Debating the Eugenics Behind Vaccinations

The following debate took place upon my post, “Over a Century of Vaccine Injuries and Deaths in Children

Rayn: Eugenics…

(Original post located here)

Jennifer H.: On which side?

Rayn: On the “official” side, like usual…

Rayn: Same target, as usual, too…

Jennifer H.: I’m not sure exactly what you’re trying to say. Can you clarify?

Rayn: Okay. Read the “product information sheet” for the MMR-II vaccine:

https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM123789.pdf

Pay special attention to the sections entitled, “Contraindications,” “Warnings,” “Precautions,” and “Adverse Reactions.”

Also, if you have been previously vaccinated at any time, exactly how many of those times were you, your parents, or guardian, given any sort of product insert to read over *before* making a final decision to “consent”? In my case, I can attest to receiving this information a full 0% of the time, over the course of a fifteen year period, spanning across doctor’s offices in three States, and through over a dozen needle jabs…

Jennifer H.: Literally every time, actually, because that’s what they’re for? I had to sign a consent form to get a flu shot.

Jennifer H.: Not sure what that has to do with eugenics but OK, at least I’m clear on what this is now.

Jennifer H.: If you choose not to read what you’re signing that’s on you. 💁🏼

Jennifer H.: So, out of curiosity, what exactly is using the threat of disability as a tool of fear called?

Jennifer H.: It sounds oddly familiar. Hmm…

Rayn: My parents never received one even once, not for myself, nor any of my three siblings. Can’t “choose not to read” what was never provided in two decades of vaccinations, across three States.

Jennifer H.: So the consent forms were…blank?

Jennifer H.: Still waiting for the answer to the original question, but I guess talking about package inserts is way easier than clarifying what “target” you’re talking about.

Jennifer H.: “If I derail enough, everyone will forget this was about eugenics!”

Jennifer H.: I wonder what letting people die of vaccine-preventable disease would be called. 🤔

Rayn: Using the threat of disability as a tool of fear? By all means, feel free to pontificate away…

Rayn.: “If I derail enough, everyone will forget this was about eugenics!” I knew you were speed-posting for a reason…

Rayn: Derail away… (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)

Flu Shot Recipients as Vectors for Spread of Influenza?

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Infectious Virus in Exhaled Breath of Symptomatic Seasonal Influenza Cases from a College Community:
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/01/17/1716561115

My Commentary: Hmmm… A 630% increase in aerosol viral shedding among those vaccinated for flu, versus those not vaccinated? Seems like those individuals receiving the flu shot become vectors for the spreading of influenza…

“…we observed 6.3 (95% CI 1.9–21.5) times more aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.”

The “Science” Behind Vaccinations Relies Upon Medically-Induced Human-Sacrifice of Weakest and Most Vulnerable Members of Society

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Beware of Disinformation,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"Blue Cross Blue Shield pays your doctor a $40,000 bonus for fully vaccinating 100 patients under the age of two. If your doctor manages to fully vaccinate 200 patients, that bonus jumps to $80,000. But, here's the catch: Under Blue Cross Blue Shield's rules, pediatricians lose the whole bonus unless at least 63% of patients are fully vaccinated, and that includes the flu vaccine. So, it's not just $400 on your child's head - it could be the whole bonus. To your doctor, your decision to vaccinate your child might be worth $40,000, or much more, depending on the size of his or her practice."

“Blue Cross Blue Shield pays your doctor a $40,000 bonus for fully vaccinating 100 patients under the age of two. If your doctor manages to fully vaccinate 200 patients, that bonus jumps to $80,000.
But, here’s the catch: Under Blue Cross Blue Shield’s rules, pediatricians lose the whole bonus unless at least 63% of patients are fully vaccinated, and that includes the flu vaccine. So, it’s not just $400 on your child’s head – it could be the whole bonus. To your doctor, your decision to vaccinate your child might be worth $40,000, or much more, depending on the size of his or her practice.”

