Manipulative Mainstream Media Monopoly Continues to Falsely Portray Anarchism as Form of Criminality

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by anarchist, Adam Kokesh, and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

“Real anarchists don’t wave flags and don’t wear uniforms” (TheFreedomLine.com)

My CommentaryLegitimate Anarchists Adhere to a Peaceful, Principled, Anti-Political Philosophy of Freedom!
http://acidrayn.com/2016/11/12/legitimate-anarchists-adhere-to-a-peaceful-principled-anti-political-philosophy-of-freedom/

And, we absolutely do not initiate violence upon others, nor destroy property that isn’t ours!

If these sorts of COERCIVE activities are taking place against persons or their property, by definition, anarchy is not occurring!

anarchy: (n): without a ruler
(From Greek anarkhia, from anarkhos, from an- ‘without’ + arkhos ‘chief, ruler’)

The words you’re looking for to describe these sociopathic behaviors are “criminality” and “rulership.”

The only reason to toss the word “anarchy” into the mix is out of ignorance, or to discredit and smear LEGITIMATE anarchists, who adhere to a peaceful, principled, anti-political philosophy of freedom!

Legitimate Anarchists Adhere to a Peaceful, Principled, Anti-Political Philosophy of Freedom!

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Anarchista Musings,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"The media's depiction of anarchists Actual anarchists"

“The media’s depiction of an anarchist
Actual anarchists”

My Commentary: Nice try, criminal scum, operating with the support of the mainstream media monopoly! While you’re busy co-opting and misappropriating the word, “anarchy,” and falsely defining it to mean “chaos,” I’ll provide some helpful tips to help my Statist friends sort things out:

Without CONSENT, anarchy is NOT taking place!
——————————-or——————————–
If COERCION is taking place, it is not anarchy!

Here’s the original definition of “anarchy,” including etymology. All efforts to change this simple, concise explanation can be summed up as a fear-monger-motivated hijacking of the word!

anarchy: (n): without a ruler
(From Greek anarkhia, from anarkhos, from an- ‘without’ + arkhos ‘chief, ruler’)

There is almost no other word in the English language that so easily defines this concept, with a history stretching back for almost half a millennium! The word Voluntaryism is a much more recent attempt (being only about a century old) to reinvent the stolen word, with the implied understanding that “anarchy” is purposefully being robbed of its meaning.

As you can see, what is taking place in the top picture below can already be defined in so many ways – from “chaos,” to “lawlessness,” to “vandalism,” to “criminality”… the list goes on. The only reason to toss the word “anarchy” into the mix is out of ignorance, or to discredit and smear LEGITIMATE anarchists, who adhere to a peaceful, principled, anti-political philosophy of freedom!

Individualism Has More Value Than Collectivism

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Strictly Voluntary,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"I ❤ Individualism"

“I ❤ Individualism”

My Commentary: Individualism > Collectivism

The Irony of Statists Telling Anarchists to “Stop Forcing Their Politics On Them”

The following correspondence originally took place here, upon the Facebook page, “Government Does Not Exist“…

Government Does Not Exist:

"When a Statist Tells an Anarchist To Stop Forcing Their Politics on to Them"

“When a Statist Tells an Anarchist
To Stop Forcing Their Politics on to Them”

Rayn: Indeed! These types of Statists are some of the most intellectually dishonest, around!

I’ve actually been told, and I quote, “As a True Believer (TM) of your own chosen ideology you apparently project rigid, dogmatic inflexibility onto everyone who disagrees with you.”

