Discussing Saartjie Baartman

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Who Was Saartjie Baartman?“…

Saartjie Baartman

Rayn: ♫ “The more you know…” ♫

The Life and Death of Saartjie Baartman:
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2007/mar/31/featuresreviews.guardianreview12

Rayn: The More You Know:

Last Prince: Lol…

Eartha M.: Yup!

Jason L.: Unbelievable

Who Was Saartjie Baartman?

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Saartjie Baartman

Saartjie Baartman

The Life and Death of Saartjie Baartman:
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2007/mar/31/featuresreviews.guardianreview12

The body of Saartjie Baartman, better known as the Hottentot Venus, has had greater influence on the iconography of the female body in European art and visual culture than any other African woman of the colonial era. Saartjie, a South African showgirl in the early 19th century, was a small, beautiful woman, with an irresistible bottom. Of a build unremarkable in an African context, to some western European eyes she was extraordinary. Today, she is celebrated as bootylicious.

Saartjie was not only the African woman most frequently represented in racially marked British and French visual culture, she also had less immediately visible influences on western art. In an age when art and science were commonly regarded as bedfellows, her image appeared in a proliferation of media, from popular to high culture. Saartjie was depicted in scientific and anatomical drawings, in playbills and aquatint posters, in cartoons, paintings and sculpture. Both during her life and after her death, caricaturists Thomas Rowlandson and George Cruikshank made her the subject of works typifying London life and the Napoleonic era. Saartjie’s body cast was one of the inspirations for Matisse’s revolutionary restructuring of the female body in The Blue Nude (1907), prompted by African sculpture and conceived, as Hugh Honour argues, “as an ‘African’ Venus: that her skin is not black is hardly of significance in view of his attitude to colour”.

Who was Saartjie Baartman? Not a question anyone will ask in South Africa, where she is a national icon; nor in America, where her life, legend and relevance are well understood. Yet in Britain, where she came to fame and had such an influence, she is less well remembered. Rumoured to be a slave brought to England against her will, Saartjie was an orphaned Khoisan maidservant born in 1789 on the eastern frontier of the Cape Colony. She was 21 years old when she was smuggled from Cape Town to London. Her employer, a free black man named Hendrik Cesars, was manservant to a British Army medical officer named Alexander Dunlop. Dunlop persuaded Cesars that Saartjie had lucrative potential as entertainment and a scientific curiosity in England, which had a thriving stage trade in human and scientific curiosities. A woman from the so-called “Hottentot tribe”, who, legend held, had amazing buttocks and strangely elongated labia, might provide an exceptional draw. Saartjie was persuaded: Dunlop, she said, had “promised to send her back rich”.

(Read entire book review here…)

My Commentary: ♫ “The more you know…” ♫

Necessity is the Argument of Tyrants and the Creed of Slaves

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Independent Institute,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; is it the creed of slaves." - William Pitt the Younger

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; is it the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt the Younger

My Commentary: This quote always pops into my head whenever I hear a Statheist claim that the perpetual-by-design “War on Drugs” and/or “War on Terror” are “necessary.”

Discussing Silence in the Face of Tyranny As the Answer of a Slave

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “Silence in the Face of Tyranny is the Answer of a Slave“…

Rayn: Silence? “That is a slave’s answer!

“If You’re Afraid to Speak Out Against Tyranny, You Are ALREADY A SLAVE”

Renat S.: What about stoicism?

Renat S.: (i didn’t say i am a part of it)

Rayn: Being “afraid to speak” isn’t stoicism, as far as I can tell. 🙂

Renat S.: being afraid isn’t always the only reason of silence

RaynAbsolutely. The statement in the above graphic is simply an “if-then” logic clause. It pertains only to situations of silence based on fear. In the reality outside of the exclusionary “if” referenced here, there are many other reasons for not speaking. Some are philosophical, such as the stoicism you previously mentioned, while others are physical, as is the case with deaf mutes. 🙂

Renat S.: indeed

Silence in the Face of Tyranny is the Answer of a Slave

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Freedom From Mental Slavery,” and originally posted it to my own wall…

“If You’re Afraid to Speak Out Against Tyranny, You Are ALREADY A SLAVE”

My Commentary: Silence? “That is a slave’s answer!”