My Commentary: Incentivizing eugenics…

The “science” behind vaccinations relies upon the medically-induced human-sacrifice of the weakest and most vulnerable in society in order to grant “immunity” to its stronger members. It’s basically just legalized soft-EUGENICS – a pseudo-science America has such a fondness for, and pioneered, for over a century*…

Read for yourself how the MMR vaccine “works”…

http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/measles/measles-vaccine-injury-death.aspx

While those with certain known medical issues are often directed by doctors not to take vaccinations for fear of injury, those who haven’t yet been diagnosed, due to the rarity of their illness, or a lack of adequate healthcare to have our identified, are in danger of vaccine injury or death. Plain and simple.

Statism is the ultimate cult of violence, coercion, human sacrifice and death-worship.

(* Hitler got many of his GREATEST eugenicist ideas about isolating, sterilizing and murdering “undesirables” from America!

The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics:
http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html

Eugenics and the Nazis — the California Connection:
http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/Eugenics-and-the-Nazis-the-California-2549771.php

These sorts of concepts were being fine-tuned by intellectual elitist control-freaks at places like Cold Spring Harbor laboratory, then promptly instituted legally in this country for over half a century!

Dark Chapter of American History – U.S. Court Battle Over Forced Sterilization:
http://www.commondreams.org/views/072100-106.htm

Eugenics Laws Restricting Immigration:
http://www.eugenicsarchive.org/html/eugenics/essay9text.html)

Discussing Baxter’s Convenient Patent of Celvapan, Along With Their ‘Accidental’ Adulteration of ‘Vaccine’ With Avian Flu

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Baxter’s H5N1 Avian Flu Virus Vaccine Conveniently Approved Just Months Before Company “Accidentally” Released “Vaccines” Contaminated with Exact Same Virus to 18 Countries“…

Celvapan

Celvapan

RaynBaxter’s Cell Culture-Based Pandemic Flu Vaccine Receives EMEA Positive Opinion:
http://biopharminternational.findpharma.com/biopharm/Baxters-Cell-Culture-Based-Pandemic-Flu-Vaccine-Re/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/575432?ref=25

Due to the fact that the world narrowly averted a global avian flu pandemic this month due to the diligence of the good individuals at the National Microbiology Laboratory in Canada, I decided to further research the topic today, and came upon this article, dated January 19, 2009. As it turns out, the company responsible for almost causing the above-mentioned bio-disaster, Baxter International Inc., just so happens to own the rights to “Celvapan,” the world’s first cell-culture based H5N1 (avian flu) pandemic vaccine! Apparently, though it’s still in trial stages, it is very close to receiving full market authorization from the European Union. In other words, if a global avian flu pandemic ever did take place, Baxter International would be in a position to make a great deal of money!!!

Rebekah P.: A sickening snake eating its own tail!!!

Rayn: Well, since Baxter made no real effort to cover their tracks, and destroyed no evidence, as I found this article online relatively easily (they could have had it removed), I’d say they more resemble a diseased parasite – feeding on its host until its host dies, even at the risk of dying itself!

Vaccinate Against “Avian Flu,” or Refuse Dangerous Inoculation?

The following debate originally took place upon the Facebook wall of family…

2009-09-30 - Vaccinate Against 'Avian Flu,' or Refuse Dangerous Inoculation

Sara: I refuse a man-made vaccine for a man-made illness!

Kathleen M.: Prove to me that it is man-made, that the idea isn’t just another conspiracy theory, and I might consider listening to you. The vaccine isn’t any worse than the regular flu shot. Yes, you get a little buggy from it, but most healthy people are not going to die from it. What advantage does it give the government to kill or seriously impair most of their taxpayers?

I’m all for holistic medicine, but most of these guys are just quacks.

In the end, just because something is a vaccine does not make it “man-made.” We do not have the understanding to alter genetics of something as complicated as a virus to get a specific result.

Rayn: Good post, Sara! Since March of this year, when Baxter International almost caused a worldwide pandemic after it shipped vaccines contaminated with deadly avian flu to 18 different countries, I’ve been warning others about a concerted effort by certain pharmaceutical corporations to infect the entire populace with a deadly virus under the pretext of a “vaccination program.” I’ve also talked about the dangers of taking any type of vaccination for the “swine flu,” or allowing the government to implement any mass vaccination program using the help of these particular companies, whether in the name of “the public good,” or under the pretense of a pandemic.

(Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)