My reply was lengthy, but here’s how it began… “As a true believer in your own chosen ideology of Statism, YOU project your rigid, dogmatic inflexible, not too mention violent and murderous, tyranny over your fellow man, because you don’t trust anyone but the sociopaths you elect into office, who rob you to live lavishly, while putting innocent human beings in cages for victimless crimes, like possession of non-toxic plants, while bombing women and children, overseas, with the ill-begotten tax funds that take from us all. Calling Voluntaryism, which is the freedom and peace of consensual relations between Sovereign Individuals, ‘rigid, dogmatic inflexible’ ideology completely discredits you, like usual. Keep licking those boots, and eating dust, my friend! 🙂

You can read the whole correspondence, here, if you’re in the mood for a laugh:

Exposing the Retrogressive Left:
http://acidrayn.com/2016/04/19/exposing-the-retrogressive-left/

Ms. Lauryn Hill and Lysander Spooner: A Match Made by the IRS

The following debate originally took place here, upon the Facebook wall of Ms. Lauryn Hill, after I posted a captioned photo being shared by the page, “Strictly Voluntary,” along with a comment of my own…

Rayn: Check it out, Ms. Lauryn Hill! Voluntaryists understand your position, all too well! Taxation is Theft!

Artwork originally located here, upon the Facebook page, "Voluntary"

Ms.Hill in part of her statement to the tax judge: “I had an economic system imposed on me.”

Ms.Hill was caught in the trap that Lysander Spooner wrote of over a century ago:
“And yet we have what purports, or professes, or is claimed, to be a contract—the Constitution—made eighty years ago, by men who are now all dead, and who never had any power to bind us, but which (it is claimed) has nevertheless bound three generations of men, consisting of many millions, and which (it is claimed) will be binding upon all the millions that are to come; but which nobody ever signed, sealed, delivered, witnessed, or acknowledged; and which few persons, compared with the whole number that are claimed to be bound by it, have ever read, or even seen, or ever will read, or see.” ― Lysander Spooner, No Treason: The Constitution Of No Authority

No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority | by Lysander Spooner:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWESql2dXoc

Murray N. Rothbard considered this essay by Lysander Spooner (1867) “The greatest case for anarchist political philosophy ever written.”

Lauryn Hill – War in the Mind (Unplugged): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze8cFpZ0WHg

#LaurynHill #Spooner #NoTreason #WithdrawConsent #EndStatism #StrictlyVoluntary

(Artwork originally located here, upon the Facebook page, “Strictly Voluntary“)

Jahgreen R.: is it like she wants to be free to express her childhood’s homeworks mistakes now that she is an adult??? I today realize what that word means which she spoke in a poem in London way back in 2005: “What an abracaration!!!” -aryist[s], what about -ist[s]!!! I am a voluntarist if I’m not gonna be a volunteer, but not for grammar mistakes, what’s fucked up with you??!!! Who were you sent by? You amp up not being with you!! Now you’re gonna complain why y’all’re not loving me? but, come on, you………………..repulse

Rayn: My apologies, but I’ve read your comment multiple times, and simply I can’t make out what you’re trying to say within it… Can you please clarify?

Jahgreen R.: A flabbiness spray for Lauren to put in a bubble. She needs to understand, anyone who earns more than average must pay taxes, that’s also accepting the luck could have been someone else’s to put in light out of the many poors who have talent in any other field but will never be able to access. Why wouldn’t the poor be able to receive from the wealthiest in partnerships funds, professional welfare like she ain’t ready to do so? Trust it or not, only the wind has got the answer to this question ; she’ll just have to follow the majority.

Rayn: Nope… Individuals cannot simply relegate rights which they don’t have, themselves, to others, no matter how much they imagine that such activity would somehow eliminate the lack of morality inherent to the unjust acts they seek to commit, by proxy – nor will it relinquish them of personal responsibility for the acts now being committed in their name. Since you and I have no right to take money from others without their consent, neither does the State! It wouldn’t matter if we tossed out the claim that it was for the “greater good,” or if we used some of the stolen money to buy our victim a service he also didn’t consent to, as we pocketed some for ourselves as payment for arranging said service. It would be a criminal act, regardless. It’s probably disappointing to hear this, if you’re a member of the Statist cult, but… yeah… true morality is universal, like that.

Taxation is Theft, and Taxation is Extortion. To those who advocate such theft under the guise of “helping the poor” with stolen funds, I say, “Check Your Statist Privilege,” my friend! (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)