Tag Archives: Abuse of Power

Suspicious Orange Leather Bag Promotes Warrantless Searches for All Americans

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Suspicious orange leather bag releases gas

Suspicious orange leather bag releases gas

Donald Trump: We Need More Stop-and-Frisk:
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/peace-and-prosperity/2016/september/05/donald-trump-we-need-more-stop-and-frisk/

(Adam Dick) In his main stage speech at the Republican National Convention in July, Rudy Giuliani, a former New York City mayor and current advisor to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, predicted, “What I did for New York, Donald Trump Will do for America.” That does seem to accurately state Trump’s intention, at least as far as expanding Giuliani’s stop-and-frisk police activity across the country is concerned.

On Friday, NBC10 reporter Lauren Mayk asked Trump what police in Philadelphia “are not doing that they could be doing” for dealing with “gun violence,” Trump’s response included asserting that “stop-and-frisk,” which Trump credits to Giuliani, “is a very positive thing.” This is not just some one-off statement by Trump regarding stop-and-frisk. In July of 2013, Trump posted the following message on Twitter:

Stop and frisk works. Instead of criticizing @NY_POLICE Chief Ray Kelly, New Yorkers should be thanking him for keeping NY safe.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Suspicious orange leather bag promotes warrantless searches…

Discussing the Complete Abuse of Law in Charging Teen With Sexually Exploiting Himself for Possessing Nude Photos of Self on His Phone

By | |
Leave a comment

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “In Complete Abuse of Law, North Carolina Teen Charged With Sexually Exploiting Himself for Possessing Nude Photos of Self on His Phone“…

Teen victim of legal injustice, Cormega Copening

Teen victim of legal injustice, Cormega Copening

Rayn: Brilliant… *facepalm*

Teen Boy Will Be Charged As Adult For Having Naked Pics of a Minor: Himself:
http://reason.com/blog/2015/09/02/teen-boy-will-be-charged-as-adult-for-ha

Jonas A.: 😮 😮

In Complete Abuse of Law, North Carolina Teen Charged With Sexually Exploiting Himself for Possessing Nude Photos of Self on His Phone

By | |
1 Comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Teen victim of legal injustice, Cormega Copening

Teen victim of legal injustice, Cormega Copening

Teen Boy Will Be Charged As Adult For Having Naked Pics of a Minor: Himself:
http://reason.com/blog/2015/09/02/teen-boy-will-be-charged-as-adult-for-ha

() A North Carolina 17-year-old caught in a sexting scandal faces charges of sexually exploiting a minor that could land him in jail for up to 10 years, since the law considers him an adult. But one of the minors he supposedly exploited is himself­—which raises an obvious question: how can a teen be old enough to face adult felony charges, but not old enough to keep a nude picture of himself on his phone?

Unfortunately, that’s the Kafka-esque nightmare in which Fayetteville-area high schooler Cormega Copening finds himself after exchanging private nude photos with his girlfriend—with whom he is legally allowed to have sex, but not to sext.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Brilliant… *facepalm*

Democrats and Republicans Merely Represent Two Sides of the Same Coin of Tyranny

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

2016-09-05-democrats-and-republicans-merely-represent-two-sides-of-the-same-coin-of-tyranny

Clinton’s 700-Mile Border Fence Is Just 300 Miles Shorter Than Trump’s:
http://reason.com/blog/2016/09/01/clintons-700-mile-border-fence-is-just-3

() Who (besides libertarians) would have figured that the 2016 election is really an extended case study in what Freud termed “the narcissism of small differences,” or “the phenenomen is the phenomenon that it is precisely communities with adjoining territories, and that are related to each other in other ways as well, who are engaged in constant feuds and are ridiculing each other because of sensitiveness to these details of differentiation”?

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Same Shit. Different Pile.

Never Forget… Institutionalized Eugenics in America

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and statement onto my Facebook wall…

"Buck v. Bell: In 1925, Virginia, like a majority of states then, enacted eugenic sterilization laws. Viriginia's law allowed state institutions to operate on individuals to prevent conception of what were believed to be 'genetically inferior' children. Charlottesville native, Carrie Buck (1906 - 1983), involuntarily committed to a state facility near Lynchburg, was chosen as the first person to be sterilized under the law. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Buck v. Bell, on 2 May 1927, affirmed the Virginia law. After Buck, mor than 8,000 other Virginians were sterlized before the most relevant parts of the act were repealed in 1974. Later evidence eventually showed that Buck and many others had no 'hereditary defects.' She is buried south of here." (Department of Historic Resources, 2002)

“Buck v. Bell: In 1925, Virginia, like a majority of states then, enacted eugenic sterilization laws. Viriginia’s law allowed state institutions to operate on individuals to prevent conception of what were believed to be ‘genetically inferior’ children. Charlottesville native, Carrie Buck (1906 – 1983), involuntarily committed to a state facility near Lynchburg, was chosen as the first person to be sterilized under the law. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Buck v. Bell, on 2 May 1927, affirmed the Virginia law. After Buck, mor than 8,000 other Virginians were sterlized before the most relevant parts of the act were repealed in 1974. Later evidence eventually showed that Buck and many others had no ‘hereditary defects.’ She is buried south of here.” (Department of Historic Resources, 2002)

Buck v. Bell:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_v._Bell

Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, “for the protection and health of the state” did not violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The decision was largely seen as an endorsement of negative eugenics—the attempt to improve the human race by eliminating “defectives” from the gene pool. The Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell.

(Read entire article here…)

Never forget…