Most Laws Represent the Violent Enforcement of Personal Preferences

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

“[IL]LEGAL”

There Ought Not Be a Law:
http://reason.com/archives/2018/03/13/there-ought-not-be-a-law

() Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin wants limits on virtual currencies, like Bitcoin, that help people keep their financial lives private from folks like him. Senator Dianne Feinstein wants government regulation of political speech by foreign agents—or maybe just by people with whom she disagrees. Gun control activists want more restrictions with which to threaten peaceful gun owners so that violent predators who break laws will have more things to ignore.

If ever there was a “there oughta be a law moment,” we’re living in it. At least, we’re living in one of all too many such moments. Because people are forever looking to the law as the solution to the ills they perceive in the world around them—often only to spackle over the failures of the previous round of laws. In the process, they’re forever forgetting that laws are usually nothing more than codified prejudices, imposed against resistant populations, by sometimes incompetent and often corrupt enforcers.

(Read entire article here…)

My CommentaryNo Victim, No Crime, control freaks…

Vote-begging the State to violently enforce your personal preferences upon the peaceful? You might just be a Statist!

“Border Control” and “Gun Control” Crowd Share Same Flawed, Authoritarian Logic

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Two Statist Peas in a Pod:
https://steemit.com/anarchy/@larkenrose/two-statist-peas-in-a-pod

(Larken Rose) It’s amazing how much the “closed border” crowd has in common with the “gun control” crowd, in how they think, in how they feel, and in how they talk.

(Read entire article here)

My Commentary: Peel away the outer layers of the “arguments” being used to promote “closed borders” and “gun control” to discover the same exact violent ideology underlying them both.

A Vulgar Superstition

As I scrolled through my Facebook memories, I discovered the following artwork, which I originally shared to my wall in February of 2016, in my post, “The Majority Cannot Give Consent for the Minority,” and decidedly re-shared it, along with a new commentary…

My Original Commentary:

“Democracy is based on the idea that the
majority can give consent for the minority.
But consent doesn’t work like that.”

“Yo, Dawg! We heard that you don’t like the tyranny of the majority over minority groups…
So, we legitimized the authority of an ultra-minority through a voting majority, so they can tyrannically rule over everybody, accordingly, while you formally select the next elect minority of tyranny to fully control your humanity, in perpetuity!”
(Artwork by Rayn, and originally located here)

My New Commentary: A vulgar superstition.

(note: though I previously shared a different picture of this quote in February of 2016, within my post, “The Majority Cannot Give Consent for the Minority,” I still felt compelled to offer up an alternative commentary when I saw it again, due to the inspiring nature of these words)

Consent Means Very Little to the Average Statist

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

“Gun Free School Zone – violators will face severe federal state and local criminal penalties”

What Percentage Of Mass Shootings Happen In ‘Gun Free Zones’? The Number Is Stunning.:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/27440/what-percentage-mass-shootings-happen-gun-free-amanda-prestigiacomo

(Amanda Prestigiacomo) After dozens of warning signs and alerts from concerned citizens went unnoticed, a shooter walked into a South Florida high school and murdered 17 people. In the wake of the tragic mass shooting, guns and “gun free zones” have become hot-button issues.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Blue: “Force gun control on entire population.”
Red: “Force teachers to arm themselves.”

CONSENT means very little to the average Statist. The lure of coercing innocent, peaceful individuals into arbitrary compliance is just too tempting to pass over. Well, guess what, control-freaks? Legitimate governments only have legal jurisdiction over criminals! And, though the State would have society believe otherwise, if there is No Victim, No Crime has been committed! Here’s an idea: how about you all run your OWN lives into the ground, and leave everyone to theirs!

Coercive, Bully-Based Politics, for Peace and Justice!

As I scrolled through my Facebook news feed, I discovered the following artwork here, being shared by the page, “All Interactions Should Be Voluntary,” and originally posted it to my own wall, along with commentary…

“Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority?” – Ron Paul

My Commentary: Coercive, bully-based politics will surely bring peace and justice to this land! Muh democracy!