Discussing the Origins of New-Wave Feminism

The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of family…

Genaire

Rayn: “Feminist” Margaret Sanger, founder of “Planned Parenthood,” was nothing more than a total racist, and a genocidal eugenicist. She outright exposed her murderous, devil-worshiping ideology when she stated:

“Birth Control is not contraception indiscriminately and thoughtlessly practiced. It means the release and cultivation of the better racial elements in our society, and the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extirpation of defective stocks — those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.” (citation: “Apostle of Birth Control Sees Cause Gaining Here”, The New York Times, 1923-04-08)

Those who defend this soulless lizard, and her wicked organization, are typical either historically illiterate, willfully ignorant, or repugnant racists, eagerly-supportive of the age-old State-sponsored destruction of minority groups, and the poor. The fact that this devilry is currently being repackaged as “woman’s rights” is no excuse for supporting it, and really, only highlights just how low the lemming-like among us will go to virtue-signal a most shallow, imagined, and establishment-programmed concept of morality to the rest of society, even in the face of reality. The whole doublethink mentality fueling this issue is mind-blowing.

#FuckAbortion
#FuckEugenics
#FuckIgnorance
#FuckMargaretSanger
#FuckPlannedParenthood
#FuckNewWaveFeminism

Michael A.: The lady in the video is wrong white females did not get a lot of rights at the same time as men. They could not vote for a long time and so many other things

Genaire: That’s not what she said. She said black females got their rights at the same time as black men. While white women were complaining about equality from their male counterparts both black men and black women were slaves.

Genaire: That’s not what she said. She said black females got their rights at the same time as black men. While white women were complaining about equality from their male counterparts both black men and black women were slaves.

Joshua G.: That’s real life for sure

Judge Admits On Camera that Extorting the Public Over Victimless Crimes is His “Job Security”

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Magistrate Joe Licata and defendent, Robin Clearey, in a Harris County, Texas courtroom

Magistrate Joe Licata and defendent, Robin Clearey, in a Harris County, Texas, courtroom

Harris County Judge Says Arrests of Poor People Good for Job Security:
http://www.houstonpress.com/news/harris-county-judge-says-arrests-of-poor-people-good-for-job-security-8950616

(Meagan Flynn) The driving infractions and fines had piled up on Robin Clearey, who stood before Magistrate Joe Licata after she was ticketed for driving without working taillights, a license or valid registration.

he had been through this many times before, she told the judge, and at that very moment she also had a criminal case pending for driving with an invalid license, for which she would stay in jail unless she paid a $3,500 bond. Licata warned her that, if she didn’t pay the fines for these tickets and renew her license after paying surcharges to the Department of Public Safety, “you’re gonna get arrested every time you get pulled over.”

That was nothing to her, Clearey responded — because she had already become trapped in a cycle of arrests.

“It’s nothing to me either,” Licata told her. “It’s job security.”

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: I’ve been trying to explain this concept to Statists for years, but now you can read and hear it for yourselves!

But, Without Government, Who Would Trash Mass Quantities of Food Intended for the Homeless?

The following correspondence originally took place upon my Facebook wall…

State-trashed charity food

State-trashed charity food

Rayn: 3,000 Homeless People Denied Food As City Forces Charity to Bleach the Food and Throw it In Dumpster:
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/3000-homeless-people-denied-food-dumpster/

Sandra C.: That’s a Shame! Is this
What we are teaching our
Children today? To be
Mean to other people?

Rayn: You see, only the government has truly benevolent intentions towards the poor. Everyone else is guilty having malicious motives, until proven innocent, in the form of a government-issued “permit.” Attempts at volunteer-based charity are *especially* suspicious, as there is no legitimate reason to help the needy without being paid to do so!

(I’m being sarcastic, of course, but ridicule works much better when delivered this way)

Ms. Lauryn Hill and Lysander Spooner: A Match Made by the IRS

The following debate originally took place here, upon the Facebook wall of Ms. Lauryn Hill, after I posted a captioned photo being shared by the page, “Strictly Voluntary,” along with a comment of my own…

Rayn: Check it out, Ms. Lauryn Hill! Voluntaryists understand your position, all too well! Taxation is Theft!

Artwork originally located here, upon the Facebook page, "Voluntary"

Ms.Hill in part of her statement to the tax judge: “I had an economic system imposed on me.”

