Huey P. Newton Gun Club Protests Police Violence with Open Carry March

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Huey P. Newton Gun Club gathered to march through South Dallas, Texas

Huey P. Newton Gun Club gathered to march through South Dallas, Texas

Huey P. Newton Gun Club Pushes #BlackOpenCarry to Protest Police Violence:
http://reason.com/blog/2014/08/20/black-open-carry-in-dallas

(Elizabeth Nolan Brown, Reason) In Texas, blacks are protesting police violence in a particularly Southwestern way: By invoking their right to open carry. On Wednesday, more than 30 membersof the newly-formed Huey P. Newton Gun Club gathered to march through South Dallas with rifles, shotguns, and AR-15s. The group eventually entered a restaurant with their weapons while Dallas police officers were inside eating lunch.

“The recent murders of unarmed black, brown, and whites across the United States of America has eradicated trust in the police,” the gun club’s website states.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Ha! I hope this makes some liberal heads explode! Too bad this club is located in Dallas!

I can hear the leftists, already… “But, it’s more ‘moral’ to be executed by police then to defend yourself against them! They’re just doing their job! What if we all fought back against executions? What would happen, then? Do you LIKE chaos?”

Discussing the Hard Truth That Gun Control is NOT “Anti-Gun”

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “News Flash: Gun Control is NOT ‘Anti-Gun’!“…

Rayn: Would you like some knee-pads to go with that dust you’re eating, boot-licker?

Keep calling yourself “anti-gun”… 🙂 I always enjoy a good laugh!

"GUN CONTROL is the worst kind of PRO-GUN"

“GUN CONTROL is the worst kind of PRO-GUN”

Jonas A.: yep! Exactly!!!

John T.: Bootlicker is funny, but it pays. Lol

News Flash: Gun Control is NOT “Anti-Gun”!

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Freedom Is A State Of Mind,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"GUN CONTROL is the worst kind of PRO-GUN"

“GUN CONTROL is the worst kind of PRO-GUN”

My Commentary: Would you like some knee-pads to go with that dust you’re eating, boot-licker?

Keep calling yourself “anti-gun”… 🙂 I always enjoy a good laugh!

From Overseer to Officer

The following correspondence originally took place here, upon the Facebook page, “United Against Police Terror – San Diego

United Against Police Terror – Sand Diego:

"From overseer to officer: the history of policing in America"

“From overseer to officer: the history of policing in America”

#FROMOVERSEERTOOFFICER #UAPTSD BY #AARONLEAF AKA #IRATE
Colonial America experienced an increase in population in major cities during the 1700s. Some of these cities began to see an influx of immigrant groups moving in from various countries(including Germany, Ireland, Italy, and several Scandinavian countries), which directly contributed to the rapid increase in population. The growth in population also created an increase in social disorder and unrest. The sources of social tension varied across different regions of Colonial America; however, the introduction of new racial and ethnic groups was identified as a common source of discord. Racial and ethnic conflict was a problem across Colonial America,including both the northern and southern regions of the country. Since the watch groups could no longer cope with this change in the social climate, more formalized means of policing began to take shape. Most of the historical literature neglects to document the events that took place in the southern region—specifically, the creation of slave patrols in the South.
Slave Patrols
Slave patrols (or Paddy Rollers) first emerged in South Carolina in the early 1700s, but historical documents also identify the existence of slave patrols in most other parts of the southern region .Samuel Walker identified slave patrols as the first publicly funded police agencies in the American South. Slave patrols were created to manage the race-based conflict occurring in the southern region of Colonial America; these patrols were created with the specific intent of maintaining control over slave populations. Three principal duties placed on slave patrols in the South during this time, including searches of slave lodges, keeping slaves off of roadways, and disassembling meetings organized by groups of slaves. Slave Patrols were known for their high level of brutality and ruthlessness as they maintained control over the slave population. The members of slave patrols were usually White males (occasionally a few women) from every echelon in the social strata, ranging from very poor individuals to plantation owners that wanted to ensure control over their slaves. Slave patrols remained in place during the Civil War and were not completely disbanded after slavery ended. During early Reconstruction, several groups merged with what was formerly known as slave patrols to maintain control over African American citizens. Groups such as the federal military, the state militia, and the Ku Klux Klan took over the responsibilities of earlier slave patrols and were known to be even more violent than their predecessors. Over time, these groups began to resemble and operate similar to some of the newly established police departments in the United States. In fact, By 1837, the Charleston Police Department had 100officers and the primary function of this organization was slave patrol, these officers regulated the movements of slaves and free blacks, checking documents, enforcing slave codes, guarding against slave revolts and catching runaway slaves.” Scholars and historians assert that the transition from slave patrols to publicly funded police agencies was seamless in the southern region of the United States.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/207464412/From-Overseer-to-Officer

Rayn: Indeed! KRS-One agrees!

Sound of da Police – KRS-One:

Gun-Free Zones Only Enable and Embolden Mass Shooters

The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of my friend, Jonas A…

Jonas A.: This dude does have a very good point…that’s why random shooters don’t target police stations….

Concealed Carry + Mass Shooting = More Carnage?:

Rayn:  Gun-Free Zone = Guaranteed 100% Defenseless Victims

“Gun-Free Zone Guaranteed 100% Defenseless Victims”

Brian K.: You seem to assume that guns are the only means of defense

Rielly J.: I myself am a libertarian thus I embrace the non aggression principal so it’s obvious that I support gun ownership. The thing that differentiates the non aggression principal from pacifism is that it does not preclude violence as a form of self defense or the defense of others.

Jonas A.: Very true….weapons of any kind should only be used as self defense…nothing should deviate from my libertarian principles either!

David C.: this dude knows whats up. thanks for sharing this!

Rielly J.: The non aggression principal is even incorporated in to our national seal: the eagle holds 13 arrows (the symbol of war) in one talon and an olive branch in the other and it is looking over the olive branch. We are supposed to be a nation that prefers peace but is comfortable with war (although this is not how we have been since the late 80s)

Jonas A.: You’re most welcome! And yeah, non-aggression as defined by the national seal or our constitution should not be a piece of paper, which is what current admins have been doing since Reagan…