One Flesh, Not One Master: How ‘Ba’al’ Was Used to Smuggle Ownership Into Matrimony

The following article was inspired by my post, “Curse of Adam“, with most scripture references sourced from Word-of-Yah.org using the The Scriptures 2009 (TS2009) translation.

(Special thanks to my sister in Yeshua Mashiyach, Flora, for pointing out the root connection between ‘marriage’ and ‘ba’al’, among other considerations, and to my family at Kingdom of Heaven Assembly for many edifying discussions that helped shape this work.)

In the beginning, matrimony was never a hierarchy of master and possession. It was a covenant of shared substance. When YHWH brings the woman to the man in Genesis 2, the man’s response is not a claim of ownership — it’s a recognition of identity: “This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman [אשׁה, ishshah], because she was taken out of Man [אישׁ, ish]” (Genesis 2:23). The two words are not separate categories of “owner” and “owned” — ishshah is the feminine form of ish. The text is built on a grammar of sameness, and it ends not with a transaction but with union: “they shall become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24). Scripture soon supplies the very word for how that union is enacted: יָדַע, yada, “to know.” “Adam knew [yada] Chawwah [Eve] his wife, and she conceived” (Genesis 4:1). Yada is not a euphemism reaching for a word the language lacked — it is the ordinary Hebrew term for knowing a person or a fact, applied here, without embarrassment, to the most intimate act two people share. The vocabulary makes no distinction between the physical and the personal way a modern reader might expect one; to know a spouse in this grammar is at once to be joined in body and disclosed in self, one word carrying both. That word will carry the same weight forward, later in Scripture, into how YHWH describes being known by His own people.

(Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)

Statism: Penalizing Marriage While Incentivizing “Shacking Up”

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

2016-08-04-statism-penalizing-marriage-while-incentivizing-shacking-up

IRS Increases “Marriage Penalty,” Unmarried Cohabitants To Get Twice The Mortgage Interest Deduction:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonynitti/2016/08/01/irs-increases-marriage-penalty-unmarried-cohabitants-to-get-twice-the-mortgage-interest-deduction/

(Tony Nitti) There are a thousand good reasons to never get married: in-laws, divorce attorneys, and the inevitable ravages of age on one’s attractiveness come immediately to mind.

But there are also significant tax hits that come with getting hitched, or as they’ve collectively been coined, the “marriage penalty.” For example, the 28% tax bracket kicks in at $91,150 of income if you’re single, but at only $151,900 — an amount basic math tells you is less than double $91,150 — for married taxpayers. In addition, single taxpayers start to lose 3% of itemized deductions when adjusted gross income exceeds $258,250; married taxpayers, however, will lose itemized deductions once adjusted gross income exceeds only $309,900.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Statism: penalizing marriage while incentivizing “shacking up.”

Love Conquers Hate!

The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of an acquaintance, after they shared a photo from here

Sri A.: They married in spite of the brutal threats from Israelis. One way to stop the occupation is to marry each other. You can then have your own fights without murdering Palestinians. She is Jewish Israeli, he is Palestinian Muslim.

Rayn

The Apartheid State of Marriage in Israel

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

The "Am I legally allowed to marry in Israel?" flowchart

The “Am I legally allowed to marry in Israel?” flowchart

Who Would You Be Allowed to Marry in Israel Today?
http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/shavuot/.premium-1.596576

(Ariel David, Haaretz) On the website of Hiddush, a nonprofit organization that promotes religious freedom and equality in Israel, there is a world map showing countries that restrict freedom of marriage. The countries given as imposing “severe restrictions” include most states between Morocco to the west and Pakistan to the east. And Israel is no exception.

Marriage in the Jewish state is a complex matter, and is almost entirely under the purview of religious authorities.

There is no civil marriage. Jews can only be married in a religious ceremony, by an Orthodox rabbi under the authority of the Chief Rabbinate, the top religious authority for Jews in Israel. This means there is also no interfaith marriage between Jews and non-Jews, since Orthodox Judaism does not allow mixed unions. Israelis who belong to other streams of Judaism, such as Reform or Conservative, must still tie the knot in front of an Orthodox rabbi in a traditional ceremony if they want their marriage to be recognized by the state.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Repeat after me: Israel IS NOT an Apartheid State! 😉