Tag Archives: Cain

Empathy is a Rare Quality, Indeed!

By | |
Leave a comment

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “The Liberty Revolution,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"Empathy (noun): the ability to share someone else's feelings or experiences by imagining what it would be like to be in their situation"

“Empathy (noun): the ability to share someone else’s feelings or experiences by imagining what it would be like to be in their situation”

My Commentary: A lizard I know once matter-of-factly wrote, “I like drones… better than casualties.” What up, doublethink? In his infinite liberal, progressive “wisdom,” he somehow determined the lives of innocent foreign women and children to be less valuable than that of aggression-initiating, war-criminal-controlled, foreign-land-occupating American troops…

Empathy is a rare quality, indeed… Too many are quick to take the side of the Accuser, and expose themselves for the progeny of Cain they really are! For these sorts of morally-bankrupt Individuals, breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the innocent is like engaging in prayer, and listening to their war-criminal-in-chief speak is like attending a sermon!

“[They] are of their father, the Adversary, and the lusts of [their] father (Cain) [they] will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the Truth, because there is no Truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” – Yahuchanan [“Yahu is Gracious’] (John) 8:44

Continue the Oppressive Cycle of Violence, or Embrace the Non-Aggression Principle?

By | |
1 Comment

The following debate originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Violence is the Language of the Oppressor!“…

Rayn: The Non-Aggression Principle is the foundation of True Peace! Violence is the language of the Oppressor, and “the last refuge of the incompetent.” Those who follow after Cain will indeed find themselves among their brethren… in the Pit!

Oh, you believe in violent revolution? Tell me about how your use of violence is different than the State's use of violence?

Oh, you believe in violent revolution? Tell me about how your use of violence is different than the State’s use of violence?

Adam G.: My violence is different from the state’s because I am protecting myself. If you can’t see the difference, then you either have a metric fucktonne of privielge or don’t pay attention.

Rayn: Hmmm… To begin, Adam, if you can’t see the difference between physical self-defense and violent revolution… please let me know, and I will be more than happy to explain! I would never deny another the right to physical self-defense in the event of an immediate threat of violence. That is a personal CHOICE, to be made with respect to each situation, even. 🙂

Second, you have committed three logical fallacies in your conclusion. (1) The False Dichotomy: There are many more reasons than the two you have presented to explain why I would be unable to see difference between “[your] violence” versus the State’s use of it. (2) An Ad Hominem Attack: Claiming me to have either a “metric fucktonne of privilege  or to be “not paying attention” are unsubstantiated personal jabs at me, and do nothing to further an explanation of your position, and really only support your last error, (3) An Appeal to Ridicule: Mocking what you believe is my position does nothing to explain your position. This is true, regardless of what form of mockery you engage in, really.

I will be happy to continue this discussion with you, but you must stay on track. Let’s share ideas. I enjoy it. Also, be sure to let me know if you are referring to physical self-defense, or violent revolution, when you mention “[your] violence,” as I am not sure, since your wording leaves much room to interpret “protecting [your]self” as self-defense, especially since you did not elaborate on your position whatsoever, and presented an Appeal to Ridicule. To me, this means that we might just be dealing with a matter of semantics, here. 🙂

Violence is the Language of the Oppressor!

By | |
1 Comment

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Liberty 3VOLution,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"Oh, you believe in violent revolution? Tell me about how your use of violence is different than the State's use of violence?"

“Oh, you believe in violent revolution? Tell me about how your use of violence is different than the State’s use of violence?”

My Commentary: The Non-Aggression Principle is the foundation of True Peace! Violence is the language of the Oppressor, and “the last refuge of the incompetent.” Those who follow after Cain will indeed find themselves among their brethren… in the Pit!

(*update*: this posting sparked the debate, “Continue the Oppressive Cycle of Violence, or Embrace the Non-Aggression Principle?” Check it out!)