U.S. Military Taught Officers: Use ‘Hiroshima’ Tactics for ‘Total War’ on Islam

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

"Important Perspectives to Consider When Viewing this Model: (1) Some actions offered for consideration here will be seen as not 'politically correct' in the eyes of many, both inside and outside of the United States (i.e. Decision Points considered in PH III where Saudia Arabia threatened with starvation, Mecca and Medina destroyed, Islam reduced to cult status). (2) This model presumes Geneva Convention IV 1949 standards of armed conflict and the pursuant UN endorsement of it are now, due to the current common practices of Islamic terrorists, no longer relevant or respected globally. This would leave open the option once against of taking war to a civilian population whenever necessary (this historical precedents of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki being applicable to the Mecca and Medina destruction DP in Phase III). (3) This model presumes we have already failed at Phase I - 'Deterrence' therefore Phase I is not shown as part of this OP Design framework. (4) This odel restates previous internationally accepted Geneva Conventions for protections afforded to combatants captured in uniform and reiterates removal of protections for those who are caught fighting/operating out of uniform (sovs, terrorists, criminals). (5) Against 'non-state actors' do the Geneva conventions of 1949 now need redefinition / clarification?"

“Important Perspectives to Consider When Viewing this Model: (1) Some actions offered for consideration here will be seen as not ‘politically correct’ in the eyes of many, both inside and outside of the United States (i.e. Decision Points considered in PH III where Saudia Arabia threatened with starvation, Mecca and Medina destroyed, Islam reduced to cult status). (2) This model presumes Geneva Convention IV 1949 standards of armed conflict and the pursuant UN endorsement of it are now, due to the current common practices of Islamic terrorists, no longer relevant or respected globally. This would leave open the option once against of taking war to a civilian population whenever necessary (this historical precedents of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki being applicable to the Mecca and Medina destruction DP in Phase III). (3) This model presumes we have already failed at Phase I – ‘Deterrence’ therefore Phase I is not shown as part of this OP Design framework. (4) This odel restates previous internationally accepted Geneva Conventions for protections afforded to combatants captured in uniform and reiterates removal of protections for those who are caught fighting/operating out of uniform (sovs, terrorists, criminals). (5) Against ‘non-state actors’ do the Geneva conventions of 1949 now need redefinition / clarification?”

U.S. Military Taught Officers: Use ‘Hiroshima’ Tactics for ‘Total War’ on Islam:
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/05/total-war-islam

(Noah Shachtman and Spencer AckermanWired.com) The U.S. military taught its future leaders that a “total war” against the world’s 1.4 billion Muslims would be necessary to protect America from Islamic terrorists, according to documents obtained by Danger Room. Among the options considered for that conflict: using the lessons of “Hiroshima” to wipe out whole cities at once, targeting the “civilian population wherever necessary.”

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: In pure WAR CRIMINAL fashion, the US military taught officers that America’s Nuclear Holocaust against Japan is a worthy example of how best to deal with Islamic nations, because the “current common practices of Islamic terrorists” apparently “leave open the option once again of taking war to civilian population wherever necessary.”

Wake Up and Smell the Death-Worship!

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “End U.S. Wars and Occupations,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"If you vote for either man, you vote for more WAR."

“If you vote for either man, you vote for more WAR.”

My Commentary: Wake up, and smell the Death-Worship!

More American War Crimes, Exposed!

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

American Military Torture Victim, Abu Zubaydah

American Military Torture Victim, Abu Zubaydah

Destroyed Videos Showed US Torture Victim ‘Vomiting and Screaming’:
http://news.antiwar.com/2012/05/09/destroyed-videos-showed-us-torture-victim-vomiting-and-screaming/

(Jason Ditz, Antiwar.com) New information on the torture of detainees in custody at CIA “black sites” has come to light, revealing that the videotaped torture of Abu Zubaydah, tapes destroyed in 2005 by the CIA, showed Zubaydah “vomiting and screaming” after being stripped naked and waterboarded.
CIA legal counsel John Rizzo termed the videos “very disturbing” but insisted that all of the torture was “legal” at the time and that the videos were “extraordinarily hard to watch.”

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: As usual, in America, it’s more important to protect war criminals than to protect BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS… And, the torture victim mentioned has never even been formally charged with a crime, either…

Bush and Obama Are Both Guilty of Murdering Children

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Liberty Evolution,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"Bombs children: War Criminal. Bombs children: Nobe Peace Prize."

“Bombs children: War Criminal. Bombs children: Nobe Peace Prize.”

My Commentary: The technical term for this sort of inconsistency is “HYPOCRISY.” Bush and Obama are two murderous war pigs. The blood of dead children is on their hands, just as it is on the hands anyone who voted for these two jackals.

American Government Desires More Wars of Aggression

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

"Support the Military-Industrial-Complex" Bomb Iran! war (BombIran.org)

“Support the Military-Industrial-Complex” Bomb Iran! war (BombIran.org)

An Attack on Iran Would Be Illegal. What Does the Media Say?:
http://www.newsunspun.org/article/an-attack-on-iran-would-be-illegal-what-does-the-media-say

The ‘option’ of a military attack on Iran by Israel, the UK and the US has been increasingly discussed in the UK media since 2011.

Government threats of military action have come in various forms, with Israel warning of potential air strikes against Iran in the next few months, and Obama and Cameron stating that ‘no options are off the table’.

This is combined with what could at best be described as ambiguous reporting on Iran’s nuclear programme, at times baselessly claiming that Iran has nuclear weapons, and, at others, relying on repetition of snippets like ‘the US and its allies believe Iran is trying to develop nuclear weapons – a charge Iran denies.’

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: While y’all were busy drinking the mainstream media kool-aid, your last few presidents were committing war crimes [and crimes against peace].