Manipulative American Foreign Policy: Engaging in War Against Same Exact Terrorists USA Created

The following correspondence originally took place upon my Facebook wall, after I posted artwork being shared by the page, “Young Americans for Liberty“…

Rayn:

“Let me be clear: we are going to war against the same group we funded, armed, and were going to fight alongside last year, while continuing to support them with your tax dollars.”

“Let me be clear: we are going to war against the same group we funded, armed, and were going to fight alongside last year, while continuing to support them with your tax dollars.”

Morgan S.: Assad is fighting ISIS, Russia is Supporting Assad. Question is, if we fight against Assad and Russia. then we are fighting in support of ISIS? or will we be fighting all three?

RaynNow the Truth Emerges: How the US Fueled the Rise of ISIS in Syria and Iraq (June 2015):
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/03/us-isis-syria-iraq

Made in the USA: Report Shows ISIS Using US Arms from ‘Syria Rebels’ (Sept. 2014):
http://news.antiwar.com/2014/09/08/made-in-the-usa-report-shows-isis-using-us-arms-from-syria-rebels/

Morgan S.: Rayn okay you’re on point

Kala Z.: Plus al-nusra and quorosan……

Nicole B.: …and the sad thing is that the fight started 15+ years ago!

America’s Favorite War Criminal

The following debate originally took place upon my Facebook wall, after I posted artwork being shared by the page, “Free Talk Live

Rayn:

"Trying to be cool and relatable... so people will forget about how many children your drones have killed in Pakistan and Yemen."

“Trying to be cool and relatable… so people will forget about how many children your drones have killed in Pakistan and Yemen.”

Robert C.: A man can be cool and relatable and kill children in Pakistan. Binary oppositions of good and evil are largely fantasies His intentions is not to kill children in Pakistan. He is not Hitler. Maybe his enemies when engaging in warfare should not have their families in the mix.

RaynThe man appears cool and relatable only to those who accept him murdering innocent children. Labeling the man’s war crimes as “warfare” and calling innocent children as “enemies” perfectly illustrates George Orwell‘s point that “political language… is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable.”

Obama certainly isn’t Hitler… but, Hitler is not my litmus test for whether or not evil is taking place.

Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, was a US citizen and an innocent child. Specifically, he was born in Denver, Colorado, and lived in American until he was 7 years old. He was murdered by a US drone strike while peacefully eating dinner at a restaurant in Yemen with his teenage cousin, who was also killed in the attack, along with at least five other civilians…

al-Awlaki was not even with his father the day he was murdered because he was still in the process of searching for him and he had not seen him in years. Sadly for him, it was during this very quest that he soon unwittingly entered a lawless, war *criminal* zone, where the CIA had been regularly terrorizing civilians for years in the name of “fighting terror.”

Such flimsy excuses for al-Awlaki’s murder are nothing new, though….

Former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs on US Drone Murder of 16-Year-Old al-Awlaki:
[youtube_sc url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pOUFHTN1G4″]

“I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father if they’re truly concerned about the well-being of their children.” – Former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs

Genaire: Question: Can the same be said about Truman’s nuclear bombing of two civilians cities in Japan? Did the punishment fit the crime? Considering the fact they bombed military targets our retaliation of bombing civilian cities in my rational opinion doesn’t fit the crime.

We are fighting “terror”. Terror is not organized into strategically placed military facilities. These “terror” groups reside amongst innocent people special considerations must be made to stop the killing of these innocent people. Even greater effort must be made when considering we armed, trained and radicalized most of them through our imperialist foreign policies.

I equate it to Canada trying to kill the K.K.K. which is also a terrorist group. How can they kill a K.K.K. chapter without killing the innocent people surrounding these chapters? Does the killing of our innocent civilians justify the bombing of this terrorist group? When their are no clear cut lines of battle as is the case when fighting “terror” the whole world becomes an open target.

Statist Doublethink About Treatment of Innocent Muslim-American Children

The following debate originally took place upon my Facebook wall, after I posted artwork being shared by the page, “The Anarchists of Pakistan“…

Rayn:

"Cool clock! Hey, you look just like the Muslim American teen I killed with a drone"

“Cool clock! Hey, you look just like the Muslim American teen I killed with a drone”

Anke M.: That kid was in a war zone his father , who preached aggression against America and incited terrorist attacks around the globe should have known better than to let the kid visit a war zone.
I believe the other kid was a productive, brilliant student at an American Highschool in an American State. Don’t confuse the two and muddy up the proper state of affairs!

Rayn: Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, was a US citizen and an innocent child, just like Ahmed Mohamed is. Specifically, he was born in Denver, Colorado, and lived in American until he was 7 years old.

However, unlike Mohamed, al-Awlaki was murdered by a US drone strike while peacefully eating dinner at a restaurant in Yemen with his teenage cousin, who was also killed in the attack, along with at least five other civilians…

Besides this, al-Awlaki was not even with his father that day because he was still in the process of searching for him and he had not seen him in years. Sadly for him, it was during this very quest that he soon unwittingly entered a lawless, war *criminal* zone, where the CIA had been regularly terrorizing civilians for years in the name of “fighting terror.”

Such flimsy excuses for al-Awlaki’s murder are nothing new, though….

Robert Gibbs Blames Al Awlaki 16 Year Old Son’s Death By Drone On His Having A Terrorist Father:
[youtube_sc url=”_pOUFHTN1G4″]

“I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father if they’re truly concerned about the well-being of their children.” – Former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs

I’m not at all confused, and my view on the matter is crystal-clear. Ahmed Mohamed deserves to live in peace, and so did Abdulrahman al-Awlaki. Obama is the actor who’s muddying this issue with his political doubletalk. He’s the professional liar extending a politically-convenient, popular-opinion-pleasing olive branch to Mohamed, while his administration continues to justify covertly dropping bombs on al-Awlaki, and other innocents like him.

The proper state of affairs will not be reached until all of the lies, the violence, the murders, and war crimes of the State are exposed.

‘Political language… is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable.” – George Orwell

GenaireI equate it to Canada trying to kill the K.K.K. which is also a terrorist group. How can they kill a K.K.K. chapter without killing the innocent people surrounding these chapters? Does the killing of our innocent civilians justify the bombing of this terrorist group? When their are no clear cut lines of battle as is the case when fighting “terror” the whole world becomes an open target.

Outsider Artists

The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of my friend, Brooke N…

Brooke N.Turning the Art World Inside Out – Part 1 of 5:

[youtube_sc url=”WhxTDC2rZtc”]

Minnie, I know you probably can’t see this on the computer. Remind me and we’ll watch it. Rayn, you might want to start watching with the Japanese artists at 8:58 min. or so to save your battery. Gregg, I like the part in Venice about halfway through where the art critics talk about contemporary art being contrived, not spontaneous, not urgent. I think you’re able to use your training in service to being spontaneous and urgent. Worth 14 minutes of my life

Rayn: Very interesting. Thanx for sharing. 🙂

The Main Logical Fallacy Behind Socialism

The following correspondence originally took place here, upon the Facebook page, “Young Americans for Liberty

(replies from all third parties have been omitted for clarity)

Young Americans for Liberty:

“Every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all.” – Frederic Bastiat

RaynA non-sequitur logical fallacy, to be sure.