Discussing Continued Push for War with Iran by Cowards-That-Be Running America

The following correspondence originally took place on the Facebook wall of family, upon the post, “Discussion on Cowards-That-Be Continuing to Push for War with Iran“…

“No war in Iran”

Genaire: Well it looks like we will be at war with Iran in the next few days, then of course, Syria.

Jason O.: & why is this?

Rayn: Let’s just hope the globalist control freaks aren’t that stupid…

Genaire: The war with Iraq wasn’t over the world trade or bringing Democracy to the region. Our goal has always been to get a pipeline in that region to the Caspian Sea. So we are presently at war with Iraq, Afghanistan then next in line would be Iran and Syria. We are going to use Iran’s nuclear reactor as the excuse.

Keith M.:  Its not election season yet.

Rayn: Very true about the pipeline, and very possible about the attack on Iran. I predicted the same thing in 2007:

(Artwork by Rayn)

If it does go down, Israel will begin the war with an airstrike Iran, so that America can claim defense of an “ally” when our military becomes involved…

Rayn: According to Wiki: “United States Senate are scheduled to be held on November 2, 2010, for 37 of the 100 seats in the United States Senate.”

That’s about 11 weeks from now…

Keith M.:  Oh.. No.

Genaire: He needs an event now to help with his approval ratings.

Genaire: Israel Has Three Days to Stop Iran Developing Nuclear Weapons, Warns Former U.S. Ambassador:

Anke M.: I don’t know why this is on newsfeed now, it was stupid then and it is stupid still!

Genaire: Anke, It’s actually pretty prophetic. Yes I was off about how long it would take but low and behold I predicted these warmongers would be attacking Syria way back in 2010. Next up of course is Iran. With Russia on the field they more than likely will back down since they only attack countries with no hope of truly defending themselves.

Rayn: Here’s my artwork from June 2007: http://www.infowars.com/images2/cartoons/250607masterrm9.jpg

(Artwork by Rayn)

Anke M.: We and other Nations have a deal with Iran! Thanks President Obama. And you’re welcome Genaire.

Genaire: Yes and I’m glad. That deal is very shaky at this point. The minute the office changes hands I doubt the deal will hold up.

Anke M.: It will stand for many reasons even if God forbid a republican gets elected, which will not happen, at any rate we are just one of several Nations that reached the agreement and even a republican will think twice about unilaterally pulling out of such a significant deal.

Genaire: That agreement as we both know doesn’t have the support of either parties. So if God forbid a socialist I mean a democrat gets in office the agreement will be just as shaky as if a republican was in office. Specially if warmonger Hillary wins the election.

As far as the other nations go. The minute we pull away from the deal they will quickly follow.

Rayn: Repeat after me: “Operation Ajax never took place” 😉 Now, *firmly* place head in sand.

Anke M.: I am truly amazed at the total lack of nuance and reason in your comments. The stupidity is overwhelming. And Rayn’s weird conspiracy theories I can certainly do without!

Genaire: Then gladly unfollow me Anke. Your socialist comments no longer show up on my wall for months now.

Anke M.: I don’t know how…..Ha!

Rayn: That awkward moment when a so-called conspiracy “theory” turns out to be conspiracy FACT:

Genaire: Operation Ajax is not a conspiracy theory. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d’état

Rayn: An oversight, perhaps?

Anke M.: Oh for gods sake, talking about the CIA aided coup that got the Sjah on the throne? Grow up, you guys were not even born yet! Mossadeque was no angel, in global politics sometimes the end justifies the means! I remember it well, and subsequently became friends with queen Farahdibah after the Shah passed away, and her kids went to school with my son. That has nothing to do with this of course, but geopolitics are complicated .

Genaire: We can’t get caught attempting a coup on another nation then expect the relations between us and that nation to not forever be in turmoil. The ends in this case justifies the years and years of continued tensions between our two nations.

Genaire: Don’t really see what’s so complicated about leaving people alone. If they have not physically agressed against us we should not physically agrees against them.

If Saudi Arabia attacks us we should not use that as an excuse to attack Iraq.

Genaire: Are we now acknowledging the fact that it wasn’t a conspiracy theory?

Rayn: So, first it was a “conspiracy theory,” but then, when that falsehood is straight debunked with fact, without missing a beat, you then just outright admit that you’re okay with the CIA overthrowing democratically elected leaders of foreign countries because “Mossadeque was no angel” and “sometimes the end justifies the means”? Time to face the truth: you support war criminals, rather than peace!

Genaire: I’ll simplify it. Innocent people are being killed over these geopolitics. The ends do not justify the means. The means being the United States having control over other sovereign nations oil and dictating how they treat their populace.

Rayn: If that same illegitimate “no angel… end justifies means” argument was used to overthrow the US government, I wonder what war-criminal apologists like you would be saying, then.

Creative Commons License     Fair Use     Public Domain

(All original portions of this work, by Rayn Kleipe, are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, while all redistributed links, images, sounds, videos, and writings are protected under 17 U.S.C. § 107: Fair Use, or under Public Domain)

Tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Before posting, solve math below to prevent spam (and, copy comment to clipboard, just in case): * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.