A Very Short Debate on a Full Gun Ban in America

The following debate took place upon my Facebook wall, after I posted artwork being shared by the page, “AnarchoChristian”…


“Liberals: Cops are shooting black people based on race.
Also Liberals: Only cops should have guns.
Republicans: Don’t question cops when they use force.
Also Republicans: The 2nd Amendment is because we can’t trust the government”

Sam B.You’re right. The cop shouldn’t have a gun either.

Rayn: But… without an army of domestic terrorists, funded by victim extortion, and operating under color of law, how exactly do you expect to disarm an entire population of innocent, peaceful human beings?

Debating the AR-15

The following debate originally took place on the Facebook wall of family…

Zayvier B.: This isn’t meant to spark any sort of mass argument, but only to expand a field of view. You cannot deny the use of the AR-15 as the primary weapon of more than half of our nation’s mass showings. With that being said, I want someone to tell me a use that only can come from an AR-15 that would demand it be kept in the homes of citizenry, and is a use ONLY the AR can fulfill

RaynReturning fire at one of these mass shooters you mention? As you said yourself, “[y]ou cannot deny the use of an AR-15 as the primary weapon in more than half of” these types of attacks.

Zayvier B.: Wrong, an AR isn’t the sole item that could be used to deter or defeat a shooter.

Rayn: I said “returning fire,” not “deter,” nor “defeat,” and I meant it in the most literal sense, imaginable…

Zayvier B.: I understand that, but my point was to state what makes the AR something so important and gives it a quality only it has. Any firearm could be used to return fire at any kind of assailant

RaynThen, my question is this: as an innocent human being (also, never charged with domestic violence, nor any felony) that would be engaging in peaceful activity (meaning that there is no actual victim) if I seek to obtain the firearm of my choice, what gives anyone else, but me, jurisdiction over my actions? Why am I to be restricted, so as not to have the exact weapon to defend myself that the criminal easily has at his disposal? Truly, “what makes the AR something so important” that I can’t use one to defend against one?

The Relationship Between Democide and Gun Control

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Vermont Voluntaryists,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

"I can think of 6 million reasons why ordinary citizens should own assault weapons"

“I can think of 6 million reasons why ordinary citizens should own assault weapons.”

My Commentary: Over 11 million, actually… if you’re including all victims.

Traitorous Trash-Bags at New York Times Rag Shill for Yet More Failed “Gun Control” Laws

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

"The New York Times: All the Bias That Fits the Left"

“The New York Times: All the Bias That Fits the Left”

End the Gun Epidemic in America:

(New York Times, All decent people feel sorrow and righteous fury about the latest slaughter of innocents, in California. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies are searching for motivations, including the vital question of how the murderers might have been connected to international terrorism. That is right and proper.

But motives do not matter to the dead in California, nor did they in Colorado, Oregon, South Carolina, Virginia, Connecticut and far too many other places. The attention and anger of Americans should also be directed at the elected leaders whose job is to keep us safe but who place a higher premium on the money and political power of an industry dedicated to profiting from the unfettered spread of ever more powerful firearms.

It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency. These are weapons of war, barely modified and deliberately marketed as tools of macho vigilantism and even insurrection.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: While the traitorous trash-bags at the New York Times* publish a front-page editorial shilling for a partial disarmament of all peaceful, gun-owning Americans in the name of fighting the perpetual, government-controlled “crisis” called the “war on terrorism,” sadly, a number of voting slobs are actually cheering them on!

Interestingly enough, the professional liars who write for this rag have NEVER run a front-page editorial calling for a similar disarmament of America’s OVER-MILITARIZED and MURDEROUS POLICE FORCES. Critical thinking would dictate that such an article is LONG OVERDUE for publishing, but alas, there is none to be found!

But, hey… THIS is what manipulating the masses is all about: narrowly framing the debate of major and complex issues into predetermined, easily-controllable positions, and manufacturing mass consent using the problem-reaction-solution formula of The Hegelian Dialectic.

Well, here’s a NEWS FLASH: it will take GUNS to enforce “gun control” laws!

And, here’s a REALITY CHECK: those who want to disarm their fellow citizens in any way, and yet, don’t desire the exact same thing for police, ARE NOT AT ALL “ANTI-GUN”! Rather, these types represent the WORST kind of PRO-GUN “NUT-JOB”: the DANGEROUSLY DELUSIONAL, PRO-ESTABLISHMENT BOOT-LICKER!

Finally, here’s some REAL TALK: the current “gun control” agenda being continuously shoved down the throat of the American public is not at all “progressive,” not the slightest bit “humanitarian,” nor even remotely “peaceful”! It is the intentional, strategic, preemptive removal of any and all domestic resistance to the eagerly overreaching tentacles of US government kraken!

*Note that the The New York Times is, indeed, the same worthless mainstream media monopoly source that continuously publishes disinformation in order to assist the rogue Federal government of US in the commission of Crime against peace in regards to Iraq, Syria and Ukraine, so it’s really no surprise that they continue to betray the American people in order to help the US government consolidate more power, in the name of whatever straw-boogie-man is created to instill the necessary fear…

New York Times Admits it Pushed Fabricated Evidence About Iraq, Syria and Ukraine:

Statism: Arming Sociopathic Professional Liars With Military-Grade Weapons, While Simultaneously Calling for Disarmament of Public in Name of “Safety”

The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of family…

Police victim, Robert Jackson

Genaire: Cops Hit My Car, Then Arrested Me: Suit:

Rayn: Here’s an idea: Let’s arm all of these sociopathic, professional liars to the teeth with military-grade gear and weapons, while simultaneously calling for the disarmament of the public in the name of “safety.” Then, we’ll promote this attempted power-grab as “gun control,” while convincing society that it is a necessary tool for keeping law and order!