Author Archives: Rayn

Discussing Seizure of China-Made Pills Filled with Powdered Human Baby Flesh

By | |
Leave a comment

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Since Last Year, South Korean Customs Officials Have Seized Thousands of China-Made Pills Filled with Powdered Human Baby Flesh“…

China-Made “Miracle Pills” Seized by South Korean Customs Officials Consist of 99.7% Powdered Flesh of Dead Human Babies

China-Made “Miracle Pills” Seized by South Korean Customs Officials Consist of 99.7% Powdered Flesh of Dead Human Babies

Rayn: Most have chosen the “head in sand” pose, dismissing these sorts of stories as “myth” without so much as a modicum of research. Few understand just how much the grisly, abominable “one child policy” of China’s government is responsible for this zero-value on human life policy, and black-market trafficking in aborted human fetal remains!

As Female Infanticide Skyrockets Under Deadly “One Child” Policy, China’s Wealthy Eat Human Baby As Delicacy:
http://acidrayn.com/2011/04/23/chinese-eat-human-baby-soup-to-enhance-sexual-performance/

China is home to AT LEAST 13 MILLION abortions a year….
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8175864.stm

Sara: Jesus Christ, I just vomited in my mouth.

Simon P.: Oh snap.

Rayn: These sorts of dangers lurk on the horizon, even as the cowards-that-be tell in the Western world tell us to watch out for “terrorists” so that they can strip us of our human rights, much like Communist China!!! And, those in power would LOVE for the world to adopt China’s death-system, pushing the idea again and again in order to “manufacture” public consent:

CNN Founder & Media Mogul Billionaire Ted Turner* Urges World Leaders to Adopt China’s “One Child” Policy:
http://www.businessinsider.com/ted-turner-urges-world-leaders-to-adopt-chinas-one-child-policy-on-global-scale-2010-12
*Note that Turner himself is a father of five children.

A Real Inconvenient Truth: Diane Francis, Financial Post:
http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2314438

Environmentalists Call for One-Child Policy:
http://www.theage.com.au/national/call-for-onechild-policy-20090421-ae3l.html

Sara: Holy shit, Ted Turner, really?

Sara: What a pig.

Rayn: Ted Turner is just another ultra-wealthy elitist f*cking mummy. He’s completely dead inside, and far removed from society and reality…

Bombing Civilians Equals Just Another Day of Business for the American Empire

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Afghani funeral

Afghani funeral

U.S. Confirms Afghan Airstrike Mistake:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/world/asia/united-states-confirms-airstrike-wrongly-killed-afghan-family-members.html

(Rod Norland) The American military claimed responsibility and expressed regret for an airstrike that mistakenly killed six members of a family in southwestern Afghanistan, Afghan and American military officials confirmed Monday.

The attack, which took place Friday night, was first revealed by the governor of Helmand Province, Muhammad Gulab Mangal, on Monday. His spokesman, Dawoud Ahmadi, said that after an investigation they had determined that a family home in the Sangin district had been attacked by mistake in the American airstrike, which was called in to respond to a Taliban attack.

Mr. Mangal summoned the American regional commander, Maj. Gen. Charles M. Gurganus of the Marines, to complain, and General Gurganus apologized, Mr. Ahmadi said.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Just another day of business for the Empire…

Questioning the Motives Behind the American Invasion of Afghanistan:
http://acidrayn.com/2009/12/18/questioning-the-motives-behind-the-american-invasion-of-afghanistan/

Under Obama, America’s Military Empire Continues to Expand:
http://acidrayn.com/2009/12/18/under-obama-americas-military-empire-continues-to-expand/

Continue the Oppressive Cycle of Violence, or Embrace the Non-Aggression Principle?

By | |
1 Comment

The following debate originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Violence is the Language of the Oppressor!“…

Rayn: The Non-Aggression Principle is the foundation of True Peace! Violence is the language of the Oppressor, and “the last refuge of the incompetent.” Those who follow after Cain will indeed find themselves among their brethren… in the Pit!

Oh, you believe in violent revolution? Tell me about how your use of violence is different than the State's use of violence?

Oh, you believe in violent revolution? Tell me about how your use of violence is different than the State’s use of violence?

Adam G.: My violence is different from the state’s because I am protecting myself. If you can’t see the difference, then you either have a metric fucktonne of privielge or don’t pay attention.

Rayn: Hmmm… To begin, Adam, if you can’t see the difference between physical self-defense and violent revolution… please let me know, and I will be more than happy to explain! I would never deny another the right to physical self-defense in the event of an immediate threat of violence. That is a personal CHOICE, to be made with respect to each situation, even. 🙂

Second, you have committed three logical fallacies in your conclusion. (1) The False Dichotomy: There are many more reasons than the two you have presented to explain why I would be unable to see difference between “[your] violence” versus the State’s use of it. (2) An Ad Hominem Attack: Claiming me to have either a “metric fucktonne of privilege  or to be “not paying attention” are unsubstantiated personal jabs at me, and do nothing to further an explanation of your position, and really only support your last error, (3) An Appeal to Ridicule: Mocking what you believe is my position does nothing to explain your position. This is true, regardless of what form of mockery you engage in, really.

I will be happy to continue this discussion with you, but you must stay on track. Let’s share ideas. I enjoy it. Also, be sure to let me know if you are referring to physical self-defense, or violent revolution, when you mention “[your] violence,” as I am not sure, since your wording leaves much room to interpret “protecting [your]self” as self-defense, especially since you did not elaborate on your position whatsoever, and presented an Appeal to Ridicule. To me, this means that we might just be dealing with a matter of semantics, here. 🙂

Wall Street Funded Lenin, Trotsky and Even Hitler!

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted this LibertyStickers.com artwork here, onto the Facebook page, “Liberty Stickers,” along with commentary…

“Wall $treet Funded Lenin and Trotsky”

My Commentary: “Wall $treet Funded Lenin and Trotsky”

And, Hitler, too:

Banking with Hitler:

As John F. Kennedy said, “for we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.”

Violence is the Language of the Oppressor!

By | |
1 Comment

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Liberty 3VOLution,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"Oh, you believe in violent revolution? Tell me about how your use of violence is different than the State's use of violence?"

“Oh, you believe in violent revolution? Tell me about how your use of violence is different than the State’s use of violence?”

My Commentary: The Non-Aggression Principle is the foundation of True Peace! Violence is the language of the Oppressor, and “the last refuge of the incompetent.” Those who follow after Cain will indeed find themselves among their brethren… in the Pit!

(*update*: this posting sparked the debate, “Continue the Oppressive Cycle of Violence, or Embrace the Non-Aggression Principle?” Check it out!)