The “Social Justice” of Cultural Marxism, On Full Display at Reed College

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Film director, Kimberly Peirce

Film director, Kimberly Peirce

Leftist Students Shouted ‘F*ck You B*itch’ at the Gay Director of a Pro-Trans Movie, Boys Don’t Cry:
http://reason.com/blog/2016/12/09/leftist-students-shouted-fck-you-bitch-a

() There was a time not so long ago when the people shouting “fuck you bitch” at a gender-fluid gay filmmaker would have been bigoted right-wing conservatives. But because we currently live in the year 2016, the people who heckled Kimberly Peirce—director of Boys Don’t Cry, a groundbreaking film about a transgender man—during her recent appearance at Reed College were far-left students.

The students hurled a litany of insults at Peirce, putting up posters that read “fuck your transphobia” and “you don’t fucking get it” among other things. Worse, when Peirce ascended to her podium, students had placed a sign there. It read “fuck this cis white bitch.” That Peirce is actually gender-fluid is quite beside the point.

The students’ unbelievable rudeness crossed the line into a kind of censorship when Peirce tried to speak: the students simply shouted over her. Eventually they let her talk, but some students continued to yell things like “fuck your respectability politics” and “fuck you scared bitch.”

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: A crowd of totally hypocritical “social justice” wannabes at Reed college had no problem repeatedly chanting “fuck you bitch” at “Boys Don’t Cry” director Kimberly Peirce, while attempting to drown out the director’s voice out with the phrase, “fuck you, scared bitch.” They also strategically placed a sign on the speaker’s podium the director was to use, which read, “fuck this cis white bitch.” (Ironically, as if the sexism inherent to all of these attacks wasn’t enough to raise alarm bells, the article is sure to note that Peirce identifies as “gender-fluid,” revealing just how many levels of hypocritical the crowd truly was, as they even broke the very first rule of “identity politics,” in their crusade against the director, through blatant, purposeful, hostility-ridden “misidentification”).

The crowd held up signs that read, “fuck your transphobia” and “fuck your respectability politics.” So, what was the director’s alleged crime, according to this mob? Well… Casting non-trans actor, Hillary Swank, to play Brandon Teena in the famous 1999 film, for one… But, also, profiting from violence against trans people.

So, there you have it: the “social justice” of cultural Marxism, on full display, in all of its rotten non-glory. The professional victim culture that drives it has always represented nothing more than a carefully-crafted and cleverly-worded race to the bottom. It is just a pathologically pathetic contest, wherein the most ineffectual, unproductive, and rage-filed little cry-bully is able to win the much-coveted participation trophy that comes with whiny contributions of absolutely nothing to society!

Discussing One of the Many Fallacies of Cultural Marxism

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Cultural Marxism: Because Equality in Slavery is More Desirable Than Equality in Freedom…“…

2016-09-08-discussing-one-of-the-many-fallacies-of-cultural-marxism-1

RaynAcademic Study: Having a Loving Family is Unfair:
https://stream.org/academic-study-having-a-loving-family-unfair/

Cultural Marxism: when equality in slavery is more desirable than equality in freedom…

From the article: “One way philosophers might think about solving the social justice problem,” they explain, “would be by simply abolishing the family. If the family is this source of unfairness in society then it looks plausible to think that if we abolished the family there would be a more level playing field.”

“‘The evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t — the difference in their life chances — is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,’” they wrote.

“I don’t think parents reading their children bedtime stories should constantly have in their minds the way that they are unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children, but I think they should have that thought occasionally,’ quips Swift.”

Sickening, pseudo-intellectual drivel…

Stacie T.:

"Tell me it isn't possible for people to be this motherfuckin' stupid"

“Tell me it isn’t possible for people to be this motherfuckin’ stupid”

Cultural Marxism: Because Equality in Slavery is More Desirable Than Equality in Freedom…

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

2016-09-07-cultural-marxism-because-equality-in-slavery-is-more-desirable-than-equality-in-freedom

Academic Study: Having a Loving Family is Unfair:
https://stream.org/academic-study-having-a-loving-family-unfair/

(Amelia Hamilton) It seems obvious that parents should love their children, and that a loving family is something for which we should all strive. I’m not so naive as to suppose that this is always the case, but it should certainly be the goal of our society. Unfortunately, there are those who don’t feel that way. Recently, a piece in ABC Australia posed the question, “Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?” Seriously.

The piece sets out their basic argument: ”The power of the family to tilt equality hasn’t gone unnoticed, and academics and public commentators have been blowing the whistle for some time. Now, philosophers Adam Swift and Harry Brighouse have felt compelled to conduct a cool reassessment.”

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Cultural Marxism: when equality in slavery is more desirable than equality in freedom…

From the article: “One way philosophers might think about solving the social justice problem,” they explain, “would be by simply abolishing the family. If the family is this source of unfairness in society then it looks plausible to think that if we abolished the family there would be a more level playing field.”

“‘The evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t — the difference in their life chances — is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,’” they wrote.

“I don’t think parents reading their children bedtime stories should constantly have in their minds the way that they are unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children, but I think they should have that thought occasionally,’ quips Swift.”

Sickening, pseudo-intellectual drivel…

Seeking to Remove the Freedoms of Others Due to Being Offended is Tyrannical

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “V is For Voluntary,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"If you seek the removal of freedoms from an opponent, simply on the grounds that they have offended you, you have crossed a line to stand alongside tyrants." - J.K. Rowlings

“If you seek the removal of freedoms from an opponent, simply on the grounds that they have offended you, you have crossed a line to stand alongside tyrants.” – J.K. Rowlings

My Commentary: Here’s one for the cultural Marxists…