Rejecting Arranged Marriage to Controlling, Abusive, Violent State

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following quote, being shared by an acquaintance, and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

“Anarchists relationship with the state is akin to an arranged marriage. We didn’t want any part of it, yet here we are. Even worse, our spouse is the fat, Neanderthalic, useless, abusive dirtbag who chases brown kids off the lawn with a broom. Unfortunately we can’t run because they can find us anywhere, can access our bank account and have superior firepower.

This is why we cheat every chance we get with that sexy mistress known as freedom. Any creative way to circumvent the rules of this relationship are as euphoric as the blossoming of a new love affair after years of misery, and we will continue to do so until we eventually find a way to get rid of it once and for all.

Statists are the ones with Stockholm syndrome that embrace this relationship. Just like many victims, they don’t want to listen to our advice because they’re comfortable and complacent. These are the friends we generally avoid because we dislike their spouse.

Libertarianism is simply the spouse loving you back but still not allowing you to leave the house unsupervised.

That’s why it’s said ‘Anarchy is for lovers’.  ”

~Elizabeth Rae

My CommentaryAnarchy is for Lovers Consensual Interaction is the currency of co-existence! Peace Love and Anarchy!

Statism is Sadism

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following status update here, posted by libertarian anarchist, Robert Higgs, and originally shared it to my own wall, along with commentary…

Robert Higgs: If you wish to live subject to the domination, extortion, and oppression of dishonest, violent gangsters, and I cannot change your mind about the desirability of doing so, I will accept that my powers of persuasion have failed. Still, I wonder why you must force me to live likewise, and by what right you regard yourself as entitled to do so.

My Commentary: “Freedom is not extreme. Control is. ”

#CheckYourStatistPrivilege #ChooseVoluntaryism#ConsentIsTheCurrencyOfCoexistence

Presenting, Your “Representatives”!

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Police and Government Accountability Movement,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

“Millionaires in Congress, versus Millionaires in America
White men in Congress, versus White men in America
Women in Congress, versus women in America
Over 55 in Congress, versus Over 55 in America”

My Commentary: Presenting: your “representatives.”
LOLZ! Don’t forget to vote!

Muh Borders Keep All Muh Freedom Inside!

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork, being shared by an acquaintance from here, and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

“Ryan Van Bipper: So many people are leaving NC for other states, fleeing from danger. I wonder what would happen if, when they got to the border, they were imprisoned or had their kids taken away. Just for safe keeping. I bet there are some bad people mixed in with the good. Maybe we should stop letting these people into neighboring states until we can vet them better. If the government decided to close state borders, do you think the people of NC would be good citizens and obey the law if it meant they and their loved ones would die? Would they break the law and sneak into Virginia? Would that make the illegal human beings? IDK, sometimes I just talk crazy. LOL.”

My Commentary: But, Muh Borders keep all Muh Freedom inside!

Cop-Suckers, Unite!

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Liberty Rockstar,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

“The only time this patriot takes a knee is to suck a hero officer’s dick”

My Commentary: 😀