Doublethinking About the American Government’s Bipartisan Efforts to Destroy Liberty

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Liberty Minds,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

“Want to know how this guy was able to authorize the wall with just his signature?
Because these guys voted in favor of building it while in the Senate”

My Commentary: If you think liberty isn’t the enemy of both RepubliConArtists and DemoCrackPots… “you’re gonna have a bad time.”

H.R. 6061 (109th): Secure Fence Act of 2006, passed 80-19 by the Senate, under the Bush administration:

Notable “yea” votes include: Barack Obama (D-IL), Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Chuck Shumer (D-NY), Joe Biden (D-DE), Diane Feinstein (D-CA), Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Christopher Dodd (D-CT), among others…

The Whims of War Pigs

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

George W. Bush, Barack Obama, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton

George W. Bush, Barack Obama, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton

War Whenever They Want It:

(Chris Rossini) For libertarians, the issue of war is of utmost importance. Government causes continuous damage to our lives and liberties as a matter of course, but it creates the most destruction when it wages war.

Lew Rockwell sums it up perfectly:

“war, after all, is the ultimate government program. War has it all: propaganda, censorship, spying, crony contracts, money printing, skyrocketing spending, debt creation, central planning, hubris – everything we associate with the worst interventions into the economy.”

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: War pigs…

Properly Labeling War-Criminals

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following status update here, posted by Voluntaryist, Larken Rose, and originally shared it to my own wall, along with commentary…

George W. Bush, Barack Obama, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton

George W. Bush, Barack Obama, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton

Larken Rose: Suppose it was discovered that a man had raped and murdered the woman living in the apartment next to his. Then a friend of the victim, when he heard what had happened, made a bunch of Molotov cocktails and grabbed an assault rifle, and charged into the apartment building, carelessly firing bullets through walls and throwing firebombs around. The result was that the murderer was killed, but half the building burned down, and between the fire and the bullets, five innocent people died, including two small children.

Would you praise the man, and say he was a brave hero, who “made the tough decisions” and got results? Or would you call him an irresponsible idiot, guilty of at least manslaughter, criminal endangerment and negligent homicide, if not outright murder? What if he did similar things, over and over again, targeting other “bad guys,” while consistently killing multiple innocents in the process? What if sometimes he didn’t even get the “bad guy,” while innocents were dying from his actions? What if sometimes he was targeting people when he didn’t actually have proof that they had done anything wrong? Would you view him as a savior and hero, or as a dangerous psycho? Would you hope that he was stopped before he got any more innocents killed?

What if he was the “President of the United States,” and was knowingly getting innocents killed via drone strikes he personally ordered, on a regular basis, based on unproven claims that “bad guys” were hiding in certain buildings?

If you speak of Obama with reverence and respect, you’re a duped idiot. The man is a mass murderer, just as Bush was, and Clinton, and the other Bush, and so on. If family members of his innocent victims wanted to kill the bastard, I wouldn’t blame them in the slightest. If they succeeded, that would be fine by me (even though he would just be replaced with a new sociopathic megalomaniac). I realize this is blasphemy to devout state-worshipers, who revere and adore the most despicable people on earth, but evil doesn’t become good just because you use different words to describe it. As Confucius said, people should “call things by their rightful names,” and the accurate description of the violent criminal living in the White House is not “leader of the free world.” It is “parasite, thief, murderer, tyrant, monster.”

My Commentary: Keep voting for sociopathic scum to ‘rule’ over humanity! It works so well! 😉

George W. Bush, the Murderous Babylonian

The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of my friend, Jordan K

Murderous Babylonian

Jordan K.: Yeah, really? Hmmmm…..i guess he saw the burning….uhhhhh…you fill in the blanks!

George Bush: ‘God Told Me to End the Tyranny in Iraq’:

Rayn: This murderous Babylonian simply invokes the real name of his father:

The truth of Cause and Effect have little meaning to this FORTUNE-worshiping parasite!

He that has ears to hear, let him hear!

Discussing War Criminals for “Peace”!

The following correspondence originally took place on my Facebook wall, upon my post, “War Criminals for ‘Peace’!“…

Rayn: War Criminals for Peace!

“It’s official, Obama takes a commanding lead in the countries bombed 7-4! [For]ward Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, and soon Syria”

Steve L.: “You can’t say that civilization don’t advance, however, for in every war they kill you in a new way.” ~ Will Rogers, The New York Times (23 December 1929)