But, Without Police, Who Would Steal Tax-Funded Gun Supplies, and Sell it Back to the Public?

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Ex-Delaware County sheriff’s deputy, Arlan Johnson

Ex-Delaware County sheriff’s deputy, Arlan Johnson

Ex-Deputy Gets Home Detention for Ammo Theft:
http://www.thestarpress.com/story/news/crime/2016/08/11/ex-deputy-gets-home-detention-ammo-theft/88571402/

() A retired Delaware County sheriff’s deputy was sentenced to six months of home detention Thursday after admitting to stealing county-owned ammunition.

“I want to apologize to everybody,” Arlan Johnson said during his sentencing hearing, in U.S. District Court. “I’ve let everybody down.”

Judge Tanya Walton Pratt also ruled that Johnson would serve three years on probation.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: “Hero cop gives back to the community”

Taxation is Theft

The following debate originally took place upon my Facebook wall, after I posted artwork being shared by the page, “Campaign for Liberty“…

Rayn:

2016-04-19-taxation-is-theft-1

“TA_ATION I_ THE_T”

Morgan S.: beats the hell out of me.

Rayn: 🙂

Morgan: i dont know if it is all one word or what the thing is. ..it is something I have never heard of .

David L.: Taxation is theft?

Morgan S.: maybe? who really knows. right? I mean it could be a Latin word for a thing? but giving that it is shared from a campaign for liberty page. you are probably right but it is not a true statement because how would a nation exist with out taxes.? communism? with out a some form of governing body, you would have a lawless society that sadly most of our great grand parents and us would not be alive.they would have likely been killed by a bad person.

David L.: I agree that taxes are needed, its how the tax money is used afterward that is the conundrum.

Rayn: You’ve guessed correctly, David. And, the statement is absolutely true, Morgan. The existence of a “nation” doesn’t supersede the existence of the Individuals within it. Meanwhile, individuals cannot simply relegate rights which they don’t have, themselves, to others, no matter how much they imagine that such activity would somehow eliminate the lack of morality inherent to the unjust acts they seek to commit, by proxy – nor will it relinquish them of personal responsibility for the acts now being committed in their name. Since you and I have no right to take money from others without their consent, neither does the State! It wouldn’t matter if we tossed out the claim that it was for the “greater good,” or if we used some of the stolen money to buy our victim a service he also didn’t consent to, as we pocketed some for ourselves as payment for arranging said service. It would be a criminal act, regardless. It’s probably disappointing to hear this, if you’re a member of the Statist cult, but… yeah… true morality is universal, like that.

Rayn: To that, David, I quote William Pitt: “Necessity is the argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves.” (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)

Committing Theft Under Color of Law

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “I Fucking Hate Government,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"An inconvenient truth

“An inconvenient truth: in 2014, all the criminals in the U.S. stole a total of $3.9 billion from citizens… and police stole $4.5 billion from citizens through civil asset forfeiture – $600 million more than all the criminals combined.”

My Commentary: But, without government, who would commit theft, under color of law?

But, Without Government, Who Would Commit Armed Robbery Under Color of Law?

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Cops Are merely crooked criminals in costumes

Cops Are merely crooked criminals in costumes

Law Enforcement Took More Stuff from People Than Burglars Did Last Year:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/11/23/cops-took-more-stuff-from-people-than-burglars-did-last-year/

(Washington PostChristopher Ingraham) Here’s an interesting factoid about contemporary policing: In 2014, for the first time ever, law enforcement officers took more property from American citizens than burglars did. Martin Armstrong pointed this out at his blog, Armstrong Economics, last week.

Officers can take cash and property from people without convicting or even charging them with a crime — yes, really! — through the highly controversial practice known as civil asset forfeiture. Last year, according to the Institute for Justice, the Treasury and Justice departments deposited more than $5 billion into their respective asset forfeiture funds. That same year, the FBI reports that burglary losses topped out at $3.5 billion.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: But, without government, who would commit armed robbery under color of law?

Decimating Disinformation Regarding Ms. Lauryn Hill’s Stand Against the Theft of Taxation

The following correspondence originally took place here, on the Facebook wall of Ms. Lauryn Hill

"Taxation is theft"

“Taxation is theft”

Marybett M.: So you’re PROUD to say you didn’t pay taxes cuz your ancestors were slaves. Hmmmm my ancestors died trying to free yours but I sure don’t hear “thank you”. More over if you did any kind of real research you would realize iSLAM is the “original slave trader.”

Yet today both our ancestors are dead. I DO THE NEXT RIGHT THING THAT ALLOWS YOU TO DRIVE OVER BRIDGES, FUND YOUR LAW ENFORCEMENT……
I don’t sit down on a pity pot and WHINE!
JS

Rayn: You are simply regurgitating DISINFORMATION that is being circulated by the mainstream media monopoly for the purposes of discrediting Ms. Hill, and emotionally riling up those who aren’t interested in doing their own research about the situation! Lauryn Hill stated EXACTLY why she withheld paying taxes on her very own Tumblr page, if you are really interested:

http://mslaurynhill.com/post/24689947994/it-was-reported-yesterday-that-ms-lauryn-hill-has

Marybett M.Regurgitating disinformation. Yes I do understand that cycle. You give mainstream a topic especially on someone who they don’t like their views on and it will be recycled refurgitation.
However I did come across this quote. “She explained that she hasn’t paid taxes since she withdrew from society to guarantee the safety and well-being of herself and her family.”

If it’s true, I can appreciate the intent to withdraw from society because of it’s moral corruption, I GET THAT AND SO DO MANY OTHERS. However, it still stands that we have to “render to ceasar…”

Personally, if she’s that principled and has the courage to withstand what lamestream may say, she could certainly earn doing tours. There are many that support that same view especially if there’s any “spirituality” in that as well.
It’s hard to stand up to the system but you still have to do the next right thing.