity that involves binding and gagging or the use of physical force such as spanking or choking poses certain inherent risks to personal safety not present in more traditional types of sexual activity. Thus, as inCruzan and Glucksberg, a legislative restriction on BDSM activity is justifiable by reference to the state’s interest in the protection of vulnerable persons, i.e. sexual partners placed in situations with an elevated risk of physical harm.”