Exercising “Freedom of Association” in Response to Open Celebration of Crimes Against Peace

The following debate originally took place upon my Facebook wall, after I shared my artwork, “Spreading Democracy

Rayn: Are you doing your part to help spread democracy, tax-serf?

"I'm doing my part to help spread democracy! ARE YOU?" (by Rayn)

“I’m doing my part to help spread democracy! ARE YOU?”
(Artwork by Rayn)

Morgan S.: HAHAHAHA we did tooo.

Morgan S.: aint nothing better then watcvhing a two thousand pound JDAM take out those donkey fuckers that were just shooting at us from a building. KAA-BOOOOMMMMM. Say hello to Allah you fuckers.

Morgan S.Marine Hornet Drops 2,000 Pound JDAM Missile on Terrorist Target:

Rayn: Perhaps you missed the point, Morgan, but the artwork I shared above is completely ANTI-WAR in nature, and derides the terrorism of spreading “democracy” with bombs. From now on, please use your *own* Facebook wall to eagerly and gleefully celebrate the American government’s Crimes against peace, their imperialist occupation policies, and your hatred towards Muslims, rather than doing so upon mine. I am not even slightly interested in reading such comments, and am annoyed and disappointed to read yours, here. And, now that I have made myself explicitly clear, if you continue to exercise such “freedom of speech” on my wall, I will respond by exercising my “freedom of association.” Consider this your first and final warning. I can only hope that you understand my request, and will show it the full respect it deserves, so that we can continue to be friends on Facebook without issue. And, please try not to take exception, cousin, because many others wouldn’t even receive a warning. I would simply take action, instead, with the “unfriend” button. Thanx for your time.

Is it Sexist to Show Concern About the Possibility of Military Combat Standards Being Lowered for Women?

The following debate originally took place upon the Facebook wall of family…

2015-12-18 - Is it Sexist to Show Concern About the Possibility of Military Combat Standards Being Lowered for Women

GenairePressure Grows on Marines to Consider Lowering Combat Standards for Women:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/19/marine-corps-weighs-lower-standards-for-women-afte/

Anke M.: Such BS! Genaire you need to step away from these right wing nut sites, papers and FOX! Jesus, wTF is wrong with you?

Genaire: ? Just sharing the info.

Anke M.: Honey, that’s not information, that’s nasty lies and propaganda!

Genaire: It really isn’t. I’ve seen this from multiple sources and have witnessed it first hand with the lowering of the requirements it took to become a police officer.

Genaire: Question Anke. The only true media in your mind is liberal media? And the Washington Times becomes a right wing but site to you? Lol (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)

Traitorous Trash-Bags at New York Times Rag Shill for Yet More Failed “Gun Control” Laws

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

"The New York Times: All the Bias That Fits the Left"

“The New York Times: All the Bias That Fits the Left”

End the Gun Epidemic in America:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/opinion/end-the-gun-epidemic-in-america.html?_r=0

(New York Times, All decent people feel sorrow and righteous fury about the latest slaughter of innocents, in California. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies are searching for motivations, including the vital question of how the murderers might have been connected to international terrorism. That is right and proper.

But motives do not matter to the dead in California, nor did they in Colorado, Oregon, South Carolina, Virginia, Connecticut and far too many other places. The attention and anger of Americans should also be directed at the elected leaders whose job is to keep us safe but who place a higher premium on the money and political power of an industry dedicated to profiting from the unfettered spread of ever more powerful firearms.

It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency. These are weapons of war, barely modified and deliberately marketed as tools of macho vigilantism and even insurrection.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: While the traitorous trash-bags at the New York Times* publish a front-page editorial shilling for a partial disarmament of all peaceful, gun-owning Americans in the name of fighting the perpetual, government-controlled “crisis” called the “war on terrorism,” sadly, a number of voting slobs are actually cheering them on!

Interestingly enough, the professional liars who write for this rag have NEVER run a front-page editorial calling for a similar disarmament of America’s OVER-MILITARIZED and MURDEROUS POLICE FORCES. Critical thinking would dictate that such an article is LONG OVERDUE for publishing, but alas, there is none to be found!

But, hey… THIS is what manipulating the masses is all about: narrowly framing the debate of major and complex issues into predetermined, easily-controllable positions, and manufacturing mass consent using the problem-reaction-solution formula of The Hegelian Dialectic.

Well, here’s a NEWS FLASH: it will take GUNS to enforce “gun control” laws!

And, here’s a REALITY CHECK: those who want to disarm their fellow citizens in any way, and yet, don’t desire the exact same thing for police, ARE NOT AT ALL “ANTI-GUN”! Rather, these types represent the WORST kind of PRO-GUN “NUT-JOB”: the DANGEROUSLY DELUSIONAL, PRO-ESTABLISHMENT BOOT-LICKER!

Finally, here’s some REAL TALK: the current “gun control” agenda being continuously shoved down the throat of the American public is not at all “progressive,” not the slightest bit “humanitarian,” nor even remotely “peaceful”! It is the intentional, strategic, preemptive removal of any and all domestic resistance to the eagerly overreaching tentacles of US government kraken!

*Note that the The New York Times is, indeed, the same worthless mainstream media monopoly source that continuously publishes disinformation in order to assist the rogue Federal government of US in the commission of Crime against peace in regards to Iraq, Syria and Ukraine, so it’s really no surprise that they continue to betray the American people in order to help the US government consolidate more power, in the name of whatever straw-boogie-man is created to instill the necessary fear…

New York Times Admits it Pushed Fabricated Evidence About Iraq, Syria and Ukraine:
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/04/u-s-government-new-york-times-admit-lied-ukraine-russia.html

Four Star General Wesley Clark Wants Government to Imprison “Radical” Dissenters in Internment Camps

I originally posted the following video and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Four Star General Wesley Clark MSNBC Interview: Government Should Imprison “Radical” Dissenters in Internment Camps:


My Commentary: Problem. Reaction. “Solution.” 😉

"Repressive governments ALWAYS imprison unpopular groups first. But, don't worry. They'll eventually get around to you! (Artwork by Micah Ian Wright, and located at his website, PropagandaRemix.com)

“Repressive governments ALWAYS imprison unpopular groups first. But, don’t worry. They’ll eventually get around to you!
(Artwork by Micah Ian Wright, and located at his website,
PropagandaRemix.com)

"I'm going to be in a concentration camp with all of my favorite writers" (Artwork by LibertyStickers.com)

“I’m going to be in a concentration camp with all of my favorite writers”
(Artwork by
LibertyStickers.com)