As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Liberty Minds,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…
“Bush crashed the economy by spending so much on war!
(Average annuel defense budget $600 billion)
Obama saved the economy and reversed the harm!
(Average annuel defense budget $700 billion)”
My Commentary: Got consistency?
I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…
Academic Study: Having a Loving Family is Unfair:
https://stream.org/academic-study-having-a-loving-family-unfair/
(Amelia Hamilton) It seems obvious that parents should love their children, and that a loving family is something for which we should all strive. I’m not so naive as to suppose that this is always the case, but it should certainly be the goal of our society. Unfortunately, there are those who don’t feel that way. Recently, a piece in ABC Australia posed the question, “Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?” Seriously.
The piece sets out their basic argument: ”The power of the family to tilt equality hasn’t gone unnoticed, and academics and public commentators have been blowing the whistle for some time. Now, philosophers Adam Swift and Harry Brighouse have felt compelled to conduct a cool reassessment.”
My Commentary: Cultural Marxism: when equality in slavery is more desirable than equality in freedom…
From the article: “One way philosophers might think about solving the social justice problem,” they explain, “would be by simply abolishing the family. If the family is this source of unfairness in society then it looks plausible to think that if we abolished the family there would be a more level playing field.”
“‘The evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t — the difference in their life chances — is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,’” they wrote.
“I don’t think parents reading their children bedtime stories should constantly have in their minds the way that they are unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children, but I think they should have that thought occasionally,’ quips Swift.”
Sickening, pseudo-intellectual drivel…
I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…
Perpetual war monger and 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidate, Hillary Clinton
Clinton: US Should Use ‘Military Response’ to Fight Cyberattacks from Russia and China:
http://thinkaboutnow.com/2016/09/clinton-us-should-use-military-response-to-fight-cyberattacks-from-russia-and-china/
Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Party presidential nominee and former US secretary of state, has said that if she becomes president cyberattacks against US interests will be treated “like any other attack” – and that includes military action.
The candidate, who has been investigated by the FBI over use of a private email server to store classified material, was speaking on the campaign trial at the American Legion National Conference in Cincinnati, Ohio on 31 August.
My Commentary: Lizard…
I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…
2016 Democratic Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, the war monger
Killary’s Speech on “American Exceptionalism” : A Pledge to Further US Global Domination:
https://www.sott.net/article/327307-Killarys-speech-on-American-Exceptionalism-A-pledge-to-further-US-global-domination
(Patrick Martin) Hillary Clinton’s speech to the American Legion convention Wednesday was a full-throated declaration of the right and responsibility of the United States to control the world by military force. Clinton pledged to keep the US the dominant global military power, to uphold the military alliances through which US imperialism controls Europe and the Far East, and to wage war unilaterally if deemed necessary, regardless of world opinion.
Clinton repeatedly singled out Russia and China as potential targets for US military action, although such a conflict would pose the danger of nuclear war. After listing out the various unsubstantiated allegations of Russian hacking and cyberattacks, including against the Democratic National Committee, Clinton declared, “As president, I will make clear that the United States will treat cyberattacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic and military responses.”
My Commentary: Imperialism, war crimes and crimes against humanity are okay so long as you’re team blue.
I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…
Teen victim of legal injustice, Cormega Copening
Teen Boy Will Be Charged As Adult For Having Naked Pics of a Minor: Himself:
http://reason.com/blog/2015/09/02/teen-boy-will-be-charged-as-adult-for-ha
(Robby Soave) A North Carolina 17-year-old caught in a sexting scandal faces charges of sexually exploiting a minor that could land him in jail for up to 10 years, since the law considers him an adult. But one of the minors he supposedly exploited is himself—which raises an obvious question: how can a teen be old enough to face adult felony charges, but not old enough to keep a nude picture of himself on his phone?
Unfortunately, that’s the Kafka-esque nightmare in which Fayetteville-area high schooler Cormega Copening finds himself after exchanging private nude photos with his girlfriend—with whom he is legally allowed to have sex, but not to sext.
My Commentary: Brilliant… *facepalm*
