Debating About the FBI’s Review of 650,000 Weiner Laptop Emails

The following debate originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Super-Human FBI Manages to Review 650,000 Weiner Laptop Emails in a Mere 691,200 Seconds!“…

FBI Director James Comey and 2016 Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton

FBI Director James Comey and 2016 Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton

RaynFBI Clears Clinton — Again:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/06/politics/comey-tells-congress-fbi-has-not-changed-conclusions/index.html

As a Twitter post I read earlier today noted: “the FBI had 8 days to review 650,000 emails on Weiner’s laptop. There are 691,200 seconds in 8 days.”

Wow! That’s some astonishing detective work! Great job! 😉

Teddy C.: They had computer programs in place to review the emails, flag the duplicates from the previous investigation, flag the personal conversations, and drill down to the actual new content that needed review. No matter what the context is, this amount of data wouldn’t be processed without some sort of automation in place.

Micah W.: Exactly. Not all 650,000 of those were to or from Hillary. In fact, what I read was that fewer than 1,000 were. The 650,000 line was picked up by a media eager to make this a horse race of an election. More money in it for them that way.

Rayn: On November 3rd, CNN reported that the FBI found “emails related to Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state on [Weiner’s] laptop,” and noted that the emails “are n̲o̲t̲ ̲d̲u̲p̲l̲i̲c̲a̲t̲e̲s̲ of emails found on Secretary Clinton’s private server.”

FBI Finds Emails Related to Clinton’s State Department Tenure:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-finds-emails-related-to-hillary-clintons-state-department-tenure/

_________________________________

Meanwhile, both the first and second FBI investigation of Clinton actually relate to emails sent through Clinton’s private server, and use of unsecured emails to send and receive secured information. This, of course, includes emails sent by members of her staff, such as Weiner’s estranged wife, Huma Abedin. You can see examples of this for yourself within this New York Times article, relating to the last batch of 30,000 Clinton emails released by the FBI. Note the name of the sender within the two featured emails pictured in the article. It is none other than Huma Abedin:

Last Batch of Hillary Clinton’s Emails Is Released:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/01/us/politics/last-batch-of-hillary-clintons-emails-is-released.html

_________________________________

With this in mind, recognize the fact that the New York Time reported that “a senior law enforcement official said that tens of thousands of emails belonging to Ms. Abedin were on Mr. Weiner’s laptop.”

Emails in Anthony Weiner Inquiry Jolt Hillary Clinton’s Campaign:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/29/us/politics/fbi-hillary-clinton-email.html

_________________________________

Now, factor in the reality that during the last Clinton investigation, the FBI took almost an entire year to investigate approximately 30,000+ emails handed over by Clinton:

What We Know About the Investigation Into Hillary Clinton’s Private Email Server:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/05/27/us/politics/what-we-know-about-hillary-clintons-private-email-server.html

_________________________________

Finally, understand that relying solely on computer algorithms to process the 650,000 emails in Weiner’s laptop, instead of using actual investigators, does not qualify as a legitimate investigation practice, considering the fact that pseudonym emails addresses were discovered as being used during the last investigation…

Obama Used a Pseudonym When Emailing Hillary Clinton While She Was at the US State Department:
http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-used-a-pseudonym-while-emailing-hillary-clinton-while-she-was-at-the-us-state-department-2016-9

(By the way, as just a point of interest, the FBI has not actually made any statement about what method they used to sort through the 650,000 emails on Weiner’s laptop. As the article below states, “The FBI declined WIRED’s request for more information about how it performed its week-long search.”

https://www.wired.com/2016/11/yes-donald-trump-fbi-can-vet-650000-emails-eight-days/ ) (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)

Super-Human FBI Manages to Review 650,000 Weiner Laptop Emails in a Mere 691,200 Seconds!

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

FBI Director James Comey and 2016 Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton

FBI Director James Comey and 2016 Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton

FBI Clears Clinton — Again:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/06/politics/comey-tells-congress-fbi-has-not-changed-conclusions/index.html

(Eric Bradner, Pamela BrownEvan Perez) FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers Sunday the agency hasn’t changed its opinion that Hillary Clinton should not face criminal charges after a review of new emails.

“Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July,” Comey wrote in the new letter to congressional committee chairmen.

Comey dropped a bombshell on the presidential race last month when he sent a letter to Congress saying the FBI had discovered emails in a separate investigation that could be connected to the now-closed probe of whether Clinton mishandled classified information. The move infuriated Democrats and emboldened Republican nominee Donald Trump.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: As a Twitter post I read earlier today noted: “the FBI had 8 days to review 650,000 emails on Weiner’s laptop. There are 691,200 seconds in 8 days.”

Wow! That’s some astonishing detective work! Great job! 😉

CNN Analyst Lies About American Police State in Effort to Condemn Brazilian Guards Who Aimed Guns at Olympian Ryan Lochte

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Law enforcement analyst, Art Roderick

Law enforcement analyst, Art Roderick

‘We Don’t Do That Here in the US’: CNN Analyst rips Brazilian Guards for Pulling Guns on Ryan Lochte:
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/we-dont-do-that-here-in-the-us-cnn-analyst-rips-brazilian-guards-for-pulling-guns-on-ryan-lochte/

() Appearing on CNN, a former U.S. Marshals director questioned a Brazilian guard’s actions after getting into a scuffle with four U.S. Olympic swimmers, suggesting that pulling a gun on a suspect or a criminal is not something that happens in the U.S.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Liar.

CNN Removes Reporter Diana Magnay from Israel After She Calls Criminals Who Cheered Gaza Bombing, then Threatened to Destroy Her Property, “Scum” in Tweet

The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of fellow emcee, Tru Leo…

CNN correspondent, Diana Magnay, reporting live from Israel during Gaza invasion

CNN correspondent, Diana Magnay, reporting live from Israel during Gaza invasion

Tru Leo: CNN Removes Reporter Diana Magnay From Israel-Gaza After ‘Scum’ Tweet:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/18/cnn-diana-magnay-israel-gaza_n_5598866.html

Rayn: I give this reporter props. In reality, MOST of humanity does not look kindly upon crowds of cowards cheering at the massacre of innocent civilians. Yet, in this case, such despicable behavior is magically acceptable? Never! And, since when did threatening others with destruction of their property for not speaking how you want them to magically stop being a criminal act? Never! So, why was this reporter penalized by her job for simply publicly posting her feelings about being victimized into censorship by this cheering mob? Would CNN prefer that their reporter sympathize with those who initiate aggression against her, instead? That’s laughable!

The lamestream media is a total joke. They are completely out of their depth when it comes to reporting the Truth, and should just stick to propagating the sorts of toxic Pentagonian lies that lead to illegal wars of aggression (such as: imaginary WMDs in Iraq, and the Kuwaiti incubator hoax).

Tru Leo: I definitely don’t look to mainstream media for truth unless it concerns it’s own agenda. Easy to see where they stand.

RaynBehind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/us/20generals.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Tru Leo: Thanks