But, Without Government-Run Socialized Medicine, Who Would Implement the Eugenics?

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Toronto’s Sick Kids Hospital Preparing Policy for Euthanasia for Youth Over 18 That Could One Day Apply to Minors:
https://vancouversun.com/health/sick-kids-preparing-policy-for-euthanasia-for-youth-over-18-that-could-one-day-apply-to-minors/wcm/f3fe9858-3f43-4e70-b34c-71f506e4a0ba

(Sharon Kirkey) A team at Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Children has developed a draft policy on doctor-assisted dying that applies to youth aged 18 and older — the legal age restriction for “medical-aid in dying,” or MAID, in Canada. However, the policy was also developed “with an eye to a future when MAID may well become accessible to capable minors,” the team of bioethicists, palliative care doctors and others report in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

In the introduction to the article, they state, “Thus, this paper is intended as a road map through the still-emerging legal and ethical landscape of paediatric MAID.”

The Sick Kids’ working group says the hospital has willing doctors who could “safely and effectively” perform euthanasia for terminally ill youth 18 and older who meet the criteria as set out in federal law, and that it would be “antithetical” to its philosophy of care to have to transfer these patients to a strange and unfamiliar adult hospital. But it is a suggestion that euthanasia might one day take place without the involvement of parents that has provoked fresh controversy in the assisted-death debate.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: But, without government-run socialized medicine, who would incentivize the euthanization of sick kids to conserve precious resources for the greater good?

But, without government-run socialized medicine, who would implement the eugenics?

Discussing the Complete Abuse of Law in Charging Teen With Sexually Exploiting Himself for Possessing Nude Photos of Self on His Phone

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “In Complete Abuse of Law, North Carolina Teen Charged With Sexually Exploiting Himself for Possessing Nude Photos of Self on His Phone“…

Teen victim of legal injustice, Cormega Copening

Teen victim of legal injustice, Cormega Copening

Rayn: Brilliant… *facepalm*

Teen Boy Will Be Charged As Adult For Having Naked Pics of a Minor: Himself:
http://reason.com/blog/2015/09/02/teen-boy-will-be-charged-as-adult-for-ha

Jonas A.: 😮 😮

In Complete Abuse of Law, North Carolina Teen Charged With Sexually Exploiting Himself for Possessing Nude Photos of Self on His Phone

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Teen victim of legal injustice, Cormega Copening

Teen victim of legal injustice, Cormega Copening

Teen Boy Will Be Charged As Adult For Having Naked Pics of a Minor: Himself:
http://reason.com/blog/2015/09/02/teen-boy-will-be-charged-as-adult-for-ha

() A North Carolina 17-year-old caught in a sexting scandal faces charges of sexually exploiting a minor that could land him in jail for up to 10 years, since the law considers him an adult. But one of the minors he supposedly exploited is himself­—which raises an obvious question: how can a teen be old enough to face adult felony charges, but not old enough to keep a nude picture of himself on his phone?

Unfortunately, that’s the Kafka-esque nightmare in which Fayetteville-area high schooler Cormega Copening finds himself after exchanging private nude photos with his girlfriend—with whom he is legally allowed to have sex, but not to sext.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Brilliant… *facepalm*