Second Discussion on the Fact that American Presidents Negotiate With Tyranny, as a Matter of Bipartisan Policy

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Negotiating With Tyranny… The American Way!“…

(first discussion took place here)

Rayn: Negotiating With Tyranny…
The American Way!

Claudia C.: he is a funny guy this tyrant! they love him! Look at the most laughing ones, Obama and Clinton!

Rayn: Five out of five US presidents agree!

Keith M.: Ronald Reagan has that who are you? who am I look.

Jonas A.: LOL!!! talk about aiding and abetting the “enemy”

 

Stephen K.: He looks the same in every picture! Doesn’t he age?

Yet Another Round of American Fascism, Exposed!

The following correspondence originally took place here, upon the Facebook page, “Stateless Sweets“…

(replies from all third parties have been omitted for clarity)

Stateless Sweets: Senate Passes Bill Making Harassment of Police Officer a Crime:
http://www.nysenate.gov/press-release/senate-passes-bill-making-harassment-police-officer-crime

(update: archived copy of above link located here: http://web.archive.org/web/20130608230026/http://www.nysenate.gov/press-release/senate-passes-bill-creating-crime-aggravated-harassment-police-officer)

“Senate Passes Bill That Would Make it a Felony to ‘Annoy’ a Police Officer”

Rayn: More American Fascism, Exposed!

Discussion on Medically Tyranny Behind Gender Reassignment of Intersex Infants

The following correspondence originally took place upon onto my Facebook wall…

Female (XX, or XXX), Male (XY), and Intersex (XXY)

Female (XX, or XXX), Male (XY), and Intersex (XXY)

Rayn: Check it out, Karl! Just now, while scrolling my timeline, I noticed a FB friend of mine sharing this article, and Rosalind Franklin is the very first researcher mentioned – just like we were talking about the other day! Synchronicity! 🙂

6 Women Scientists Who Were Snubbed Due to Sexism:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/13/130519-women-scientists-overlooked-dna-history-science/

Siobhán L.: Nice article!

Siobhán L.: Also – as you might know – Nettie Stevens has probably played a large role in my own life, in which if they never figured out chromosomal sex – I might be in a very different situation, (I am XXY)

Rayn: Wow! More synchronicity! I was literally JUST talking about the topic of intersex with my husband only a little while after making this post. The reason why is because I had also talked about it with a friend yesterday afternoon, during an interview that she asked to conduct on me regarding the topic of “Diversity and Oppression” for a master’s level course she is currently taking at Rutger’s. At that time, before the interview started, while we we warming up with a discussion on unrealized forms of bias and discrimination, I eventually brought up intersex individuals, and, at one point, even mentioned how this group makes up at least 1% of the population – a figure she found to be surprising. So, right after making the post above, I remembered that portion of my pre-interview discussion, and finally decided to look up the figures again, to know for sure. After I was done, I showed my husband, who was also present during my interview, and then, I once again began railing against the common and accepted practice of surgical intervention shortly after birth for those individuals who express any significant form of having both male and genitalia (just as I had done the first time I looked into intersex about a year ago). I cannot help but see it as nothing more than an arrogant and misguided attempt to “medically” force the false dichotomy of a two-gender society.

Siobhán L.: Agreed – speaking about specifically XXY individuals – about 1/3rd of us are fine with being ID’d as male, about 1/3rd as female (I fall into this group) – but about 1/3rd ID as both, a 3rd gender, or genderqueer. I think this is fairly standard across other types of IS too – but I don’t know as much about them from experience.

Siobhán L.: I also fall into a weird other category of being an XXY individual who’s mother took a synthetic estrogen while pregnant with me – causing more teratogenic effects of having only partially formed male parts, and partially formed female parts (I think it’s probably about 80% male, 20% female – roughly)

Rayn: No doubt, Siobhán. Thank you for your valuable input! I really appreciate it! 🙂

Discussing Silence in the Face of Tyranny As the Answer of a Slave

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Silence in the Face of Tyranny is the Answer of a Slave“…

Rayn: Silence? “That is a slave’s answer!

“If You’re Afraid to Speak Out Against Tyranny, You Are ALREADY A SLAVE”

Renat S.: What about stoicism?

Renat S.: (i didn’t say i am a part of it)

Rayn: Being “afraid to speak” isn’t stoicism, as far as I can tell. 🙂

Renat S.: being afraid isn’t always the only reason of silence

RaynAbsolutely. The statement in the above graphic is simply an “if-then” logic clause. It pertains only to situations of silence based on fear. In the reality outside of the exclusionary “if” referenced here, there are many other reasons for not speaking. Some are philosophical, such as the stoicism you previously mentioned, while others are physical, as is the case with deaf mutes. 🙂

Renat S.: indeed

Silence in the Face of Tyranny is the Answer of a Slave

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Freedom From Mental Slavery,” and originally posted it to my own wall…

“If You’re Afraid to Speak Out Against Tyranny, You Are ALREADY A SLAVE”

My Commentary: Silence? “That is a slave’s answer!”