The “Science” Behind Vaccinations Relies Upon Medically-Induced Human-Sacrifice of Weakest and Most Vulnerable Members of Society

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “X,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"Blue Cross Blue Shield pays your doctor a $40,000 bonus for fully vaccinating 100 patients under the age of two. If your doctor manages to fully vaccinate 200 patients, that bonus jumps to $80,000. But, here's the catch: Under Blue Cross Blue Shield's rules, pediatricians lose the whole bonus unless at least 63% of patients are fully vaccinated, and that includes the flu vaccine. So, it's not just $400 on your child's head - it could be the whole bonus. To your doctor, your decision to vaccinate your child might be worth $40,000, or much more, depending on the size of his or her practice."

“Blue Cross Blue Shield pays your doctor a $40,000 bonus for fully vaccinating 100 patients under the age of two. If your doctor manages to fully vaccinate 200 patients, that bonus jumps to $80,000.
But, here’s the catch: Under Blue Cross Blue Shield’s rules, pediatricians lose the whole bonus unless at least 63% of patients are fully vaccinated, and that includes the flu vaccine. So, it’s not just $400 on your child’s head – it could be the whole bonus. To your doctor, your decision to vaccinate your child might be worth $40,000, or much more, depending on the size of his or her practice.”

My Commentary: Incentivizing eugenics…

The “science” behind vaccinations relies upon the medically-induced human-sacrifice of the weakest and most vulnerable in society in order to grant “immunity” to its stronger members. It’s basically just legalized soft-EUGENICS – a pseudo-science America has such a fondness for, and pioneered, for over a century*…

Read for yourself how the MMR vaccine “works”…

http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/measles/measles-vaccine-injury-death.aspx

While those with certain known medical issues are often directed by doctors not to take vaccinations for fear of injury, those who haven’t yet been diagnosed, due to the rarity of their illness, or a lack of adequate healthcare to have our identified, are in danger of vaccine injury or death. Plain and simple.

Statism is the ultimate cult of violence, coercion, human sacrifice and death-worship.

(* Hitler got many of his GREATEST eugenicist ideas about isolating, sterilizing and murdering “undesirables” from America!

The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics:
http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html

Eugenics and the Nazis — the California Connection:
http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/Eugenics-and-the-Nazis-the-California-2549771.php

These sorts of concepts were being fine-tuned by intellectual elitist control-freaks at places like Cold Spring Harbor laboratory, then promptly instituted legally in this country for over half a century!

Dark Chapter of American History – U.S. Court Battle Over Forced Sterilization:
http://www.commondreams.org/views/072100-106.htm

Eugenics Laws Restricting Immigration:
http://www.eugenicsarchive.org/html/eugenics/essay9text.html)

Connecting the Dots…

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

2016-04-22-connecting-the-dots

Dementia and Ineffective Flu Jab Are Blamed for Record Spike in Deaths for 50 Years:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3527860/Dementia-ineffective-flu-jab-blamed-record-spike-deaths-50-years.html

(Kate Pickles, MailOnline) Growing cases of dementia and an ineffective flu vaccine were behind the biggest annual rise in deaths in England and Wales for more than 50 years, it has been revealed.

Last year there were over 28,000 more deaths than in 2014 – a rise of 5.6 per cent.

Today, investigations into the largest spike in a single year since 2003, have found respiratory diseases – including flu – and diseases like Alzheimer’s were responsible.

It is the first time the Office for National Statistics (ONS), with help from Public Health England (PHE), has carried out analysis of death figures.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Only half of this story is actually news…

Flu Jab Given to Millions is ‘Useless’ (Feb. 2015):
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/11393560/Flu-jab-given-to-millions-is-useless.html

Now, let’s play connect the dots…

Immunogenicity of a Monovalent, Aluminum-Adjuvanted Influenza Whole Virus Vaccine for Pandemic Use (April 2004):
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168170204001285?np=y

Elevated Brain Aluminium and Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease in an Individual Occupationally Exposed to Aluminium (Feb. 2014):
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/272573.php

Aluminum and Alzheimer’s Disease: After a Century of Controversy, is there a Plausible Link? (Nov. 2010):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21157018

Embrace the “Science” of “Herd Immunity,” or Reject it as Pseudo-Scientific, Human-Sacrificing Soft Eugenics?

The following debate originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “But… Muh Herd Immunity!“…

Merck: Murking the Weak for the “Greater Good” of Humanity

Merck: Murking the Weak for the “Greater Good” of Humanity

Rayn: Merck Has Some Explaining To Do Over Its MMR Vaccine Claims:
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/lawrence-solomon/merck-whistleblowers_b_5881914.html

But… but… muh herd immunity! :_(

*sniffle*

Stacie T.http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/cdcwhistleblower.asp

Stacie T.: I’ll take my chances. Death of children from these diseases had hit too close to home for me.

