Tag Archives: defense

In Face of Blue Privilege Corruption, Resist State-Run Gun Control

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Cop Amber Guyger Is One Reason We Need Private Gun Ownership:
https://mises.org/power-market/cop-amber-guyger-one-reason-we-need-private-gun-ownership

(Ryan McMaken) When advocates of gun confiscation complain about “guns” and say “no one needs a gun for x” all they are really saying — whether they understand it or not — is “I want only cops and soldiers to have guns.”

While gun control advocates often claim to be suspicious of police power, logic dictates that the gun-confiscation position is simply the position that only government employees should have guns. Similarly, more mild gun-regulation positions are designed to increase the coercive power of government over the taxpaying citizenry, and to lessen access to private sources of self-defense — thus increasing private-sector dependence on government police for “protection.”  The gun-regulation position is premised on the idea that only the police can really be trusted with gun ownership.

And what a terrible position that is.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Only a mindless drone would push for State-run gun control in this climate of murderous Blue Privilege…

Gun-Free Zones Only Enable and Embolden Mass Shooters

By | |
Leave a comment

The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of my friend, Jonas A…

Jonas A.: This dude does have a very good point…that’s why random shooters don’t target police stations….

Concealed Carry + Mass Shooting = More Carnage?:

Rayn:  Gun-Free Zone = Guaranteed 100% Defenseless Victims

“Gun-Free Zone Guaranteed 100% Defenseless Victims”

Brian K.: You seem to assume that guns are the only means of defense

Rielly J.: I myself am a libertarian thus I embrace the non aggression principal so it’s obvious that I support gun ownership. The thing that differentiates the non aggression principal from pacifism is that it does not preclude violence as a form of self defense or the defense of others.

Jonas A.: Very true….weapons of any kind should only be used as self defense…nothing should deviate from my libertarian principles either!

David C.: this dude knows whats up. thanks for sharing this!

Rielly J.: The non aggression principal is even incorporated in to our national seal: the eagle holds 13 arrows (the symbol of war) in one talon and an olive branch in the other and it is looking over the olive branch. We are supposed to be a nation that prefers peace but is comfortable with war (although this is not how we have been since the late 80s)

Jonas A.: You’re most welcome! And yeah, non-aggression as defined by the national seal or our constitution should not be a piece of paper, which is what current admins have been doing since Reagan…