Tag Archives: elect

Voting for Lesser Evil is Negotiating With Political Terrorists

By | |
1 Comment

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Vote 4 Nobody, Nobody Tells the Truth,” and posted shared it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"A

“Even though they lie, steal, cheat & murder, we still support government and pay our taxes knowing we support our own slavery… Are we all just fucking nuts?”

My Commentary: If you’re voting just to keep the “other candidate” out of office, you’re not “choosing” anything! YOU’RE A HOSTAGE, NEGOTIATING WITH POLITICAL TERRORISTS! You are a kidnapping victim with a bad case of Stockholm Syndrome!

Please stop denying the truth of our predicament in America. Withdraw consent, and choose peaceful freedom, instead! Otherwise, these sociopaths will continue to call themselves the “elect,” while further running our society into the ground. They have spent centuries, now, incrementally criminalizing our humanity, while legalizing their criminality!

The Faulty Dilemma is an Enemy of Reason:
http://acidrayn.com/2012/05/17/the-faulty-dilemma-is-an-enemy-of-reason/

The Astonishingly Corrupt and Conniving Clinton Campaign for Presidency

By | | ,
Leave a comment

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following graphic here, being shared by the page, “Statists Gonna State,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"When Hillary ran her presidential campaign back in 2008, her campaign co-chair was Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Let's say, hypothetically, that after losing to Obama, Hillary CLinton wanted to be assured of the nomination in 2016. What better way to lock it down than having your campaign co-chair lead the party? For this scenario to be possible, Hillary would have to not only compel the current chair to step down, but also for him to recommend Debbie Wasserman Schultz to lead the Democratic Party as its chair. One would assume that Hillary would need to promise the current chair something in return. The chairman who stepped down in 2011 and recommended Debbie Wasserman Schultz to succeed him was... Tim Kaine, Hillary's VP pick in 2016

“When Hillary ran her presidential campaign back in 2008, her campaign co-chair was Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
Let’s say, hypothetically, that after losing to Obama, Hillary Clinton wanted to be assured of the nomination in 2016. What better way to lock it down than having your campaign co-chair lead the party?
For this scenario to be possible, Hillary would have to not only compel the current chair to step down, but also for him to recommend Debbie Wasserman Schultz to lead the Democratic Party as its chair.
One would assume that Hillary would need to promise the current chair something in return.
The chairman who stepped down in 2011 and recommended Debbie Wasserman Schultz to succeed him was…
Tim Kaine,
Hillary’s VP pick in 2016

My Commentary: Keep voting, sheep! We must continue to expand the domestic police state, while increasing the bombing and military occupation of foreign lands!

“A man is no less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years.” – Lysander Spooner

Media’s Getting Real Desperate to Manufacture America’s Consent for Another Four Years of Governmental High Crimes

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Emperor Palpatine / Darth Sidious, from the “Star Wars” films

Emperor Palpatine / Darth Sidious, from the “Star Wars” films

Yes, You Do Have an Obligation to Vote for the Lesser of Two Evils. Here’s Why.:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/06/01/yes-you-do-have-an-obligation-to-vote-for-the-lesser-of-two-evils-heres-why/

(Julia Maskivker) Do we have a duty to vote for the lesser evil when election choices are equally unappealing? Alternatively, do we act rightly if we vote for a third-party candidate whom we prefer on principled grounds even if he or she stands no chance of winning?

Many people are seriously pondering these questions. Some voters believe that casting a ballot for either Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton — the likely nominees of the major parties — would compromise their moral principles in support of freedom of enterprise and greater tolerance. Many Republican voters are gravitating toward the Libertarian Party candidate, Gary Johnson, who appears to embody their political views more faithfully, yet stands no realistic chance of becoming president. In turn, some progressive Democrats are looking at the Green Party’s presidential candidate, Jill Stein, who similarly has no realistic chance of winning.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Ha! Media’s getting real desperate to manufacture America’s consent for another four years of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and an ever-expanding police state, within a country-sized prison.

