Belief That Police Are “Public Servants,” Keeping “Law and Order” Indicates a Severe, Almost-Completely-Irreversible Case of Stockholm Syndrome

I originally posted the following information and commentary upon my Facebook wall…

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Chief, Kerr Putney

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Chief, Kerr Putney

Charlotte Police Chief Will Not Release Bodycam Video of Keith Scott Shooting Because of State Law (That Doesn’t Even Go Into Effect Until Oct. 1):
http://thegrio.com/2016/09/22/cop-refuses-release-bodycam-video-keith-scott/

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Chief Kerr Putney is refusing to release the bodycam video footage of the death of Keith Scott.

The announcement came just moments after Mayor Jennifer Roberts promised that there would be transparency in the case.

Putney claimed that he could not release the video footage because of a state law that requires a court order for such video to be released.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: If you still believe these are “public servants,” keeping “law and order,” you have a severe, almost-completely-irreversible case of Stockholm Syndrome! Keep licking those boots, and eating that dust, my friend!

For those who still have a moral compass left in all of this madness, please take that final, courageous step towards the peace and justice of true freedom, and Vacate The State! “Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery”! Your soul will thank you, and love you back, when you no longer have to justify the things that offend it, most.

State Enforces Immoral “Laws” to Promote Poverty, Corner Black Market, and Consolidate Power

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Sapona Ridge Country Club home in the small town of Lexington, North Carolina

Sapona Ridge Country Club home in the small town of Lexington, North Carolina

510 Pound Marijuana Bust in North Carolina Mansion:
http://marijuanaworldnews.com/510-pound-marijuana-bust-in-north-carolina-mansion/

Two men have been arrested for turning a North Carolina country club mansion into a massive marijuana farm.

Hong and Haih Nguyen rented a large Sapona Ridge Country Club home in the small town of Lexington where WFMY reported they operated seven grow rooms containing more than 500 pounds of pot when cops stormed in Monday evening.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Thieving pigs enforce immoral “laws” to promote poverty, corner the black market for the State, and consolidate more power into the hands of the government officials at the expense of peaceful individuals.

Discussing Government Efforts to Criminalize Homelessness

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post ,”But, Without Government, Who Would Criminalize Homelessness?“…

Rayn: No victim, no crime, slimeball!

“Concord City Ordinance 50-10: No person may occupy a public bench for more than 20 consecutive minutes; and no more than 30 minutes combined for a 24 hour period. Violation: Class III Misdemeanor”

“Concord City Ordinance 50-10:
No person may occupy a public bench for more than 20 consecutive minutes; and no more than 30 minutes combined for a 24 hour period.
Violation: Class III Misdemeanor”

Adam L.: A clear targeting of homeless folks.

But, Without Government, Who Would Criminalize Homelessness?

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “A Wolf in a Sheeple’s World,” and originally posted it to my own wall…

"Concord City Ordinance 50-10: No person may occupy a public bench for more than 20 consecutive minutes; and no more than 30 minutes combined for a 24 hour period. Violation: Class III Misdemeanor"

“Concord City Ordinance 50-10:
No person may occupy a public bench for more than 20 consecutive minutes; and no more than 30 minutes combined for a 24 hour period.
Violation: Class III Misdemeanor”

My Commentary: No victim, no crime, slimeball!

Discussing North Carolina’s So-Called “Bathroom Bill”

The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of my friend, Stacie T., after she shared artwork from here

Stacie T.:

"Excuse me! Do you MIND!?!" " Just makin' sure you ain't some kind of PERVERT!"

“Excuse me! Do you MIND!?!”
” Just makin’ sure you ain’t some kind of PERVERT!”

Rayn: LOL. This is what happens when facts take a back seat to emotionally-charged conjecture. Why focus solely on restrooms, which constitute only one quarter of the subject matter at hand, when the bill clearly legislates “restroom[s], locker room[s], changing room[s], or shower room[s]”? Have any of those railing so hard against this bill EVEN READ ITS MERE FIVE PAGES, or is that too much to ask a thinking, reasoning human being to do BEFORE formulating strong opinions, anymore? I still haven’t found even ONE who actually has, yet! *sigh*

http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2015E2/Bills/House/PDF/H2v4.pdf

Lest our memories remain selectively short for the sake of politically convenient “outrage” and a completely shallow and shortsighted sense of “fighting against discrimination,” this “bill” was a direct response to a Charlotte, NC ordinance which, among other things, contained language that attempted to FORCE schools and public agencies to provide males and females access to ALL FOUR of these facilities, regardless of gender, in the name of “transgender” rights, and that individuals be granted such access with little more than a verbal declaration of being “transgender.”

With this understanding in mind, enforcement of this “bill” is actually pretty simple in three out of four situations. On average, the easiest way to know if a male is in using a locker room, changing room or shower room is that he’ll HAVE A PENIS dangling between his legs! And, a female using a men’s locker room will have a vulva. In other words, regardless of gender titles, or how an Individual looks, it’s a WHOLE DIFFERENT STORY for one to remove their clothes, and have a sex organ that doesn’t correspond with their appearance, nor with the gender-assignment of the bathroom, itself. This is very likely why the mainstream media monopoly is fixating on the bathroom scenario, instead of discussing the entire issue at hand. Not only is it the least enforceable, making it the biggest gray area in the bill, but any discussion of a man or women entering any of the other three spaces would be met with a knee-jerk “I DON’T FUCKING THINK SO” from even the vast majority of the most left-leaning, progressive liberals! This is especially true when taking note of the fact that the first section of this bill is dedicated to SCHOOLS and STUDENTS, along with public agencies!

Meanwhile, this bill actually protects post-operative transsexuals, granting them full access to all four facilities, since they are, indeed legally able to change their gender on their birth certificate in ALL FIFTY STATES of the Union!

http://www.lambdalegal.org/know-your-rights/transgender/changing-birth-certificate-sex-designations

To be clear, I’m mostly just laying out the facts, without yet providing my own views. Personally, I think that multi-occupancy bathrooms, alone, are highly unsanitary, very anti-privacy, completely anti-responsibility, anti-safety, anti-parent-and-child, and also typically anti-disability (not too mention anti-menstruation, as well), so I avoid them like the plague. Meanwhile, I have NEVER, and would NEVER, use a multi-occupancy showers, nor would I dare get undressed in a multi-occupancy changing room, nor locker room! And, I hope to see all of these sorts of facilities one day replaced with single-occupancy unisex units – and I honestly believe that ALL of these bills and ordinances will make my desire an actual reality, since it is the simplest solution to all of controversy at hand. 🙂 Even at one of my recent Autistic Self-Advocacy meetings, in Greensboro, NC, ALL THREE transgendered individuals agreed with me on my viewpoint, and when I listed my various grievances in detail, they even chimed in with their own examples, too! Peace and privacy are what we’re ALL looking for, while schools and businesses are looking at their bottom line: prices – without much more than a passing regard for the human factor!

Oh, and for the record, the single-occupancy bathrooms I mention would truly work a lot better if they were segregated by “urination” and “defecation,” rather than gender! LOL! 😉 (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)