Democracy Violates Consent

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “An Anarchist Conversation,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

“If John told you that you had to obey him or he would violate you, that would be wrong. Even if John claims that because he and his friends are in the majority, you must obey or be punished, that would still be wrong. Even Iif John and his friendsvie to have an institution work on their behalf and that you must obey its dictates or be punished, that would still be wrong. If you understand this basic concept then you understand that government neither has the legitimate or lawful right to violate you just because some people decided to vote for it.”

My Commentary: Your public education camp instructor might have taught you otherwise, but this is not how consent actually works.

The Spontaneously-Ordered Nature of True Life

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Positive Anarchy,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

“Has anarchy ever been tried? This all too common question contains a logical fallacy. Anarchy cannot be ‘tried.’ Anarchy is not a social or political system. Anarchy is the fundamental state of nature into which you were born. Anarchy exists every single time you voluntarily interact with other people. Anarchy factually informs the vast majority of your daily activities, even in today’s mad world.” – Roberty Eschauzier (Positive Anarchy)

My Commentary: The various institutionalized reprogramming campaigns working towards transforming human beings into human batteries are so pervasive, the average individual is clueless about the nature of their own consciousness. And, even fewer embrace the Spontaneous Order inherent to truly “living.” Mention Self-OwnershipFreedom Through Non-Aggression, and present all Consensual Interaction as Voluntaryism In Action, and most will attempt to justify the illegitimacy of centralized institutions of coercion by either disavowing their own freedom, attacking everyone else’s, or some combination of the two Yet, the truth is that FREEDOM IS NOT SLAVERY; COERCION IS! No one has the right to control innocent, peaceful individuals

“No matter how they spin it, freedom is not extreme; control is.” Ⓐ

“Suspicion is the companion of mean souls, and the bane of all good society.” – Thomas Paine

A few examples of spontaneous order…

Billionaire Uses His $25 Million Yacht to Deliver Supplies To Stranded Malibu Wildfire Victims – After His Own Winery Was Destroyed By The Flames – When State Refuses His Ship Entry to Port, SURFERS Team Up to Deliver His Supplies to Shore:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6389141/Billionaire-25million-yacht-teams-surfers-deliver-supplies-Malibu-wildfire-victims.html

After Man Collapses, 20 People Take Turns Performing CPR For 96 Minutes:
https://truththeory.com/2018/02/27/man-collapses-20-people-take-turns-performing-cpr-96-minutes/

At Least 80 People Form Human Chain to Rescue Stranded Group in Gulf of Mexico:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/11/80-people-form-human-chain-rescue-gulf-of-mexico-florida

Accident-Free Zone: The German Town Which Scrapped All Traffic Lights and Road Signs:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1028740/Accident-free-zone-The-German-town-scrapped-traffic-lights-road-signs.html

Rejecting Arranged Marriage to Controlling, Abusive, Violent State

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following quote, being shared by an acquaintance, and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

“Anarchists relationship with the state is akin to an arranged marriage. We didn’t want any part of it, yet here we are. Even worse, our spouse is the fat, Neanderthalic, useless, abusive dirtbag who chases brown kids off the lawn with a broom. Unfortunately we can’t run because they can find us anywhere, can access our bank account and have superior firepower.

This is why we cheat every chance we get with that sexy mistress known as freedom. Any creative way to circumvent the rules of this relationship are as euphoric as the blossoming of a new love affair after years of misery, and we will continue to do so until we eventually find a way to get rid of it once and for all.

Statists are the ones with Stockholm syndrome that embrace this relationship. Just like many victims, they don’t want to listen to our advice because they’re comfortable and complacent. These are the friends we generally avoid because we dislike their spouse.

Libertarianism is simply the spouse loving you back but still not allowing you to leave the house unsupervised.

That’s why it’s said ‘Anarchy is for lovers’.  ”

~Elizabeth Rae

My CommentaryAnarchy is for Lovers Consensual Interaction is the currency of co-existence! Peace Love and Anarchy!

A Vulgar Superstition

As I scrolled through my Facebook memories, I discovered the following artwork, which I originally shared to my wall in February of 2016, in my post, “The Majority Cannot Give Consent for the Minority,” and decidedly re-shared it, along with a new commentary…

My Original Commentary:

“Democracy is based on the idea that the
majority can give consent for the minority.
But consent doesn’t work like that.”

“Yo, Dawg! We heard that you don’t like the tyranny of the majority over minority groups…
So, we legitimized the authority of an ultra-minority through a voting majority, so they can tyrannically rule over everybody, accordingly, while you formally select the next elect minority of tyranny to fully control your humanity, in perpetuity!”
(Artwork by Rayn, and originally located here)

My New Commentary: A vulgar superstition.

(note: though I previously shared a different picture of this quote in February of 2016, within my post, “The Majority Cannot Give Consent for the Minority,” I still felt compelled to offer up an alternative commentary when I saw it again, due to the inspiring nature of these words)

State Eagerly Exploits Isolated Consent Case to Enact Collective Coercion Upon Entire Community

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Bans on Bondage and Spanking During Sex Could Be OK, Says Federal Court:
http://reason.com/blog/2016/03/07/bdsm-sex-ban-is-constitutional

() Uh-oh, kinksters: sex cops could be coming for you next. According to a new federal court decision, Americans have no constitutional right to engage in consensual BDSM because “sexual activity that involves binding and gagging or the use of physical force such as spanking or choking poses certain inherent risks to personal safety.” Thus officials could constitutionally ban or regulate such activity in the interest of “the protection of vulnerable persons,” the court held.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: FLASHBACK 2016: Last year, due to a single case of alleged abuse, the creepy control-freaking legislators in State of Virginia handed themselves the right to restrict the private consensual sexual activity of all residents… for their own safety, of course! Ironically, they eagerly exploited an isolated issue of consent in order to enact collective coercion upon the entire community.

According to the ruling, “a legislative restriction on BDSM activity is justifiable by reference to the state’s interest in the protection of vulnerable persons, i.e. sexual partners placed in situations with an elevated risk of physical harm.
[…]
“Sexual activity that involves binding and gagging or the use of physical force such as spanking or choking poses certain inherent risks to personal safety not present in more traditional types of sexual activity. Thus, as inCruzan and Glucksberg, a legislative restriction on BDSM activity is justifiable by reference to the state’s interest in the protection of vulnerable persons, i.e. sexual partners placed in situations with an elevated risk of physical harm.”