Ms.Hill was caught in the trap that Lysander Spooner wrote of over a century ago:
“And yet we have what purports, or professes, or is claimed, to be a contract—the Constitution—made eighty years ago, by men who are now all dead, and who never had any power to bind us, but which (it is claimed) has nevertheless bound three generations of men, consisting of many millions, and which (it is claimed) will be binding upon all the millions that are to come; but which nobody ever signed, sealed, delivered, witnessed, or acknowledged; and which few persons, compared with the whole number that are claimed to be bound by it, have ever read, or even seen, or ever will read, or see.” ― Lysander Spooner, No Treason: The Constitution Of No Authority

No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority | by Lysander Spooner:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWESql2dXoc

Murray N. Rothbard considered this essay by Lysander Spooner (1867) “The greatest case for anarchist political philosophy ever written.”

Lauryn Hill – War in the Mind (Unplugged): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze8cFpZ0WHg

#LaurynHill #Spooner #NoTreason #WithdrawConsent #EndStatism #StrictlyVoluntary

(Artwork originally located here, upon the Facebook page, “Strictly Voluntary“)

Jahgreen R.: is it like she wants to be free to express her childhood’s homeworks mistakes now that she is an adult??? I today realize what that word means which she spoke in a poem in London way back in 2005: “What an abracaration!!!” -aryist[s], what about -ist[s]!!! I am a voluntarist if I’m not gonna be a volunteer, but not for grammar mistakes, what’s fucked up with you??!!! Who were you sent by? You amp up not being with you!! Now you’re gonna complain why y’all’re not loving me? but, come on, you………………..repulse

Rayn: My apologies, but I’ve read your comment multiple times, and simply I can’t make out what you’re trying to say within it… Can you please clarify?

Jahgreen R.: A flabbiness spray for Lauren to put in a bubble. She needs to understand, anyone who earns more than average must pay taxes, that’s also accepting the luck could have been someone else’s to put in light out of the many poors who have talent in any other field but will never be able to access. Why wouldn’t the poor be able to receive from the wealthiest in partnerships funds, professional welfare like she ain’t ready to do so? Trust it or not, only the wind has got the answer to this question ; she’ll just have to follow the majority.

Rayn: Nope… Individuals cannot simply relegate rights which they don’t have, themselves, to others, no matter how much they imagine that such activity would somehow eliminate the lack of morality inherent to the unjust acts they seek to commit, by proxy – nor will it relinquish them of personal responsibility for the acts now being committed in their name. Since you and I have no right to take money from others without their consent, neither does the State! It wouldn’t matter if we tossed out the claim that it was for the “greater good,” or if we used some of the stolen money to buy our victim a service he also didn’t consent to, as we pocketed some for ourselves as payment for arranging said service. It would be a criminal act, regardless. It’s probably disappointing to hear this, if you’re a member of the Statist cult, but… yeah… true morality is universal, like that.

Taxation is Theft, and Taxation is Extortion. To those who advocate such theft under the guise of “helping the poor” with stolen funds, I say, “Check Your Statist Privilege,” my friend! (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)

Soulless State Creates Poverty and Artificially Inflates Homelessness as a Matter of Policy

I originally posted the following information and commentary upon my Facebook wall…

2016-09-14-soulless-state-creates-poverty-and-artificially-inflates-homelessness-as-a-matter-of-policy

Owners Assisting Homeless Face $1000 Fines – Occupied RV’s Not Allowed on Private Property:
http://www.dontcomply.com/owners-assisting-homeless-face-1000-fines-occupied-rvs-not-allowed-on-private-property/

(Andre’ Gabriel EsparzaProperty owners in rural Oregon who are providing a refuge for families and or friends that were displaced by the region’s housing crisis have been told to stop, cease, and desist.

Renee Glass, a kind woman in the rural area of the county has been voluntarily helping her fellow friends and family in need by opening up her private property to them. They parked their camper along-side her barn and hooked up a temporary water hose, sewer, and an extension cord. Now the tactless county code enforcement division are proving once again that private property is not owned by the individuals. Paying eternal rent on their land is not enough for these controllers, they now say that she is in violation of an unjust county ordinance.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Please read this article, and perhaps you’ll finally understand how the soulless State creates poverty and artificially inflates homelessness, as a matter of policy. And, the more individuals that are forced into State-run services, the more tax dollars can be poured into said services, the more the agents of the State can be hired to “assist,” and finally, the more the State administrators can rob from the allocated funds.