The following correspondence originally took place upon my Facebook wall, after my friend, and fellow Autistic self-advocate, Jason Ross, shared graphic art from here…
Jason R.:
Rayn: But… Muh Borders! 😥
Rayn:
Rayn:
The following correspondence originally took place upon my Facebook wall, after my friend, and fellow Autistic self-advocate, Jason Ross, shared graphic art from here…
Jason R.:
Rayn: But… Muh Borders! 😥
Rayn:
Rayn:
The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Women Who’ve Chosen Abortion Apparently Have More Right Not to Feel Bad About Their Decision Than Individuals With Down Syndrome Have to Display Happiness About Being Alive“…
Rayn: France Bans Video Showing Happy Down Syndrome Children:
http://aleteia.org/blogs/deacon-greg-kandra/france-bans-video-of-happy-down-syndrome-children/Sick sad world… Some in the world would sooner rewrite reality than to simply accept it… And, of course, the law is on *their* side, like usual.
To think, post-abortion mothers apparently have more right *not* to (possibly) feel bad about a single, personal decision than individuals with Downs Syndrome have to show the happiness they feel in merely existing. Fuck eugenics!
Tammy S.: WTF!!!
The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Watch Actor, Obama, ‘Drink’ Filtered Water from Flint, Michigan“…
Rayn: That was some “sip”! 😉 LOL!
Bradley T.: This is a joke! Good drinking water is water a 6 year old can drink, this country is sad…..
Samantha P.: usually they say under 2, pregnant women, and the elderly because a 2yo isn’t as immune as 6 year old..Obama is a joke anyway!
Paul G.: Fake sip at that
Diana B.: Foolery
Andrea S.: oh, so fake, so fake
Nicole B.: …he’s no fool! LOL!
Andrea S.: he didn’t swallow
Rayn: There’s always a first time for everything! 😀
The following correspondence originally took place upon my Facebook wall, after I shared artwork being shared by the page, “Statism is a Cult“…
Rayn:
Nali M.: That happened in my city. I think it’s bc she kneed him in the crotch. Still should have used the taser instead.
Rayn: The officer attempted to arrest this woman for warrants that were invalid, making him nothing more than a costumed criminal, with a shiny badge, and a gun. He was operating only under color of law, and had no legal right to arrest this woman.
Arizona Cop Punches Woman in Face During Arrest:
She was under no obligation to cooperate in any way with the unlawful orders of these State agents, and appeared perfectly cognizant of this fact. She understood that she was being abducted, through use of assault and battery, with the intent to falsely imprison her, and chose to exercise her right to resist the criminal acts she was being subjected to, and attempted to appeal to reason and evidence, as her defense.
Your Right of Defense Against Unlawful Arrest:
http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/defunlaw.htm
From the article:
“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer’s life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”
“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621. (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)
The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of family, after she shared a Twitter screenshot from here…
Sara:
Lisa M.: seriously
Terrence B.: Because he wasn’t mocking a reporter with a disability..
Sara: Although in retrospect, he denied he was making fun of the reporter after the fact, is it a coincidence that the reporter looks like this (see attached photo) and Trump is doing that mocking gesture with his arm in the video:
Trump Mocks Reporter with Disability:
http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/11/26/donald-trump-mocks-reporter-with-disability-berman-sot-ac.cnn
I wouldn’t give merit to his version of the truth, T. He’s a politician and a pig.
Terrence B.: I understand but the story I seen didn’t come from him but it was to dispell the Comercial of where we seen him making the gestures.. It was pieced together to show a negative when actually it was in response to the area reporter getting caught out that when asked a question about his meeting Trump… But I agree with you.. Don’t like the man but it is what it is now.
Rayn: Hillary Falsely Accuses Trump of Mocking Disabled Reporter:
While it is *technically* true that he wasn’t mocking this reporter’s disability, and that the mainstream media did a lot to help peddle the idea that he did, Trump isn’t totally innocent, either, as he *does* have a habit of mocking people by repeating their words, often in an exaggerated way, while spastically moving his arms, and continuously shaking his head – sometimes even leaving his mouth wide open when doing so. It is no accident that these happen to be classic symptoms of palsy, such as is presented in certain forms of cerebral palsy and in Parkinson’s disease.