The following correspondence originally took place upon my Facebook wall of an acquaintance, after he shared artwork from here…
Om P.:
“Syria – ISIS”
Rayn: Attacking another straw boogie man…
The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of an acquaintance…
Emily T.: A Day Before the Paris Attack, Suicide Bombers Killed 43 in Beirut:
http://mic.com/articles/128551/terrorist-suicide-bombing-attack-on-beirut-lebanon-kills-43-and-injures-hundreds
“A day before the Paris attacks that left at least 120 dead and the country in lockdown, suicide bombings in Beirut on Thursday left 43 dead and 239 wounded. According to a terrorist who survived, the attack was reportedly carried out by an ISIS cell sent to Lebanon from the group’s stronghold in Syria.
The explosions took place in the southern part of the city near a busy open-air market in the Bourj al-Barajneh district. A number of ISIS-linked Twitter accounts have claimed responsibility for the attack, though nothing could be independently confirmed, according to CNN.”
Donna M.: actually…outside of the USA… we did hear about it.
Erica D.: I’ve heard that European media is more likely to cover violence (both domestic and foreign) that has targeted primarily people of color.
Kathleen L.: Yes- when no white people are killed white people are much less concerned
Yaacoub H.: Lest we forget Emily ??????????
Kis B.: Kenya was an error for some reason it came up in a few places as breaking news but it happening in April.
Rayn: Interestingly enough, not a single Individual feels that the origins of ISIS are worth mentioning, either.
Truth in Media: Origin of ISIS:
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/02/truth-in-media-origin-of-isis.html
Here’s some other helpful articles:
How the US Fueled the Rise of ISIS in Syria and Iraq:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/03/us-isis-syria-iraq?CMP=share_btn_fb
Made in the USA: Report Shows ISIS Using US Arms from ‘Syria Rebels’:
http://news.antiwar.com/2014/09/08/made-in-the-usa-report-shows-isis-using-us-arms-from-syria-rebels/
This is The Hegelian Dialectic, in action: PROBLEM, REACTION, SOLUTION.
Emily T.: We always seem to arm and support people who later turn out to be terrible, or who we decide we don’t like, don’t we?
Kis B.: I think because this was well known and reported when they emerged and a lot of discussion about how time and time again the US has dropped off weapons to aid their goal for them to wind up in the hands of terrorists.
The much better missiles fired at Israel last summer were all of US providence. Dropped of en massed to prolong the Arab Spring. They had never previously been able to boast they could hit any house in Israel and barring the iron dome the could. If they had wanted to they could have hit other countries too.
So I wondered why no one asked the logical question in a summer where Obama changed his mind so often where was the why would you destroy a country looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction and not at least come pick up the dangerous crap you leave behind..
The second pressing question was why was John Kerry hovering around in Europe trying to broker peace when Egypt was filling that role.
Molly K.: I did hear about it in Sacramento, but we often hear about things like this that the rest of the country doesn’t seem to – I wonder if it’s because we’re so much more diverse than a lot of cities (apparently, we’re the most diverse city in the country, or close to)
Stephen H.: So sad
The following correspondence originally took place on the Facebook wall of family, upon the post, “Discussion on Cowards-That-Be Continuing to Push for War with Iran“…
“No war in Iran”
Genaire: Well it looks like we will be at war with Iran in the next few days, then of course, Syria.
Jason O.: & why is this?
Rayn: Let’s just hope the globalist control freaks aren’t that stupid…
Genaire: The war with Iraq wasn’t over the world trade or bringing Democracy to the region. Our goal has always been to get a pipeline in that region to the Caspian Sea. So we are presently at war with Iraq, Afghanistan then next in line would be Iran and Syria. We are going to use Iran’s nuclear reactor as the excuse.
Keith M.: Its not election season yet.
Rayn: Very true about the pipeline, and very possible about the attack on Iran. I predicted the same thing in 2007:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2007/250607pers.htm(Artwork by Rayn)
If it does go down, Israel will begin the war with an airstrike Iran, so that America can claim defense of an “ally” when our military becomes involved…
Rayn: According to Wiki: “United States Senate are scheduled to be held on November 2, 2010, for 37 of the 100 seats in the United States Senate.”
That’s about 11 weeks from now…
Keith M.: Oh.. No.
Genaire: He needs an event now to help with his approval ratings.
Genaire: Israel Has Three Days to Stop Iran Developing Nuclear Weapons, Warns Former U.S. Ambassador:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1303892/John-Bolton-Israel-3-days-stop-Iran-developing-nuclear-weapons.html
Anke M.: I don’t know why this is on newsfeed now, it was stupid then and it is stupid still!
Genaire: Anke, It’s actually pretty prophetic. Yes I was off about how long it would take but low and behold I predicted these warmongers would be attacking Syria way back in 2010. Next up of course is Iran. With Russia on the field they more than likely will back down since they only attack countries with no hope of truly defending themselves.
Rayn: Here’s my artwork from June 2007: http://www.infowars.com/images2/cartoons/250607masterrm9.jpg
(Artwork by Rayn)
Anke M.: We and other Nations have a deal with Iran! Thanks President Obama. And you’re welcome Genaire.
