Most Laws Represent the Violent Enforcement of Personal Preferences

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

“[IL]LEGAL”

There Ought Not Be a Law:
http://reason.com/archives/2018/03/13/there-ought-not-be-a-law

() Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin wants limits on virtual currencies, like Bitcoin, that help people keep their financial lives private from folks like him. Senator Dianne Feinstein wants government regulation of political speech by foreign agents—or maybe just by people with whom she disagrees. Gun control activists want more restrictions with which to threaten peaceful gun owners so that violent predators who break laws will have more things to ignore.

If ever there was a “there oughta be a law moment,” we’re living in it. At least, we’re living in one of all too many such moments. Because people are forever looking to the law as the solution to the ills they perceive in the world around them—often only to spackle over the failures of the previous round of laws. In the process, they’re forever forgetting that laws are usually nothing more than codified prejudices, imposed against resistant populations, by sometimes incompetent and often corrupt enforcers.

(Read entire article here…)

My CommentaryNo Victim, No Crime, control freaks…

Vote-begging the State to violently enforce your personal preferences upon the peaceful? You might just be a Statist!

“Border Control” and “Gun Control” Crowd Share Same Flawed, Authoritarian Logic

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Two Statist Peas in a Pod:
https://steemit.com/anarchy/@larkenrose/two-statist-peas-in-a-pod

(Larken Rose) It’s amazing how much the “closed border” crowd has in common with the “gun control” crowd, in how they think, in how they feel, and in how they talk.

(Read entire article here)

My Commentary: Peel away the outer layers of the “arguments” being used to promote “closed borders” and “gun control” to discover the same exact violent ideology underlying them both.

Consent Means Very Little to the Average Statist

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

“Gun Free School Zone – violators will face severe federal state and local criminal penalties”

What Percentage Of Mass Shootings Happen In ‘Gun Free Zones’? The Number Is Stunning.:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/27440/what-percentage-mass-shootings-happen-gun-free-amanda-prestigiacomo

(Amanda Prestigiacomo) After dozens of warning signs and alerts from concerned citizens went unnoticed, a shooter walked into a South Florida high school and murdered 17 people. In the wake of the tragic mass shooting, guns and “gun free zones” have become hot-button issues.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Blue: “Force gun control on entire population.”
Red: “Force teachers to arm themselves.”

CONSENT means very little to the average Statist. The lure of coercing innocent, peaceful individuals into arbitrary compliance is just too tempting to pass over. Well, guess what, control-freaks? Legitimate governments only have legal jurisdiction over criminals! And, though the State would have society believe otherwise, if there is No Victim, No Crime has been committed! Here’s an idea: how about you all run your OWN lives into the ground, and leave everyone to theirs!

Coercive, Bully-Based Politics, for Peace and Justice!

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “All Interactions Should Be Voluntary,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

“Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority?” – Ron Paul

My Commentary: Coercive, bully-based politics will surely bring peace and justice to this land! Muh democracy!

Government Enforces Abusive, Violent, Non-Consensual Relationship Upon the Masses

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “The Abolitionist Movement,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"I don't believe in government because I don't believe in non-consensual relationships"

“I don’t believe in government because I don’t believe in non-consensual relationships”

My Commentary: Enforcing relationships with others using intimidation, threats, violence, coercion, and brutality is immoral when done privately… But, through the magic of the ballot box… VIOLA!

“Consent of the governed” “You have no right to complain.” “Leave, if you don’t like it.”

America has a bad case of battered serf syndrome…