“What About The Hundreds Of Innocent People WE Are Killing With OUR Drone Strikes In Pakistan, and in Yemen, and Somalia!?”

I originally posted the following video and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

“What About The Hundreds Of Innocent People WE Are Killing With OUR Drone Strikes In Pakistan, and in Yemen, and Somolia!?”

My Commentary: Listen to the message shared by this brave woman!

U.S. Military Taught Officers: Use ‘Hiroshima’ Tactics for ‘Total War’ on Islam

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

"Important Perspectives to Consider When Viewing this Model: (1) Some actions offered for consideration here will be seen as not 'politically correct' in the eyes of many, both inside and outside of the United States (i.e. Decision Points considered in PH III where Saudia Arabia threatened with starvation, Mecca and Medina destroyed, Islam reduced to cult status). (2) This model presumes Geneva Convention IV 1949 standards of armed conflict and the pursuant UN endorsement of it are now, due to the current common practices of Islamic terrorists, no longer relevant or respected globally. This would leave open the option once against of taking war to a civilian population whenever necessary (this historical precedents of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki being applicable to the Mecca and Medina destruction DP in Phase III). (3) This model presumes we have already failed at Phase I - 'Deterrence' therefore Phase I is not shown as part of this OP Design framework. (4) This odel restates previous internationally accepted Geneva Conventions for protections afforded to combatants captured in uniform and reiterates removal of protections for those who are caught fighting/operating out of uniform (sovs, terrorists, criminals). (5) Against 'non-state actors' do the Geneva conventions of 1949 now need redefinition / clarification?"

“Important Perspectives to Consider When Viewing this Model: (1) Some actions offered for consideration here will be seen as not ‘politically correct’ in the eyes of many, both inside and outside of the United States (i.e. Decision Points considered in PH III where Saudia Arabia threatened with starvation, Mecca and Medina destroyed, Islam reduced to cult status). (2) This model presumes Geneva Convention IV 1949 standards of armed conflict and the pursuant UN endorsement of it are now, due to the current common practices of Islamic terrorists, no longer relevant or respected globally. This would leave open the option once against of taking war to a civilian population whenever necessary (this historical precedents of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki being applicable to the Mecca and Medina destruction DP in Phase III). (3) This model presumes we have already failed at Phase I – ‘Deterrence’ therefore Phase I is not shown as part of this OP Design framework. (4) This odel restates previous internationally accepted Geneva Conventions for protections afforded to combatants captured in uniform and reiterates removal of protections for those who are caught fighting/operating out of uniform (sovs, terrorists, criminals). (5) Against ‘non-state actors’ do the Geneva conventions of 1949 now need redefinition / clarification?”

U.S. Military Taught Officers: Use ‘Hiroshima’ Tactics for ‘Total War’ on Islam:
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/05/total-war-islam

(Noah Shachtman and Spencer AckermanWired.com) The U.S. military taught its future leaders that a “total war” against the world’s 1.4 billion Muslims would be necessary to protect America from Islamic terrorists, according to documents obtained by Danger Room. Among the options considered for that conflict: using the lessons of “Hiroshima” to wipe out whole cities at once, targeting the “civilian population wherever necessary.”

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: In pure WAR CRIMINAL fashion, the US military taught officers that America’s Nuclear Holocaust against Japan is a worthy example of how best to deal with Islamic nations, because the “current common practices of Islamic terrorists” apparently “leave open the option once again of taking war to civilian population wherever necessary.”

Terroristic British Government Artificially Created Irish Potato Famine

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

The British Government Has Always Been a Terrorist State

The British Government Has Always Been a Terrorist State

The British Empire – A Lesson In State Terrorism:
http://www.sott.net/article/245044-The-British-Empire-A-Lesson-In-State-Terrorism

(Joe Quinn) For most people in Western nations today, terrorism has become synonymous with large scale spectacular acts of violence by small groups against a civilian population and, within the last 15 years, primarily in the name of one religion in particular – Islam. Historically speaking (and I mean up until the present day) there is no justification for this perception, and it can only have come about through a massive and prolonged public propaganda offensive on the part of those with a vested interest in creating and perpetuating it.

The historical record shows quite clearly that states, or those acting on behalf of the state, have been responsible for the vast majority of large-scale terrorist acts against civilians. If we pause to think about it for a moment, it seems natural that this would be the case. The ruling class in any nation, be it a monarchy, democracy or dictatorship, are naturally in opposition to the people over whom they rule because the ruling class enjoy privileges that the people do not. Indeed, the ruling class only enjoy these privileges because of this manufactured divide, that is to say, the ‘haves’ have because the ‘have nots’ ‘have not’.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: Starvation as warfare…

“I have often said, and written, it is Famine which must consume [the Irish]; our swords and other endeavours work not that speedy effect which is expected, for their overthrow.” – Lord Deputy of Ireland Sir Arthur Chichester to Lord Burghley, Queen Elizabeth’s chief adviser, dated 1601

More American War Crimes, Exposed!

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

American Military Torture Victim, Abu Zubaydah

American Military Torture Victim, Abu Zubaydah

Destroyed Videos Showed US Torture Victim ‘Vomiting and Screaming’:
http://news.antiwar.com/2012/05/09/destroyed-videos-showed-us-torture-victim-vomiting-and-screaming/

(Jason Ditz, Antiwar.com) New information on the torture of detainees in custody at CIA “black sites” has come to light, revealing that the videotaped torture of Abu Zubaydah, tapes destroyed in 2005 by the CIA, showed Zubaydah “vomiting and screaming” after being stripped naked and waterboarded.
CIA legal counsel John Rizzo termed the videos “very disturbing” but insisted that all of the torture was “legal” at the time and that the videos were “extraordinarily hard to watch.”

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: As usual, in America, it’s more important to protect war criminals than to protect BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS… And, the torture victim mentioned has never even been formally charged with a crime, either…

Bush-Era Torture Lawyer, John Yoo, Given Legal Immunity by Federal Appeals Court

I originally posted the following information and commentary onto my Facebook wall…

Bush-era torture memo author, John Yoo

Bush-era torture legal memo author, John Yoo

John Yoo, Bush’s Torture Lawyer, Given Immunity:
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2012/05/03/john-yoo-bushs-torture-lawyer-given-immunity

John Yoo, the UC Berkeley law professor who penned legal memos that provided cover for President George W. Bush’s torture program, can’t be sued by one of the victims of that program, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday.

The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said Jose Padilla, an American citizen arrested in 2002 and declared an “enemy combatant,” may not hold professor John Yoo liable for “gross physical and psychological abuse” that Padilla said he suffered during more than three years of military detention, according to the Los Angeles Times.

(Read entire article here…)

My Commentary: American “Justice”…