As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “All Interactions Should Be Voluntary,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…
“Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority?” – Ron Paul
My Commentary: Coercive, bully-based politics will surely bring peace and justice to this land! Muh democracy!
As I scrolled through my Facebook memories, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “The Great Work,” which I originally posted to my own wall in November of 2016, and decidedly re-shared it, while adding a commentary…
“Maybe its time to question a system that allows millions of people to dominate millions of other people with a flick of a pen.” – Carey Wedler
My Commentary: Bullying, coercion, and non-consensual relations are duly considered criminal… UNLESS, of course, these sociopathic behaviors are properly laundered through the machinations of the Great and Almighty State!
As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “Police The Police,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…
Kelly Thomas: No Conviction, Sandra Bland: No Conviction, Eric Garner: No Conviction, Phil Castile: No Conviction, Freddie Gray: No Conviction, James Boyd: No Conviction, Tamir Rice: No Conviction, Alton Sterling: No Conviction
My Commentary: No worries. Just keep voting harder! That’ll show the establishment you really mean business!
Something to think about: without an injured party, no *legitimate* law has actually been broken. This is the foundation of common law (and common sense). Meanwhile, most of the victims pictured here only ended up being murdered by agents of the government *after* first being detained and harassed using the erroneous pretext of some victimless crime, or another… The State is the ultimate centralization of coercion, tyranny and violence, and represents the cult religion of the Accuser.
I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…
Bans on Bondage and Spanking During Sex Could Be OK, Says Federal Court:
http://reason.com/blog/2016/03/07/bdsm-sex-ban-is-constitutional
(Elizabeth Nolan Brown) Uh-oh, kinksters: sex cops could be coming for you next. According to a new federal court decision, Americans have no constitutional right to engage in consensual BDSM because “sexual activity that involves binding and gagging or the use of physical force such as spanking or choking poses certain inherent risks to personal safety.” Thus officials could constitutionally ban or regulate such activity in the interest of “the protection of vulnerable persons,” the court held.
My Commentary: FLASHBACK 2016: Last year, due to a single case of alleged abuse, the creepy control-freaking legislators in State of Virginia handed themselves the right to restrict the private consensual sexual activity of all residents… for their own safety, of course! Ironically, they eagerly exploited an isolated issue of consent in order to enact collective coercion upon the entire community.
According to the ruling, “a legislative restriction on BDSM activity is justifiable by reference to the state’s interest in the protection of vulnerable persons, i.e. sexual partners placed in situations with an elevated risk of physical harm.
[…]
“Sexual activity that involves binding and gagging or the use of physical force such as spanking or choking poses certain inherent risks to personal safety not present in more traditional types of sexual activity. Thus, as inCruzan and Glucksberg, a legislative restriction on BDSM activity is justifiable by reference to the state’s interest in the protection of vulnerable persons, i.e. sexual partners placed in situations with an elevated risk of physical harm.”
As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by anarchist, Adam Kokesh, and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…
“Real anarchists don’t wave flags and don’t wear uniforms” (TheFreedomLine.com)
My Commentary: Legitimate Anarchists Adhere to a Peaceful, Principled, Anti-Political Philosophy of Freedom!
http://acidrayn.com/2016/11/12/legitimate-anarchists-adhere-to-a-peaceful-principled-anti-political-philosophy-of-freedom/
And, we absolutely do not initiate violence upon others, nor destroy property that isn’t ours!
If these sorts of COERCIVE activities are taking place against persons or their property, by definition, anarchy is not occurring!
anarchy: (n): without a ruler
(From Greek anarkhia, from anarkhos, from an- ‘without’ + arkhos ‘chief, ruler’)
The words you’re looking for to describe these sociopathic behaviors are “criminality” and “rulership.”
The only reason to toss the word “anarchy” into the mix is out of ignorance, or to discredit and smear LEGITIMATE anarchists, who adhere to a peaceful, principled, anti-political philosophy of freedom!