Sooo…. I’ll ask again: which professionally-lying, war-hawking scumbag do you think best represents your interests as a completely delusional voting slob?
_____________________________________

Why You Got to Stop Voting:
http://fubarandgrill.org/node/1172

Vacate The Vote, and Vote for Nobody! Far from being “political inaction,” “a dereliction of public duty,” or “failure to politically speak,” it is the opposite of all such claims, and stands out, historically, as one of the most real, effective and non-violent means to place a solid vote of “No Confidence” against all candidates at any given election! Withdraw Consent!

When Working to Expose the Fallacies of Statism, Sharing is Caring!

By | |
Leave a comment

The following correspondence originally took place upon my Facebook wall, after I posted a graphic being shared by the page, “The Abolitionist Movement“…

Rayn: 

"Let me make this very clear. Voting is violence, as it legitimizes a false 'authority' that doesn't exist. Begging for a political master in a popularity contest advocates the willful slavery and oppression over your own self and others. Taxation is theft, after you have been extorted through the use of coercion by threat of violence and being put in a cage. Taxation is murder by proxy as your ruling class uses your stolen money to fund mass murder (WAR)."

“Let me make this very clear. Voting is violence, as it legitimizes a false ‘authority’ that doesn’t exist. Begging for a political master in a popularity contest advocates the willful slavery and oppression over your own self and others. Taxation is theft, after you have been extorted through the use of coercion by threat of violence and being put in a cage. Taxation is murder by proxy as your ruling class uses your stolen money to fund mass murder (WAR).”

Jordan K.: I couldn’t have said it better myself, so I shared.

Rayn: Skillz! “Sharing is caring.” 🙂

Stop Voting for Masters to Rule Over You, or You’ll Always Be a Slave!

By | |
1 Comment

The following debate originally took place upon my Facebook wall, after I posted artwork being shared by the page, “Vacate The Vote”…

Rayn: 

"I will not vote. 1. Voting is immoral; 51% ruling over 49% is oppression. 2. US elections are rigged. Poll fraud, super-delegates & electronic voting machines. 3. The electoral college selects presidents. Only 2 states require electors to abide by the will of the voters. 4. Denotes agreement & permission for the system. 5. The lesser of two evils... is still evil. 6. Pre-selected choices so the establishment always wins (see 2-3). Google: Voluntaryism"

“I will not vote. 1. Voting is immoral; 51% ruling over 49% is oppression. 2. US elections are rigged. Poll fraud, super-delegates & electronic voting machines. 3. The electoral college selects presidents. Only 2 states require electors to abide by the will of the voters. 4. Denotes agreement & permission for the system. 5. The lesser of two evils… is still evil. 6. Pre-selected choices so the establishment always wins (see 2-3). Google: Voluntaryism”

David L.: Glad we agree on the deal with superdelegates. The primaries should be about the popular vote.

Rayn:

"Yo, Dawg! We heard that you don’t like the tyranny of the majority over minority groups… So, we legitimized the authority of an ultra-minority through a voting majority, so they can tyrannically rule over everybody, accordingly, while you formally select the next elect minority of tyranny to fully control your humanity, in perpetuity!" (by Rayn)

“Yo, Dawg! We heard that you don’t like the tyranny of the majority over minority groups…
So, we legitimized the authority of an ultra-minority through a voting majority, so they can tyrannically rule over everybody, accordingly, while you formally select the next elect minority of tyranny to fully control your humanity, in perpetuity!”
(Artwork by Rayn, and originally located here)

Daniel F.: That’s why we have a Constitution which specifies limits on what the government is allowed to do. If democracy is “two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for dinner,” then liberal/constitutional democracy adds the restriction that dinner can’t be the sheep. (Not that the system has ever actually worked very well)

Rayn: As I explained to you previously, Daniel, I wholeheartedly agree with Lysander Spooner, who stated, “But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain – that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case it is unfit to exist.” (Click Here to Continue Reading This Post) →