Horrific Cartoon Animation of an Abortion at 20 Weeks of Pregnancy

The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of family…

Genaire: Abortion at 20 Weeks of Pregnancy:
[fbvideo link=”https://www.facebook.com/DeTemplario/videos/1692478104301394/” onlyvideo=”1″]

Rayn

"Suction and Curettage Abortion of a 9 Week Old Fetus: (A) A speculum is placed in the vagina, a tenaculum is clamped to the lip of the cervix and a cannula is inserted into the uterus. (B) The amniotic fluid, placenta and fetus are suctioned through the cannula into a collection jar. The fetus and placenta are torn apart in the process. (C) The uterine cavity is scraped with a curette to determine whether any significant amout of tissue remains. (D) The contents of the collection jar are examined to assure that all fetal parts and an adequate amount of tissue commensurate with estimated gestational age are present."

“Suction and Curettage Abortion of a 9 Week Old Fetus: (A) A speculum is placed in the vagina, a tenaculum is clamped to the lip of the cervix and a cannula is inserted into the uterus. (B) The amniotic fluid, placenta and fetus are suctioned through the cannula into a collection jar. The fetus and placenta are torn apart in the process. (C) The uterine cavity is scraped with a curette to determine whether any significant amout of tissue remains. (D) The contents of the collection jar are examined to assure that all fetal parts and an adequate amount of tissue commensurate with estimated gestational age are present.”

Rats Prefer Freeing Each Other to Food, Much Unlike a Great Deal of Humanity

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork, being shared by an acquaintance from here, and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

My Commentary: If only human beings had the same preference… Alas, we’re far too busy intellectualizing the existence of the cage… (But… but… Muh Roads! Muh Borders! Muh Troops! Muh Flag! Muh Drug War! Muh War on Terrorism! Muh Police! Muh Courts! Muh Social Programs! Muh Democracy! Muh Elections! Muh Representatives! Muh Safety! Muh Security! Muh Social Contract! Muh Government!!!!! Muh “Necessary Evil”!!!!! NO!!!!!)

Discussing How Control-Freaks Petitioned Government to Steal Deceased Child’s Gravestone

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Control-Freaks Petition Government to Steal Deceased Child’s Gravestone“…

Because Max Corbett-Gardener’s headstone was considered ‘not in keeping” with Great Malvern Cemetery, it was removed

Because Max Corbett-Gardener’s headstone was considered ‘not in keeping” with Great Malvern Cemetery, it was removed

Rayn: No right is sacred when it comes to control-freaks, and the governments they use to abuse the peaceful… Complaining about, and petitioning the government steal, a deceased child’s gravestone is a new low, UK! And, that the State actually did it is even more despicable!

4-Year-Old’s Headstone Removed Because One Person was Offended By It:
http://tribunist.com/news/4-year-olds-headstone-removed-because-one-person-was-offended-by-it/

Sandra C.: What the HELL is wrong with people?

Control-Freaks Petition Government to Steal Deceased Child’s Gravestone

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Because Max Corbett-Gardener's headstone was considered 'not in keeping" with Great Malvern Cemetery, it was removed

Because Max Corbett-Gardener’s headstone was considered ‘not in keeping” with Great Malvern Cemetery, it was removed

4-Year-Old’s Headstone Removed Because One Person was Offended By It:
http://tribunist.com/news/4-year-olds-headstone-removed-because-one-person-was-offended-by-it/

A mother is devastated after the city council removed her deceased son’s headstone following a complaint from another family who said it wasn’t “in keeping” with their family member’s plot.

Max Corbett-Gardener was only 4 years old when he died from complications related to severe epilepsy. His mother, Jo Corbett-Weeks, scraped and saved for nearly three years to get an almost $5,000 specially-made headstone of a teddy bear holding a star inscribed with a heart touching tribute to her son.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: No right is sacred when it comes to control-freaks, and the governments they use to abuse the peaceful… Complaining about, and petitioning the government to steal, a deceased child’s gravestone is a new low, UK! And, that the State actually did it is even more despicable!

Licenses Are Merely Government Permission Slips for Rights We Already Have!

The following debate originally took place upon my Facebook wall, after I posted artwork being shared by the page, “The Liberty Principle: No Consent from the Governed“…

Rayn:

"A license is what you get when the government steals your rights away from you and then sells them back." - Mark Edge, Host of 'Free Talk Live'

“A license is what you get when the government steals your rights away from you and then sells them back.” – Mark Edge, Host of ‘Free Talk Live’

Daniel F.: So should one have an unqualified right to operate a motor vehicle despite not knowing how to operate it safely, or having shown a complete disregard for the safety of others while driving it? Should one have the “right” to endanger the safety of others, either through ignorance or complete disregard?

Now there IS way too much bureaucracy in all this – fees for renewing one’s license and registration, overzealous police patrolling the streets looking out for traffic and parking violations so they can issue summonses mainly for the purposes of bringing in revenue – while “fixing” tickets for their own friends and relatives. Meanwhile a fine that can cause significant financial hardship for a poor person will barely be of any inconvenience at all to a rich person despite both committing the same “offense”, which may or may not have any actual justifiable reason for existing at all. (Speed limits for instance – it should not be an offense simply to drive above some arbitrary preset limit; only if they are actually endangering others should there be cause for any sort of action against them.)

Rayn: LOLZ! A license is merely a highly overpriced government permission slip for the right to freely travel. It provides ZERO GUARANTEE that one actually has the ability to safely drive a car, nor that one will continue to maintain the ability to safely drive a car, and it certainly isn’t an indication that one will actually regard the safety of others when driving! You might not have noticed, but the vast majority of accidents that take place in America result from the actions and activity of “licensed” drivers! So, obviously, a “license” means almost nothing, in the scheme of “safety.”

Alternatively, plenty of individuals do have the ability to safely drive a car, while having no valid driver’s “license” to speak of. This is especially true when considering the fact that the government revokes and suspends the driver licenses of so many, year after year, as punishment for non-driver safety offenses – such as non-payment of “tickets,” non-payment of court fees, drug convictions, etc… Also, the mere act of letting a valid driver’s license “expire” (which is simply a euphemism for failure to REPAY for a license that was already adequately secured) will result in the revocation of a driver license, as well! (Interesting enough, such a situation makes a driver’s license an indirect tool of abuse against low-income individuals).

And, speaking of indirect State abuses that come with our current state of affairs, a “driver’s license” (and a “non-driver license” for that matter), are major tools of oppression in the arsenal of the police state, giving courts the ability to strip away the right to freely travel for non-driving related, victimless “crimes,” and giving cops the pretext to harass and warrantlessly search any person walking down the street. The latter especially true for individuals of color, and for the disabled – who are the most likely to be on the receiving end of such State activity.

As for your question, “should one have the ‘right’ to endanger the safety of others, either through ignorance or complete disregard,” the answer is “no.” We have a right to live, to self-ownership, and to peaceful co-existence. No one has the “right” to initiate harm against others, no matter the so-called “motivation.” But, this all has very little to do with a driver’s license, and everything to do with Individual action, ability, and responsibility.

One thing we can agree upon is the unnecessary bureaucracy involved, and the many abuses that come with it. Also, speed limits are also highly problematic, and indicative that the the rules of the road are about the State’s USUAL AGENDA: COMPLIANCE WITH AUTHORITY, and REVENUE COLLECTION – rather than “SAFETY”… (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)