Obama: Human Sacrifice Brings Light to Horizon

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

‎"The battle is not yet over. There is going to be heartbreak and pain and difficulty ahead. But there is a light on the horizon because of the sacrifices you've made." - Barack Obama (artwork by Liberty Maniacs - check it out on Facebook, here)

‎”The battle is not yet over. There is going to be heartbreak and pain and difficulty ahead. But there is a light on the horizon because of the sacrifices you’ve made.” – Barack Obama
(Artwork originally located here, upon the Facebook page, “Liberty Maniacs“)

Obama: Afghan War Not Over but Light on Horizon:
http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKBRE8401K720120501?irpc=932

My Commentary: No doubt about it… the bipartisan battle to expand the US military into sovereign foreign nations for occupation will rage, unabated. There will CONTINUE to be much heartbreak and pain, indeed! Obama is sure to remind us, though, that human sacrifice is, in fact, REQUIRED in order to bring the light of the Mourning Star to the horizon!

America’s War on Terrorism Ruled by False-Flag FBI Plots

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

2012-04-30 - America's War on Terrorism Ruled by False-Flag FBI Plots

Terrorist Plots Helped Along by the FBI:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-helped-along-by-the-fbi.html?pagewanted=all

(David K. Shipler) The United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years — or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.

But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. Suspects naïvely played their parts until they were arrested.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Finally, the mainstream media monopoly does a little reporting, though they dare not reveal the entire script. I’ll help: these FBI activities classify as False-Flag operations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag

Now, understand the Hegelian Dialectic of PROBLEM-REACTION-SOLUTION:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegelian_dialectic#Hegelian_dialectic

Cause the problem, frame the reaction, and push for your pre-planned solution.

Hiding CIA Torture Evidence in the Name of Fighting “Terrorism”

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Jose Rodriguez defends the government act of hiding torture evidence in his new book, "Hard Measures"

Jose Rodriguez defends the government act of hiding torture evidence in his new book, “Hard Measures”

Ex-CIA Chief Defends Hiding Torture Evidence, But We Need to Know the Truth:
http://blog.amnestyusa.org/us/ex-cia-chief-defends-hiding-torture-evidence-but-we-need-to-know-the-truth/

() It feels like we have been here before. Another testosterone-fueled memoir from a charter member of President Bush’s torture team unapologetically seeks to justify the unjustifiable with inflated claims of attacks thwarted and secret battles won.

Latest to the plate is Jose Rodriguez, former Head of the CIA’s National Clandestine Service, and the man charged with implementing the application of enhanced interrogation techniques (EITs) to detainees that fell into the CIA’s clutches after 9/11.

Rodriguez was not always quite so willing to boast about his handiwork. In 2005 he destroyed 92 videotapes of high value detainees Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri being water-boarded at secret CIA prisons in Thailand.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: “Defends hiding evidence.” Read that a few times in a row. Critical thinking is key here. When, where and why does “evidence” typically require “hiding”? Also, what technically constitutes “criminal conspiracy”? Here’s a helpful clue: http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/conspiracy.html

Cowards-That-Be Addicted to Dark Ecstasy

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

2012-04-30 - Cowards-That-Be Addicted to Dark Ecstasy

Power Really Does Corrupt as Scientists Claim it’s as Addictive as Cocaine:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2136547/Power-really-does-corrupt-scientists-claim-addictive-cocaine.html

More than a hundred years after noted historian Baron John Acton coined the phrase ‘power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’ scientists claim the saying is biologically true.

The feeling of power has been found to have a similar effect on the brain to cocaine by increasing the levels of testosterone and its by-product 3-androstanediol in both men and women.

This in turn leads to raised levels of dopamine, the brain’s reward system called the nucleus accumbens, which can be very addictive.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: DARK ECSTASY: the drug of choice for the Cowards-that-Be.

State of Israel Continues to Engage in Politics of Discrimination

By | |
Leave a comment

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

"Meeting of university heads, 2008: One woman, Prof. Rivka Carmi, third from right, no Arabs."

“Meeting of university heads, 2008: One woman, Prof. Rivka Carmi, third from right, no Arabs.”

Israel’s Politics of Discrimination:
http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/israel-s-politics-of-discrimination-1.426528

(Eva Illouz) Discrimination is the sophisticated, less blunt, distant cousin of racism. It has the same effects as racism − ranking people by birth − without, necessarily, the same intentions, which is why discrimination is mostly and most often an invisible mechanism. This is also the reason why some legal provisions suggest evaluating discrimination on the basis of facts. But facts alone do not scrutinize the mindset of people working in organizations. If, for example, women represent 50 percent of the population, Arabs and Mizrahim constitute 60 percent of the population and if all three groups have almost never been represented among the rectors, presidents and deans, or been recipients of scientific awards of Israeli universities, we need not enter the minds of the people who make these decisions to suspect discrimination. The proof is in the famous pudding.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Discrimination based on gender, ethnicity, religion, etc… IS PURE FALLACY! Why do some countries get a free pass to engage in this disgusting behavior, while others are outright condemned? :sigh: Critical thinking is at an all-time low in this world.