Rayn: Actually, there are three court cases mentioned in the article, and they were placed in order of occurrence and importance, for a reason, with the third one you choose to focus upon being the least relevant, the least substantiated, the least current, and the most controversial. It was likely reported only in the interest of noting the fact that Merck is being accused on many fronts. I was really only interested in sharing the latest “news” (the latest case, that is) but didn’t feel like navigating through the mainstream media monopoly’s efforts to trivialize it, as expected, since I’m using my phone to read and post, instead of my laptop, like I’ve done so often in past. Since I’m currently traveling, I’m not exactly in an ideal position to do the full-time-job’s worth of mental leg-work that so many others else avoid, like I usual do, and had hoped others would be able to do the filtering for themselves, occasionally. I stand corrected…

From the article, “The first court case, United States v. Merck & Co., stems from claims by two former Merck scientists that Merck ‘fraudulently misled the government and omitted, concealed, and adulterated material information regarding the efficacy of its mumps vaccine in violation of the FCA [False Claims Act].’

According to the whistleblowers’ court documents, Merck’s misconduct was far-ranging: It ‘failed to disclose that its mumps vaccine was not as effective as Merck represented, (ii) used improper testing techniques, (iii) manipulated testing methodology, (iv) abandoned undesirable test results, (v) falsified test data, (vi) failed to adequately investigate and report the diminished efficacy of its mumps vaccine, (vii) falsely verified that each manufacturing lot of mumps vaccine would be as effective as identified in the labeling, (viii) falsely certified the accuracy of applications filed with the FDA, (ix) falsely certified compliance with the terms of the CDC purchase contract, (x) engaged in the fraud and concealment describe herein for the purpose of illegally monopolizing the U.S. market for mumps vaccine, (xi) mislabeled, misbranded, and falsely certified its mumps vaccine, and (xii) engaged in the other acts described herein to conceal the diminished efficacy of the vaccine the government was purchasing.’

These fraudulent activities, say the whistleblowers, were designed to produce test results that would meet the FDA’s requirement that the mumps vaccine was 95 per cent effective. To the whistleblowers’ delight, the judge dismissed Merck’s objections to the case proceeding, finding the whistleblowers had plausible grounds on all of the claims lodged against Merck.

If the whistleblowers win, it would represent more than a moral victory (they repeatedly tried to stop Merck while still in its employ). Under the False Claims Act, the whistleblowers would receive a share — likely 25 per cent to 30 per cent — of the amount the government recovers. Previous settlements involving extensive fraud by pharmaceutical companies under the False Claims Act have run into the hundreds of millions of dollars, and in some cases such as against GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer, into the billions.

The second court case, Chatom Primary Care v. Merck & Co. relies on the same whistleblower evidence. This class action suit claims damages because Merck had fraudulently monopolized the mumps market. Doctors and medical practices in the suit would be able to obtain compensation for having been sold an overpriced monopolized product, and a defective one to boot, in that the mumps vaccine wasn’t effective (indeed, the suit alleged that Merck expected outbreaks to occur and, as predicted, they did — mumps epidemics occurred in 2006 in a highly vaccinated population and again in 2009-2010).

‘Plaintiffs have argued sufficient facts to sustain a claim for proximate causation, detailing the significant barriers that other companies would face to enter the mumps vaccine market,’ the court ruled.”

Stacie T.: There were other articles I found, but I am on my phone, as well. I posted one to show the ease at which you can find information to contradict the statements in this article. There is always a chance that a batch of medication produced will be faulty. There’s a chance that any product can have a faulty batch. I am not willing to write off all protection for my child based on speculation. There is so much propoganda against vaccines. I go with the research from a trusted toxicologist whom I know personally and her trusted partners. After seeing a close friend’s life ruined by her two year old’s death, I’d rather do what I can and hope for the best. Could it still happen? Yes. No immunity, including natural immunity, is 100%. (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)

But… Muh Herd Immunity!

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Merck: Murking the Weak for the “Greater Good” of Humanity

Merck: Murking the Weak for the “Greater Good” of Humanity

Merck Has Some Explaining To Do Over Its MMR Vaccine Claims:
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/lawrence-solomon/merck-whistleblowers_b_5881914.html

(Huffington PostMerck, the pharmaceutical giant, is facing a slew of controversies over its Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine following numerous allegations of wrongdoing from different parties in the medical field, including two former Merck scientists-turned-whistleblowers. A third whistleblower, this one a scientist at the Centers for Disease Control, also promises to bring Merck grief following his confession of misconduct involving the same MMR vaccine.

The controversies will find Merck defending itself and its vaccine in at least two federal court cases after a U.S. District judge earlier this month threw out Merck’s attempts at dismissal. Merck now faces federal charges of fraud from the whistleblowers, a vaccine competitor and doctors in New Jersey and New York. Merck could also need to defend itself in Congress: The staff of representative Bill Posey (R-Fla) — a longstanding critic of the CDC interested in an alleged link between vaccines and autism — is now reviewing some 1,000 documents that the CDC whistleblower turned over to them.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: But… but… muh herd immunity! :_(

*sniffle*