Tag Archives: statism

In Complete Abuse of Law, North Carolina Teen Charged With Sexually Exploiting Himself for Possessing Nude Photos of Self on His Phone

By | |
1 Comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Teen victim of legal injustice, Cormega Copening

Teen victim of legal injustice, Cormega Copening

Teen Boy Will Be Charged As Adult For Having Naked Pics of a Minor: Himself:
http://reason.com/blog/2015/09/02/teen-boy-will-be-charged-as-adult-for-ha

() A North Carolina 17-year-old caught in a sexting scandal faces charges of sexually exploiting a minor that could land him in jail for up to 10 years, since the law considers him an adult. But one of the minors he supposedly exploited is himself­—which raises an obvious question: how can a teen be old enough to face adult felony charges, but not old enough to keep a nude picture of himself on his phone?

Unfortunately, that’s the Kafka-esque nightmare in which Fayetteville-area high schooler Cormega Copening finds himself after exchanging private nude photos with his girlfriend—with whom he is legally allowed to have sex, but not to sext.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Brilliant… *facepalm*

Discussing Short-Sighted, Arrogant Control-Freak State’s Eager Enforcement of Arbitrary Aesthetic Opinion Over Freedom and Self-Sustainability

By | |
Leave a comment

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Short-Sighted, Arrogant Control-Freak State Eagerly-Enforces Arbitrary Aesthetic Opinion Over Freedom and Self-Sustainability“…

2016-09-04-discussing-short-sighted-arrogant-control-freak-states-eager-enforcement-of-arbitrary-aesthetic-opinion-over-freedom-and-self-sustainability

Rayn: Shallow, short-sighted, arrogant control-freaks eagerly-enforce arbitrary aesthetic opinion over freedom and self-sustainability…

Judge Rules Government Can Ban Vegetable Gardens Because They’re ‘Ugly’:
http://countercurrentnews.com/2016/09/judge-rules-government-can-ban-vegetable-gardens-theyre-ugly/

Monica G.: Must be strictly a meat eater 😡

Unay U.: They want you to continue to buy your produce at supermarkets.

Unay U.: Florida is notorious for stopping people from self reliance.

Short-Sighted, Arrogant Control-Freak State Eagerly-Enforces Arbitrary Aesthetic Opinion Over Freedom and Self-Sustainability

By | |
1 Comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

2016-09-04-short-sighted-arrogant-control-freak-state-eagerly-enforces-arbitrary-aesthetic-opinion-over-freedom-and-self-sustainability

Judge Rules Government Can Ban Vegetable Gardens Because They’re ‘Ugly’:
http://countercurrentnews.com/2016/09/judge-rules-government-can-ban-vegetable-gardens-theyre-ugly/

(Ben Richards) Last week, a Miami-Dade judge became the focus of much-deserved anger when she ruled on an ordinance banning front yard vegetable gardens. The village of Miami Shores, according to the ruling, has every right to take legal action against residents who dare to grow food in their own yards because they are “ugly.”

The ruling was a whopping ten pages long as it was filled with legal analysis and definitions of what constitutes a vegetable. Even though she ruled in favor of the ban, Judge Monica Gordo acknowledged that she wasn’t quite sure how a vegetable garden can ruin the aesthetics of one’s property.

However, she stated that the democratically elected government has every right to dictate what constitutes an ugly front yard, and gardens are apparently a contributing factor.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Shallow, short-sighted, arrogant control-freaks eagerly-enforce arbitrary aesthetic opinion over freedom and self-sustainability…

Never Forget… Institutionalized Eugenics in America

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and statement onto my Facebook wall…

"Buck v. Bell: In 1925, Virginia, like a majority of states then, enacted eugenic sterilization laws. Viriginia's law allowed state institutions to operate on individuals to prevent conception of what were believed to be 'genetically inferior' children. Charlottesville native, Carrie Buck (1906 - 1983), involuntarily committed to a state facility near Lynchburg, was chosen as the first person to be sterilized under the law. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Buck v. Bell, on 2 May 1927, affirmed the Virginia law. After Buck, mor than 8,000 other Virginians were sterlized before the most relevant parts of the act were repealed in 1974. Later evidence eventually showed that Buck and many others had no 'hereditary defects.' She is buried south of here." (Department of Historic Resources, 2002)

“Buck v. Bell: In 1925, Virginia, like a majority of states then, enacted eugenic sterilization laws. Viriginia’s law allowed state institutions to operate on individuals to prevent conception of what were believed to be ‘genetically inferior’ children. Charlottesville native, Carrie Buck (1906 – 1983), involuntarily committed to a state facility near Lynchburg, was chosen as the first person to be sterilized under the law. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Buck v. Bell, on 2 May 1927, affirmed the Virginia law. After Buck, mor than 8,000 other Virginians were sterlized before the most relevant parts of the act were repealed in 1974. Later evidence eventually showed that Buck and many others had no ‘hereditary defects.’ She is buried south of here.” (Department of Historic Resources, 2002)

Buck v. Bell:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_v._Bell

Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, “for the protection and health of the state” did not violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The decision was largely seen as an endorsement of negative eugenics—the attempt to improve the human race by eliminating “defectives” from the gene pool. The Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell.

(Read entire article here…)

Never forget…

State Forces People into Homelessness Over Possession of Small Quantities of Cannabis

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

2016-08-31-state-forces-people-into-homelessness-over-possession-of-small-quantities-of-cannabis

Police Having People Evicted from Homes for Small Amount of Marijuana:
http://sprout.news/evicted-small-amount-marijuana/

() Police in Washington DC are taking advantage of nuisance abatement laws to target renters and homeowners for possession of tiny amounts of cannabis.

Rajuawn Middleton’s son moved out of her home years earlier, but that did not stop police in the nations capital from raiding her home in a search for guns they allege he was harboring. In fact, in the end, the son was never charged with any crime related to the allegations.

During the raid in March 2014, however, a single joint was found in her possession. As a result she was eventually forced to move out of her home.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: And, once these families are disenfranchised, and forced into homelessness by the State, most will require government “assistance” to get by…

“Government: breaks your leg, offers you a crutch, then says, ‘See, if it weren’t for me, you wouldn’t be able to walk’.”