Shabath Shalum! Happy Pesach! Baruk HaShem Yahuah! Halalu Yahusha!

I originally posted the following statement, along with artwork from the page, “Love is a Verb,” onto my Facebook wall…

"Shabat(h) Shal(u)m"

“Shabat(h) Shal(u)m”

My Commentary: Shabath Shalum! Happy Pesach! Halalu Yahusha, our Mashiach, for making the ultimate sacrifice to expose the murderous, torturous slave-system of the Accuser before the eyes of the whole Earth, for all generations to witness, in the Name of Yahuwah! Baruk Ha’Shem Yahuwah!

Discussing Hypocritical Western Victimhood Culture’s Positive Reaction to Mockumentary, “No Men Beyond This Point”

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Hypocritical Western Victimhood Culture Reacts Positively to Mockumentary, ‘No Men Beyond This Point’“…

Rayn“No Men Beyond This Point” Trailer:

[fbvideo link=”https://www.facebook.com/Cut/videos/1136980053002030/” width=”” height=”” onlyvideo=”1″]

Hmmm… How about some similarly-themed, and purportedly “wry-humored” films, like “No Women Beyond This Point,” “No Whites Beyond This Point,” “No Jews Beyond This Point,” “No Disabled Beyond This Point,” or “No Blacks Beyond This Point,” etc. Would such mockumentaries ever even be premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival, like this one was? Would audiences respond by thinking, “what a premise!,” as this trailer suggests? Would those who negative react be considered “oh-so-sensitive” and labelled as having “fragile egos,” like this trailer also suggests?

Social Justice Warriors and feminist, alike, who just so happen to be prominent members of victimhood culture, and appear perpetually “triggered” by anything that can even remotely be seen as “offensive,” including comedy and satire, are, of course… eagerly embracing this film, and it’s premise? Hypocritical much? Doublethink much? *facepalm* Ironically, they fail to realize that this mockumentary is actually critical of the concept that female-dominated society will lead to utopia…

Matthew A.: Fragile male egos! Coming from an SJW, that is one of the most formidable acts of projection I have ever witnessed.

A film like this could be quite interesting, but of course this is just going to be progressive nonsense.

Let’s see a world without men and find out whether the women left have any electricity, running water, machine repair, etc….

I agree that there wouldn’t be any war, principally because there wouldn’t be a large enough population to warrant it.

Some people! 😉

Hypocritical Western Victimhood Culture Reacts Positively to Mockumentary, “No Men Beyond This Point”

I originally posted the following video and commentary onto the Facebook wall of an acquaintance, after discovering it being shared from here

 “No Men Beyond This Point” Trailer:
[fbvideo link=”https://www.facebook.com/Cut/videos/1136980053002030/” onlyvideo=”1″]

My Commentary: Hmmm… How about some similarly-themed, and purportedly “wry-humored” films, like “No Women Beyond This Point,” “No Whites Beyond This Point,” “No Jews Beyond This Point,” “No Disabled Beyond This Point,” or “No Blacks Beyond This Point,” etc. Would such mockumentaries ever even be premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival, like this one was? Would audiences respond by thinking, “what a premise!,” as this trailer suggests? Would those who negative react be considered “oh-so-sensitive” and labelled as having “fragile egos,” like this trailer also suggests?

Social Justice Warriors and feminist, alike, who just so happen to be prominent members of victimhood culture, and appear perpetually “triggered” by anything that can even remotely be seen as “offensive,” including comedy and satire, are, of course… eagerly embracing this film, and it’s premise? Hypocritical much? Doublethink much? *facepalm* Ironically, they fail to realize that this mockumentary is actually critical of the concept that female-dominated society will lead to utopia…

Connecting the Dots…

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

2016-04-22-connecting-the-dots

Dementia and Ineffective Flu Jab Are Blamed for Record Spike in Deaths for 50 Years:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3527860/Dementia-ineffective-flu-jab-blamed-record-spike-deaths-50-years.html

(Kate Pickles, MailOnline) Growing cases of dementia and an ineffective flu vaccine were behind the biggest annual rise in deaths in England and Wales for more than 50 years, it has been revealed.

Last year there were over 28,000 more deaths than in 2014 – a rise of 5.6 per cent.

Today, investigations into the largest spike in a single year since 2003, have found respiratory diseases – including flu – and diseases like Alzheimer’s were responsible.

It is the first time the Office for National Statistics (ONS), with help from Public Health England (PHE), has carried out analysis of death figures.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Only half of this story is actually news…

Flu Jab Given to Millions is ‘Useless’ (Feb. 2015):
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/11393560/Flu-jab-given-to-millions-is-useless.html

Now, let’s play connect the dots…

Immunogenicity of a Monovalent, Aluminum-Adjuvanted Influenza Whole Virus Vaccine for Pandemic Use (April 2004):
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168170204001285?np=y

Elevated Brain Aluminium and Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease in an Individual Occupationally Exposed to Aluminium (Feb. 2014):
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/272573.php

Aluminum and Alzheimer’s Disease: After a Century of Controversy, is there a Plausible Link? (Nov. 2010):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21157018

Sorry, Chalabi, But Grammar is Important!

The following correspondence originally took place here, upon the Facebook wall of political activist, Paul Joseph Watson

(replies from all third parties have been omitted for clarity)

The Guardian’s Mona Chalabi

The Guardian’s Mona Chalabi

Paul Joseph Watson: The Guardian’s Mona Chalabi says that correcting bad grammar is offensive and racist because white people are more likely to be concerned about good grammar.

The Guardian: Correcting People’s Bad Grammar is Racist:
http://www.infowars.com/the-guardian-correcting-peoples-bad-grammar-is-racist/

Rayn:

"Grammar is important! Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your Uncle jack off a horse."

“Grammar is important! Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your Uncle jack off a horse.”