Never Forget… Institutionalized Eugenics in America

I originally posted the following information and statement onto my Facebook wall…

"Buck v. Bell: In 1925, Virginia, like a majority of states then, enacted eugenic sterilization laws. Viriginia's law allowed state institutions to operate on individuals to prevent conception of what were believed to be 'genetically inferior' children. Charlottesville native, Carrie Buck (1906 - 1983), involuntarily committed to a state facility near Lynchburg, was chosen as the first person to be sterilized under the law. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Buck v. Bell, on 2 May 1927, affirmed the Virginia law. After Buck, mor than 8,000 other Virginians were sterlized before the most relevant parts of the act were repealed in 1974. Later evidence eventually showed that Buck and many others had no 'hereditary defects.' She is buried south of here." (Department of Historic Resources, 2002)

“Buck v. Bell: In 1925, Virginia, like a majority of states then, enacted eugenic sterilization laws. Viriginia’s law allowed state institutions to operate on individuals to prevent conception of what were believed to be ‘genetically inferior’ children. Charlottesville native, Carrie Buck (1906 – 1983), involuntarily committed to a state facility near Lynchburg, was chosen as the first person to be sterilized under the law. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Buck v. Bell, on 2 May 1927, affirmed the Virginia law. After Buck, mor than 8,000 other Virginians were sterlized before the most relevant parts of the act were repealed in 1974. Later evidence eventually showed that Buck and many others had no ‘hereditary defects.’ She is buried south of here.” (Department of Historic Resources, 2002)

Buck v. Bell:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_v._Bell

Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, “for the protection and health of the state” did not violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The decision was largely seen as an endorsement of negative eugenics—the attempt to improve the human race by eliminating “defectives” from the gene pool. The Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell.

(Read entire article here…)

Never forget…

What if Police Begin Labeling Their Reckless Murders “Collateral Damage”?

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

2016-08-20-what-if-police-begin-labeling-their-reckless-murders-collateral-damage

Chicago Cops Using State Law to Kill then Charging Innocent People for Murder They Committed:
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/chicago-cops-state-law-kill/

An investigation into 10 recent Chicago criminal cases unearthed the extraordinary reach of the state’s “felony murder rule,” which is being used to cover up police crime, as well as prosecute and incarcerate the innocent, according to a report.

“Among the ten recent felony murder cases…three stem from police officers firing at fleeing vehicles in apparent violation of the department’s ‘deadly force’ policy, which since February 2015 has forbidden the practice,”according to findings by the Chicago Reader.

The revelation came while investigating the case of Tevin Louis, who was charged and convicted of the murder of his friend, Marquise Sampson, even though Sampson was fatally shot by police on Chicago’s South Side.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: What if police just start calling their reckless murders of innocent bystanders and car passengers in their pursuit of suspects “collateral damage”? Will Americans start defending their actions? Or, is this practice only acceptable when the US military uses it as a label for the thousands of dead Iraqis, Afghanis, Pakistanis, Libyans, Yemenis, Somalians, and Syrians they’ve murdered in our name, and using our tax dollarsl? #InnocentLivesMatter
#CheckYourStatistPrivilege #DontLookNowButYourReligionIsShowing #BaalWorship

Obama-Led Drone Strikes Kill Innocents 90% of the Time in Afghanistan, in Just a Single Five-Month Campaign:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/15/90-of-people-killed-by-us-drone-strikes-in-afghani/

Most American Who Support War Are Merely Cowards

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “We Are Change,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"You only support war because you'll never actually have to meet the victims or see the devastation"

“You only support war because you’ll never actually have to meet the victims or see the devastation”

My Commentary: Cowardly…

Much Like His Predecessor, Obama is a Professional Actor, and a Pure Political Parasite

The following correspondence originally took place upon my Facebook wall, after I posted artwork being shared by the page, “Statism is a Religion“…

Rayn

"The two faces of a sociopath 1. Cries for child victims of gun violence 2. Murders children with drone bombs"

“The two faces of a sociopath
1. Cries for child victims of gun violence
2. Murders children with drone bombs”

Greg C.: Nice dentures Barrack you fake ass actor. You cry about guns like white people shouldn’t be allowed to have them. You didn’t cry when ISIS was beheading Christian children though – did you? You damn phony. You told 60 minutes you could win a 3rd term but the majority of this country despises you. I think Donald Trump or Cruz would give you the beating of your life in the next election. America can’t wait till you wave good bye and jet with that wife of yours…

Rayn: He’s definitely a straight-up actor, like his predecessor. Pure political parasites!

"Vote for Nobody *Nobody will keep elections promises *Nobody will listen to your concerns *Nobody will help the poor & destitute *Nobody cares about you & your family Nobody tells the truth."

“Vote for Nobody:
*Nobody will keep elections promises
*Nobody will listen to your concerns
*Nobody will help the poor & destitute
*Nobody cares about you & your family
Nobody tells the truth.”

 

Should Inanimate Objects Be Banned as “Dangerous,” or Should Individuals Simply Be Held Accountable for Their Own Actions?

The following debate originally took place upon the Facebook wall of family, after they posted a photo being shared by the page, “Young Americans for Liberty“…

Genaire:

“Used in fewer than 323 murders during 2011*. Used in 496 murders during 2011*. Which one should be banned? *(FBI annual crime statistics)”

Anke M.: Guns! All guns should be banned!

Genaire: I would agree if all guns were truly banned. Don’t let some have them and others not (that includes the police and military).

Anke M.: Could not agree more!

Anke M.:

Brian M.: People with long histories of non-violent conflict resolution should be forced to have more weapons. Give Gandhi a nuke.

Unable to keep the violent from weapons, the next best thing is to outgun the violent with people uninterested in violence.

Celebration of independence from tyranny should be demonstrated through the random discharge of explosives. Tyrants do not last in places where everyone can blow a person up.

Rayn: Fuck the State! Neither should be “banned,” as both are much-needed inventions, created for individual use!

Lest we forget, all of these worthless, obsolete “governments” in control of our planet can only legitimately claim legal jurisdiction over the lives of criminals! The innocent, meanwhile, are FREE! And, it’s precisely why the bureaucrats of each of these fraud-systems slowly and incrementally invent law after law to criminalize our humanity, while simultaneously legalizing their own criminality! It’s been the same process all over the world for thousands of years! Google “pathocracy” for more information!