Is War “Inevitable” in America, or Do State Forces Conspire to Keep Peace Out of Reach?

The following debate originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “The Doublethink is Strong Among Neo-Liberals“…

Rayn: The Doublethink is strong with this one!

"Epic FAIL"

“Epic FAIL”

Katherine C.: Ok, you do realize that no matter what president we get, given the history and present state of the US and the world, and everything the US has dipped its hand into, some form of war is pretty much inevitable.

Jordan K.: Cancer pretty much inevitable too, does that mean we accept it or should we keep trying to find a cure?

Adam G.: Regardless of which party is in control, capitalism needs war and imperialism to stay alive.

Rayn: Of course, Katherine, you comment begs the question: “then, why does the Texan above have a bumper sticker containing the name ‘Obama’ with the a peace sign inside of the ‘O’?” An even better question would be, “why did Obama receive a Nobel Peace Prize, then, if he simply continued this ‘inevitable’ war you speak of?”

Either way, I reject your fallacious Appeal to probability as a cause for inaction, Katherine, and replace it with logic. Slavery is at an all-time high right now in the world. Should we apply your faulty reasoning to this issue, as well, so as to wash our hands of the matter, and do nothing about it? I mean, it’s going to happen anyway, so why bother, right? WRONG!

And, while you may claim that no matter which president gets in, there will be more war, this is actually just Circular reasoning. Since 2004, the public has consistently been presented with a False dichotomy wherein BOTH of the major party primary candidates are PRO-WAR! We have NO IDEA what would take place if this “framing” of the issues were not taking place – with the full support of the mainstream media monopoly!

When our government engages in War Crimes and Crimes against peace as a BIPARTISAN matter of policy, it is completely illegitimate, unacceptable and repugnant, deserving neither our respect, our support, nor our tax dollar funding, as Americans! (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post)

The Corporate Whores Debate

The following correspondence originally took place upon my Facebook wall…

Jonas A.: Take that, you little brown eye!!! LOLOL!!!

"The Corporate Whores Debate @BrainwashedSheeple This time things will change! #debates Sponsored By, Paid For, and Predetermined by Corporate Media and Big Banks"

“The Corporate Whores Debate
@BrainwashedSheeple
This time things will change! #debates
Sponsored By, Paid For, and Predetermined by Corporate Media and Big Banks”

Rayn: Ha! Pucker up for the camera!

Jonas A.hahahahaha….niiiicccccceeee!!!!

Discussing the Coprophagy of Modern Serfdom

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “The Coprophagy of Modern Serfdom“…

Rayn: The Coprophagy of Modern Serfdom…

“Corporations. Politicians. Media. Citizens.”

“Corporations. Politicians. Media. Citizens.”

Jonas A.: hahaha…more s—t from this…time to throw that s—t back to the 1st line….lol

Rayn: Interestingly enough, what we are technically seeing in this picture are three forms of soulless corporation and just one actual human being… It’s pretty sad that we have placed ourselves as lesser than non-corporeal entities in the chain of existence… We should know by now that the undead are incapable of protecting life! Personally, I carry no such illusions! I’ve been watching the Zombie Apocalypse unfold for decades!

Rebekah P.: this is disgustingly wonderful

British Propaganda FAIL…

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

"The photograph was actually taken by Marco di Lauro in Iraq in 2003"

“The photograph was actually taken by Marco di Lauro in Iraq in 2003”

BBC News Uses “Iraq Photo to Illustrate Syrian Massacre”:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9293620/BBC-News-uses-Iraq-photo-to-illustrate-Syrian-massacre.html

(The Telegraph, ) Photographer Marco di Lauro said he nearly “fell off his chair” when he saw the image being used, and said he was “astonished” at the failure of the corporation to check their sources.

The picture, which was actually taken on March 27, 2003, shows a young Iraqi child jumping over dozens of white body bags containing skeletons found in a desert south of Baghdad.

It was posted on the BBC news website today under the heading “Syria massacre in Houla condemned as outrage grows”.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: British Propaganda Fail…

This story reminds me of the Kuwaiti Incubator Baby HOAX back in 1991, which was used as the pretext for America’s FIRST Gulf War:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_(testimony)

It also reminds me of the Bush Administration’s more recent WMD HOAX was the pretext for war…

The “Occupy Rectum” movement is definitely a most enduring one! It’s hard to believe that it is STILL going strong, after all these centuries! It’s all good, though. I’ll just continue to maintain my position: standing upright, facing the horizon, secure in the knowledge that the ASS is no place for the HEAD to be!

“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” – Voltaire
“War is a racket. It always has been.” – Smedley Butler
“All warfare is based upon deception.” – Sun Tsu

American Government Attempmting to Re-Legalize Propaganda

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

2012-05-20 - American Government Attempmting to Re-Legalize Propaganda

Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mhastings/congressmen-seek-to-lift-propaganda-ban

An amendment that would legalize the use of propaganda on American audiences is being inserted into the latest defense authorization bill, BuzzFeed has learned.

The amendment would “strike the current ban on domestic dissemination” of propaganda material produced by the State Department and the independent Broadcasting Board of Governors, according to the summary of the law at the House Rules Committee’s official website.

The tweak to the bill would essentially neutralize two previous acts—the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 1987—that had been passed to protect U.S. audiences from our own government’s misinformation campaigns.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: War-criminal traitor scum.