DNC Lawyers Argue that Keeping Neutrality in Choosing a Primary Presidential Candidate is Merely a “Political Promise”

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

DNC Lawyers Argue No Liability: Neutrality Is Merely a “Political Promise”:

(Democratic National Committee (DNC) lawyers responded on October 14 in support of their motion to dismiss the class action lawsuit against the DNC and former chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, maintaining that a fair and balanced Democratic primary is just a “political promise.”

“Courts have uniformly rejected attempts to litigate on the basis of purported political promises, including ‘statements of principle and intent in the political realm’” wrote the DNC lawyers. “These decisions have not always been explicit in their reasoning, but they reflect the long-standing judicial understanding that, because they inherently raise serious questions of justiciability and threaten core First Amendment rights of political speech and association, “[p]olitical squabbles are not as easily resolved in federal courts as are some other disputes.”

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: From the article, “Apparently voters were supposed to assume the DNC was biased in favor of Clinton before the primaries even started.”

Therefore, according to DNC lawyers, the class action lawsuit against the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz should be dropped, and Bernie Sanders wasn’t actually robbed by the DNC…

#FeelTheBern #SelectedNotElected

The American Public is Completely Losing Faith in the Mainstream Media Monopoly Due to Their Biased 2016 Presidential Election Coverage

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Professional spin doctors...

Professional spin doctors…

Mainstream Media Admits It May “Never Recover” from 2016 Election:

(Carey Wedler) In a revealing statement that flew largely under the radar earlier this month, the mainstream media admitted it would never recover from its irresponsible and negligent coverage of the 2016 presidential election. A recent column published in the New York Post referred to the media’s reporting as “the complete collapse of American journalism as we know it.

In his article for the Post, Fox News contributor Michael Goodwin discussed the media’s pro-Clinton bias – one recognized by supporters of virtually every other presidential candidate, from Bernie Sanders to Jill Stein to Gary Johnson and, of course, Donald Trump. Even Americans who don’t necessarily have a horse in the 2016 race notice the slant.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Less and less are believing in the lies of these spin doctors…

Discussion on Medically Tyranny Behind Gender Reassignment of Intersex Infants

The following correspondence originally took place upon onto my Facebook wall…

Female (XX, or XXX), Male (XY), and Intersex (XXY)

Female (XX, or XXX), Male (XY), and Intersex (XXY)

Rayn: Check it out, Karl! Just now, while scrolling my timeline, I noticed a FB friend of mine sharing this article, and Rosalind Franklin is the very first researcher mentioned – just like we were talking about the other day! Synchronicity! 🙂

6 Women Scientists Who Were Snubbed Due to Sexism:

Siobhán L.: Nice article!

Siobhán L.: Also – as you might know – Nettie Stevens has probably played a large role in my own life, in which if they never figured out chromosomal sex – I might be in a very different situation, (I am XXY)

Rayn: Wow! More synchronicity! I was literally JUST talking about the topic of intersex with my husband only a little while after making this post. The reason why is because I had also talked about it with a friend yesterday afternoon, during an interview that she asked to conduct on me regarding the topic of “Diversity and Oppression” for a master’s level course she is currently taking at Rutger’s. At that time, before the interview started, while we we warming up with a discussion on unrealized forms of bias and discrimination, I eventually brought up intersex individuals, and, at one point, even mentioned how this group makes up at least 1% of the population – a figure she found to be surprising. So, right after making the post above, I remembered that portion of my pre-interview discussion, and finally decided to look up the figures again, to know for sure. After I was done, I showed my husband, who was also present during my interview, and then, I once again began railing against the common and accepted practice of surgical intervention shortly after birth for those individuals who express any significant form of having both male and genitalia (just as I had done the first time I looked into intersex about a year ago). I cannot help but see it as nothing more than an arrogant and misguided attempt to “medically” force the false dichotomy of a two-gender society.

Siobhán L.: Agreed – speaking about specifically XXY individuals – about 1/3rd of us are fine with being ID’d as male, about 1/3rd as female (I fall into this group) – but about 1/3rd ID as both, a 3rd gender, or genderqueer. I think this is fairly standard across other types of IS too – but I don’t know as much about them from experience.

Siobhán L.: I also fall into a weird other category of being an XXY individual who’s mother took a synthetic estrogen while pregnant with me – causing more teratogenic effects of having only partially formed male parts, and partially formed female parts (I think it’s probably about 80% male, 20% female – roughly)

Rayn: No doubt, Siobhán. Thank you for your valuable input! I really appreciate it! 🙂

Discussing the Various Problems with “Clinical Drug Trials”

The following correspondence originally took place upon the Facebook wall of my friend, and fellow Autistic self-advocate, Jason Ross…

JasonWhy FDA Drugs Kill People – Mind Control Report:

Rayn: Here’s something else wrong with clinical trials:

Placebo Fraud Rocks Very Foundation of Modern Medical Science; Thousands of Clinical Trials Invalidated: