Tag Archives: 2016 presidential candidate

Hopeful That Wikileaks Will End Hillary’s Presidential Campaign, and More!

By | |
1 Comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

2016 Democratic Presidential Candidate, HIllary Clinton, and Wikileaks Founder, Julian Assange

2016 Democratic Presidential Candidate, HIllary Clinton, and Wikileaks Founder, Julian Assange

Wikileaks Could End Hillary’s Presidential Campaign Tomorrow, Sources Say:
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2016/10/03/will-wikileaks-put-an-end-to-hillarys-campaign-this-week/

As the political campaigns of both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump continue in the United States, the battle for presidency has begun to resemble reality television more than genuine politics.

Statements are made, stances taken, and arguments ignited that all seem far too scripted and controversial to have occurred organically. Whether or not this is the case, we as a collective have fully bought into it, as this first presidential debate broke viewership records, with 84 million tuning in to the “interesting” spar, according to Nielsen.

While both presidential hopefuls have already endured significant scrutiny, it appears as though Hillary Clinton may be in line for the next devastating blow, though she has already been victimized by the stealthy work of Julian Assange on several occasions:

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Sweet!!! Can they end Trump’s, while they’re at it?

“Humans of New York”? Ha! Hillary Clinton Should be Featured on “Lizards of Gov”!

By | |
Leave a comment

The following correspondence originally took place upon my the Facebook wall of my friend, Katherine C, after she posted a captioned photo being shared by the page, “Humans of New York“…

Katherine C.:

"I’m not Barack Obama. I’m not Bill Clinton. Both of them carry themselves with a naturalness that is very appealing to audiences. But I’m married to one and I’ve worked for the other, so I know how hard they work at being natural. It’s not something they just dial in. They work and they practice what they’re going to say. It's not that they're trying to be somebody else. But it's hard work to present yourself in the best possible way. You have to communicate in a way that people say: ‘OK, I get her.’ And that can be more difficult for a woman. Because who are your models? If you want to run for the Senate, or run for the Presidency, most of your role models are going to be men. And what works for them won’t work for you. Women are seen through a different lens. It’s not bad. It’s just a fact. It’s really quite funny. I’ll go to these events and there will be men speaking before me, and they’ll be pounding the message, and screaming about how we need to win the election. And people will love it. And I want to do the same thing. Because I care about this stuff. But I’ve learned that I can’t be quite so passionate in my presentation. I love to wave my arms, but apparently that’s a little bit scary to people. And I can’t yell too much. It comes across as ‘too loud’ or ‘too shrill’ or ‘too this’ or ‘too that.’ Which is funny, because I’m always convinced that the people in the front row are loving it.”

“I’m not Barack Obama. I’m not Bill Clinton. Both of them carry themselves with a naturalness that is very appealing to audiences. But I’m married to one and I’ve worked for the other, so I know how hard they work at being natural. It’s not something they just dial in. They work and they practice what they’re going to say. It’s not that they’re trying to be somebody else. But it’s hard work to present yourself in the best possible way. You have to communicate in a way that people say: ‘OK, I get her.’ And that can be more difficult for a woman. Because who are your models? If you want to run for the Senate, or run for the Presidency, most of your role models are going to be men. And what works for them won’t work for you. Women are seen through a different lens. It’s not bad. It’s just a fact. It’s really quite funny. I’ll go to these events and there will be men speaking before me, and they’ll be pounding the message, and screaming about how we need to win the election. And people will love it. And I want to do the same thing. Because I care about this stuff. But I’ve learned that I can’t be quite so passionate in my presentation. I love to wave my arms, but apparently that’s a little bit scary to people. And I can’t yell too much. It comes across as ‘too loud’ or ‘too shrill’ or ‘too this’ or ‘too that.’ Which is funny, because I’m always convinced that the people in the front row are loving it.”

Rayn: Lizards of Gov…

Green Party Presidential Candidate Criminally-Charged for Spray Painting on Dakota Access Pipeline Equipment, While Police Who Brutalize Protesters Remain Free to Engage in More Abuse

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Green Party Presidential candidate, Jill Stein, prepares to spray paint on blade of bulldozer located on the Dakota Access Pipeline site

Green Party Presidential candidate, Jill Stein, prepares to spray paint on blade of bulldozer located on the Dakota Access Pipeline site

Jill Stein Charged For North Dakota Pipeline Protest:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/jill-stein-north-dakota-protest_us_57d07a55e4b06a74c9f264de

A sheriff’s department in North Dakota filed charges against the U.S. Green Party presidential candidate, Jill Stein, for damaging equipment during protests on Tuesday over construction of an oil pipeline.

Stein was part of a group protesting the Dakota Access pipeline and spray-painted construction equipment, the Morton County Sheriff’s Department said. Stein does not dispute the account. The department said Stein and her running mate Ajamu Baraka was charged with criminal trespass and criminal mischief.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Spray paint on digging equipment? You’ll be charged with “damaging equipment” and “criminal mischief.”

Sic dogs on, and maul, peaceful protesters? No charges.

Imperialism, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity Acceptable, So Long as Team Blue Engages in Them

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

2016 Democratic Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, the war monger

2016 Democratic Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, the war monger

Killary’s Speech on “American Exceptionalism” : A Pledge to Further US Global Domination:
https://www.sott.net/article/327307-Killarys-speech-on-American-Exceptionalism-A-pledge-to-further-US-global-domination

(Patrick Martin) Hillary Clinton’s speech to the American Legion convention Wednesday was a full-throated declaration of the right and responsibility of the United States to control the world by military force. Clinton pledged to keep the US the dominant global military power, to uphold the military alliances through which US imperialism controls Europe and the Far East, and to wage war unilaterally if deemed necessary, regardless of world opinion.

Clinton repeatedly singled out Russia and China as potential targets for US military action, although such a conflict would pose the danger of nuclear war. After listing out the various unsubstantiated allegations of Russian hacking and cyberattacks, including against the Democratic National Committee, Clinton declared, “As president, I will make clear that the United States will treat cyberattacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic and military responses.”

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Imperialism, war crimes and crimes against humanity are okay so long as you’re team blue.

Super PAC Looking for a Few Good Shills to Defend Democratic Presidential Candidate, and Corporate Whore, Hillary Clinton

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Democratic Presidential Candidate, Hillary Clinton

Democratic Presidential Candidate, Hillary Clinton

A Clinton Super PAC Just Admitted That Pro-Hillary Commenters Are Paid Shills:
https://alibertarianfuture.com/2016-election/super-pac-admits-pro-hillary-commenter-are-actually-paid-shill/

() Despite Hillary Clinton’s consultants’ best efforts to make her seem relatable, or even palatable, a plurality of Democrats – and majority of Americans – simply can’t stand her. Look no further than the nearest comment section on news sites covering her campaign. There are always comments about Hillary’s pro-war voting record, her willingness to take big money from Wall Street, and her frequently late-to-the-party stances on social issues. The facts are out in the open for everyone to see and it’s taking quite a toll on the Clinton campaign. As a result, one of Hillary Clinton’s Super-PACs has pledged $1 million to pay for pro-Hillary commenters to respond. That means the next time you see a pro-Hillary commenter there’s a good chance they’re actually a paid shill.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Super PAC looking for a few good shills, willing to help defend their favorite corporate whore…