Genaire: Yes and I’m glad. That deal is very shaky at this point. The minute the office changes hands I doubt the deal will hold up.
Anke M.: It will stand for many reasons even if God forbid a republican gets elected, which will not happen, at any rate we are just one of several Nations that reached the agreement and even a republican will think twice about unilaterally pulling out of such a significant deal.
Genaire: That agreement as we both know doesn’t have the support of either parties. So if God forbid a socialist I mean a democrat gets in office the agreement will be just as shaky as if a republican was in office. Specially if warmonger Hillary wins the election.
As far as the other nations go. The minute we pull away from the deal they will quickly follow.
Rayn: Repeat after me: “Operation Ajax never took place” 😉 Now, *firmly* place head in sand.
Anke M.: I am truly amazed at the total lack of nuance and reason in your comments. The stupidity is overwhelming. And Rayn’s weird conspiracy theories I can certainly do without!
Genaire: Then gladly unfollow me Anke. Your socialist comments no longer show up on my wall for months now.
Anke M.: I don’t know how…..Ha!
Rayn: That awkward moment when a so-called conspiracy “theory” turns out to be conspiracy FACT:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27état
Genaire: Operation Ajax is not a conspiracy theory. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d’état
Rayn: An oversight, perhaps?
Anke M.: Oh for gods sake, talking about the CIA aided coup that got the Sjah on the throne? Grow up, you guys were not even born yet! Mossadeque was no angel, in global politics sometimes the end justifies the means! I remember it well, and subsequently became friends with queen Farahdibah after the Shah passed away, and her kids went to school with my son. That has nothing to do with this of course, but geopolitics are complicated .
Genaire: We can’t get caught attempting a coup on another nation then expect the relations between us and that nation to not forever be in turmoil. The ends in this case justifies the years and years of continued tensions between our two nations.
Genaire: Don’t really see what’s so complicated about leaving people alone. If they have not physically agressed against us we should not physically agrees against them.
If Saudi Arabia attacks us we should not use that as an excuse to attack Iraq.
Genaire: Are we now acknowledging the fact that it wasn’t a conspiracy theory?
Rayn: So, first it was a “conspiracy theory,” but then, when that falsehood is straight debunked with fact, without missing a beat, you then just outright admit that you’re okay with the CIA overthrowing democratically elected leaders of foreign countries because “Mossadeque was no angel” and “sometimes the end justifies the means”? Time to face the truth: you support war criminals, rather than peace!
Genaire: I’ll simplify it. Innocent people are being killed over these geopolitics. The ends do not justify the means. The means being the United States having control over other sovereign nations oil and dictating how they treat their populace.
Rayn: If that same illegitimate “no angel… end justifies means” argument was used to overthrow the US government, I wonder what war-criminal apologists like you would be saying, then.
I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…
President Barack Obama
Obama’s Anti-ISIS War in Syria May Be Illegal:
http://time.com/3328080/isis-syria-aumf-obama-law/
(Massimo Calabresi, Time) Obama is relying on questionable legal authority in his pursuit of terrorists, but that never stopped George W. Bush.
If truth is the first casualty of war, law is apparently the last, at least for President Barack Obama.
Obama came to office declaring his determination to reimpose legal limits on the American effort to defeat al Qaeda. He swore to close Guantanamo Bay, abolish torture, tighten rules for the treatment of terrorist prisoners and rein in the broad executive power President George W. Bush had claimed in the global hunt for terrorists.
But after five-and-a-half years of near-constant terrorist brush fires in Africa, the Middle East and South Asia, and a Congress that remains largely unwilling to update key counterterrorism legislation, Obama appears finally to have surrendered to a very loose legal definition of where and when he can use military force against terrorists.
My Commentary: “May be illegal?” Since when are wars of aggression EVER NOT OUTRIGHT CRIMINAL!!?
Bush 2.0 continues on with the same lying, thieving, civilian-murdering agenda of the robber-class that helped put him in office, in the first place. And, without a single hitch, the willfully ignorant majority continues to support him! “ISIS” is just another American-invented straw boogie man, much like the Mujahideen, the M.A.K., Al Qaeda, the Taliban, the LIFG, and many others!
The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of my friend, Jonas A., after he shared artwork from here…
Jonas A.: Both are equal and opposite of the same BS we all are dealing with….time to boot them all out!
“If you haven’t figured it out by now…
These are corporate spokesmen, not leaders.
They both started illegal wars, tortured people,
bailed out criminal corporations, spied on you,
violated the Constitution, and committed war crimes.
What is it going to take to wake you up?”
Lynne C.: Ok…I’m confused….just what war did Obama start???
Jonas A.: One started…the other just continued the program….
Lynne C.: Correct me if I’m wrong….but Obama is bringing the military home. I’m Canadian and its on our news up here….WorldTruth seems to be blowing wind as far as I’m concerned.
Rayn: To answer your question, Lynne. Obama has authorized the US military to engage in illegal warfare against the nations of Yemen, Libya, Somalia and Syria, on top of continuing with Bush’s wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan. I hope this information alleviates your confusion.
Lynne C.: A person doesn’t know who or what to believe any more….that I am sure of.
Rayn: Only believe the facts. 😉 (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)
